[VOTE] Apache Geode 1.15.1.RC1

to run geode-examples: ./gradlew -PgeodeReleaseUrl=https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geode/1.15.1.RC1 -PgeodeRepositoryUrl=https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeode-1139 build runAll Regards Mario Kevo

Odg: Release manager permissions

AM, Mario Kevo wrote: > > ⚠ External Email > > Hi devs, > > I need the following permissions for the release manager: > > * bulk modification permission on Apache Geode JIRA > * permission to deploy pipelines to Geode CI > * Docker Hub credentials with

Odg: Release manager permissions

. 20:15 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Re: Release manager permissions Just a reminder to all: we need to find an alternative to the VMware-sponsored CI pipelines currently in use. Any ideas? Should we try to resurrect the old ASF Jenkins jobs? Anthony > On Sep 23, 2022, at 3:26 AM, Ma

Release manager permissions

Hi devs, I need the following permissions for the release manager: * bulk modification permission on Apache Geode JIRA * permission to deploy pipelines to Geode CI * Docker Hub credentials with permission to upload Apache Geode to Docker Hub username: mkevo mail: mk...@apache.org

Apache Geode 1.15.1 patch version

Hi all, I'm going to build a new patch version of the Geode. There is a list of tasks that are declared to be fixed in 1.15.1. As they are already assigned, please can the assignee provide a fix for this so we can move on? https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/GEODE/versions/12351801 Also,

Odg: Release manager for 1.15.1?

Hi Anthony, I want to volunteer as 1.15.1 release manager. Can I get some support on what should be done in this patch release and how to proceed? Thanks and Br, Mario Šalje: Anthony Baker Poslano: 2. rujna 2022. 18:41 Prima: u...@geode.apache.org Kopija:

Odg: Release manager for 1.15.1?

Hi all, I volunteer for 1.15.1 Release manager if it is okay for you. BR, Mario Šalje: rup...@webstersystems.co.uk Poslano: 7. rujna 2022. 11:14 Prima: u...@geode.apache.org ; dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: RE: Release manager for 1.15.1? No, but I think I

Odg: Question about INDEX_THRESHOLD_SIZE

to debugging this a bit when I get the chance – haven’t had a chance to sit down with a debugger just yet. Regards, -Jason From: Mario Kevo Date: Monday, March 14, 2022 at 8:17 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Odg: Question about INDEX_THRESHOLD_SIZE Hi, Regarding Anil's answer:

Waiting review for a few PRs

Hi devs, I have a couple of PR's that are waiting for a review from a few code owners: GEODE-10055: AbstractLauncher print info and debug with stderr instead of stdout (#7368)

Odg: Question about INDEX_THRESHOLD_SIZE

stem property to override >> CompiledValue.RESULT_LIMIT. If so , you need to look at the change and see why its impacting that way. If not, please let me know what change can be made in that test to reproduce the issue you are seeing; that will help to debug/analyze the issue. -Anil. On 3/11/22

Odg: Question about INDEX_THRESHOLD_SIZE

ct the number index look up that needs to be performed; certain latency/throughput sensitive queries that or not expecting exact result may use this (my guess) but by default it should not be resulting in unexpected results. -Anil. On 3/10/22, 6:50 AM, "Mario Kevo" wrote: Hi geode

Question about INDEX_THRESHOLD_SIZE

Hi geode-dev, Some time ago I was working on allowing INDEX_THRESHOLD_SIZE System property to override CompiledValue.RESULT_LIMIT. After this change, adding this attribute will take into a count if you set it. But I need some clarification of this INDEX_THRESHOLD_SIZE attribute. Why is this set

Odg: RFC Introducing VisibleMembers attribute

Hi geode-dev, Just info that the deadline is passed and if you don't have any comments I will start with the implementation. If you have any comments, please add them to the RFC. BR, Mario Šalje: Mario Kevo Poslano: 15. veljače 2022. 9:41 Prima: dev

RFC Introducing VisibleMembers attribute

Hi geode-dev, We published a new RFC: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Introducing+VisibleMembers+attribute If you have any questions and concerns, please add them to the RFC. Thank you. BR, Mario

Re: CWiki permissions

Hi, It is solved. BR, Mario From: Mario Kevo Sent: Friday, February 11, 2022 3:31:59 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: CWiki permissions Hi, I thought that I have permission for writing an RFC, but it seems that I was wrong. Please, can you give me

CWiki permissions

Hi, I thought that I have permission for writing an RFC, but it seems that I was wrong. Please, can you give me permission? My username: mkevo BR, Mario

Odg: Creating index failed

through local or remote the exception can be ignored. As there is only one index creation will be in progress for the same request. -Anil. On 2/3/22, 4:41 AM, "Mario Kevo" wrote: Hi devs, After implementing ignoring exception some tests failed as we allowed now to pass com

Odg: Creating index failed

, Mario Šalje: Mario Kevo Poslano: 14. prosinca 2021. 14:06 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Odg: Creating index failed Hi Alexandar, The cluster config is updated at the end of the command execution, and only in case, the command is successful. I created PR

Odg: Creating index failed

you correctly, the initial request to each server succeeds, but later ones will fail because the index is already there. However, the first, successful request should also have updated the cluster config, right?. Am I misunderstanding something? From: Mario Kevo

Odg: Creating index failed

Poslano: 7. prosinca 2021. 16:41 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Re: Creating index failed In case if you are planning to fix; the probable fix is not to send gfsh create command to all the nodes when its partitioned region.. On 12/7/21, 6:37 AM, "Mario Kevo" wrote: Hi Jason,

Odg: Creating index failed

created or already there. -Jason On 12/6/21, 6:37 AM, "Mario Kevo" wrote: Hi devs, While doing some testing, I found the issue which is already reported there. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-7875 If we run the create index command it will create an ind

Creating index failed

Hi devs, While doing some testing, I found the issue which is already reported there. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-7875 If we run the create index command it will create an index locally and send a request to create an index on other members of that region. The problem happened

Odg: Region is not created on one of the servers

it. Can you please raise a ticket on this issue. --Udo From: Mario Kevo Date: Monday, October 11, 2021 at 11:27 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Odg: Region is not created on one of the servers I think that there can be a problem if we change to first add it to cluster config and then do

Odg: Region is not created on one of the servers

ter config, to make sure that all servers get the region. -Dan ____ From: Mario Kevo Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 5:31 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Region is not created on one of the servers Hi geode-dev, We are using a system with a large number of servers. Whil

Region is not created on one of the servers

Hi geode-dev, We are using a system with a large number of servers. While starting all servers, in parallel, we create a region through gfsh. The problem is that on one of the servers region is not created. There is an example of the problem: We started the locator, and then go with starting

Odg: [DISCUSS] Upgrading to Lucene 7.1.0

VersionMismatch(host) to false in the test so that it does the query. Regards Naba ________ From: Mario Kevo Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 4:49 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Odg: [DISCUSS] Upgrading to Lucene 7.1.0 Hi all, Just a small clarification of the reve

Odg: [DISCUSS] Upgrading to Lucene 7.1.0

Hi all, Just a small clarification of the reverted PR. There were a lot of changes between Lucene versions 6.x and 7.x. There is an article for that Upgrading+to+Lucene+7.1.0. The first larger change was in the

Odg: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.14.0.RC2

+1 * build from the source * run gfsh * run geode-examples Šalje: Donal Evans Poslano: 1. rujna 2021. 2:49 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.14.0.RC2 +1 Validated that performance across a range of workloads is

Odg: Add new attribute to count members visible to member

Hi, Just a reminder of this question. BR, Mario Šalje: Mario Kevo Poslano: 23. lipnja 2021. 13:15 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Add new attribute to count members visible to member Hi, devs, I'm trying to fix attribute visibleNodes in MemberMXBean

Odg: NullPointerException while create region during server restart

n Jul 6, 2021, at 12:06 AM, Mario Kevo wrote: > > Hi Geode devs, > > I opened a new ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-9409 > regarding NullPointerException on creating region while one of the servers is > restarting. > If we run the "create region

NullPointerException while create region during server restart

Hi Geode devs, I opened a new ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-9409 regarding NullPointerException on creating region while one of the servers is restarting. If we run the "create region" command through gfsh while the server is starting it passed, but if the server is

Add new attribute to count members visible to member

Hi, devs, I'm trying to fix attribute visibleNodes in MemberMXBean as for me it seems that we don't have a correct value for it. (More description in the ticket GEODE-9101) The ticket is opened and

Odg: Concourse access

Hi Jacob, I'm also getting error while trying to access pipline: Please, can you give me permissions? My username: mkevo BR, Mario Šalje: Mario Salazar de Torres Poslano: 25. veljače 2021. 22:29 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Re: Concourse access Hi

Odg: Colocated regions missing some buckets after restart

y what's going wrong. - Donal ________ From: Mario Kevo Sent: Monday, September 28, 2020 6:23 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Odg: Colocated regions missing some buckets after restart Hi all, After more investigation I found that for some buckets is problem to

Re: [DISCUSS] One more 1.13 change

+1 Šalje: Patrick Johnson Poslano: 28. rujna 2020. 21:27 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Re: [DISCUSS] One more 1.13 change +1 > On Sep 28, 2020, at 12:21 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like to backport this change to support/1.13 as well > >

Odg: Colocated regions missing some buckets after restart

and for the latest region bucketCount will be zero on one member If someone with more experience with bucket initialization have a time to help me with this I will appriciate it. For any more info, please contact me. BR, Mario ____ Šalje: Mario Kevo Poslano: 17

Odg: Colocated regions missing some buckets after restart

the stats too...Can you try executing a test/validation code on server side to dump/list primary and secondary buckets. You can do that using helper methods: pr.getDataStore().getAllLocalPrimaryBucketIds(); -Anil On 9/14/20, 12:25 AM, "Mario Kevo" wrote: Hi, This problem is usu

Odg: Colocated regions missing some buckets after restart

as the data is not there, the bucket region may not have been created (my suspicion). Can you try adding data and see if the co-located bucket region gets created in respective nodes/server. -Anil. On 9/11/20, 9:46 AM, "Mario Kevo" wrote: Hi geode-dev, We have a syste

Colocated regions missing some buckets after restart

Hi geode-dev, We have a system with two servers and a few regions. One region is persistent and other are not but they are colocated with this persistent region. After servers restart on some region we can see that they don't have any bucket. gfsh>show metrics --member=server-1 --region=/region1

Odg: [PROPOSAL] Remove "Fix Version/s" and "Sprint" from Jira "Create Issue" dialogue and include "Affects Version/s"

+1 Šalje: Dave Barnes Poslano: 18. kolovoza 2020. 7:23 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove "Fix Version/s" and "Sprint" from Jira "Create Issue" dialogue and include "Affects Version/s" +1 esp addition of "Affects Version/s". On Mon, Aug

Odg: Proposal to backport GEODE-8395 (gfsh help banner) to support branches

+1 Šalje: Dave Barnes Poslano: 3. kolovoza 2020. 16:56 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Re: Proposal to backport GEODE-8395 (gfsh help banner) to support branches +1 On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 7:07 AM Donal Evans wrote: > +1 > > Nice catch! > > Get Outlook

Odg: negative ActiveCQCount

the nodes are cache servers. -Anil. On 7/17/20, 12:47 AM, "Mario Kevo" wrote: Hi devs, Just reminder if someone is familiar with this, or someone has some idea how to resolve this issue. Thanks and BR, Mario Šalje: Mario Kevo

Odg: Odg: negative ActiveCQCount

Hi devs, Just reminder if someone is familiar with this, or someone has some idea how to resolve this issue. Thanks and BR, Mario Šalje: Mario Kevo Poslano: 7. srpnja 2020. 15:24 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Odg: Odg: negative ActiveCQCount Hi, Thank

Odg: Odg: negative ActiveCQCount

many times. You could find the statistics class containing activeCqCount and try adding some debugging log statements or even add some breakpoints for debugger if it's easily reproduced. On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 5:52 AM Mario Kevo wrote: > Hi Kirk, thanks for the response! > > I just realiz

Odg: Back-Port GEODE-8240 to 1.12, 1.13

+1 Šalje: Kirk Lund Poslano: 1. srpnja 2020. 19:54 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Re: Back-Port GEODE-8240 to 1.12, 1.13 +1 On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 9:59 AM Dick Cavender wrote: > +1 > > -Original Message- > From: Bruce Schuchardt > Sent:

Odg: negative ActiveCQCount

e of 2. Does anyone else have different info about this? On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 5:31 AM Mario Kevo wrote: > Hi geode-dev, > > I have a question about CQ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-8293). > If we run CQ it register cq on one of the > servers(setPoolSub

negative ActiveCQCount

Hi geode-dev, I have a question about CQ(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-8293). If we run CQ it register cq on one of the servers(setPoolSubscriptionRedundancy is 1) and increment activeCQCount. As I understand then it processInputBuffer to another server and there is

LGTM check failed

Hi all, LGTM analysis: Java check failed for last six opened PRs. https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/5182 https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/5181 https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/5180 https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/5179 https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/5176

Odg: Certificate based authorization - CN authorization in jmx

Hi all, Kindly reminder on this question. Thanks in an advance! BR, Mario Šalje: Mario Kevo Poslano: 22. svibnja 2020. 13:56 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Certificate based authorization - CN authorization in jmx Hi geode-dev, We are working

Certificate based authorization - CN authorization in jmx

Hi geode-dev, We are working on implementing a new feature regarding to this RFC. The main idea is to combine the TLS and access control features, but to use the certificate subject common name for access

Handling packet drop between sites

Hi geode-dev, I have a question about how Geode handle when some packets from batch is dropped. I create Geode WAN with two sites and established replication between them. Also modified iptables to drop all packets that comes to receiver port. In that case I have that some threads are stucked.

Re: Reconfiguring our notifications and more

+1 Šalje: Dan Smith Poslano: 21. travnja 2020. 18:01 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Re: Reconfiguring our notifications and more +1 -Dan On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 9:00 AM Owen Nichols wrote: > +1 > > > On Apr 21, 2020, at 8:54 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: >

Review for PR #4815

Hi all, please could someone review PR #4815. Jira ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-7838 Thanks and BR, Mario

JGroups vulnerabilty

Hi, I was trying to understand whether Geode is impacted by a security vulnerability reported on JGroups (CVE-2016-2141). The vulnerability is related to member authentication and communication encryption. What I could learn from this

Odg: Odg: Certificate Based Authorization

nents=all*. This would not allow a mix of different forms of authentication for different endpoints. Perhaps this might simplify the implementation but would not preclude us from adding that capability in the future. --Jens On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 1:13 AM Mario Kevo wrote: > Hi all, > > I w

Odg: Next release

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 2:03 AM Mario Kevo wrote: > Hi geode-dev, > > When we will have Apache Geode 1.12.0 release? > I saw that all test passed and the last commit was before 4 days(typos > correct). > Are we waiting fix for some critical issue or something else? > > Thanks and BR, > Mario >

Next release

Hi geode-dev, When we will have Apache Geode 1.12.0 release? I saw that all test passed and the last commit was before 4 days(typos correct). Are we waiting fix for some critical issue or something else? Thanks and BR, Mario

Odg: StressNewTest timeout exceeded

> Hi Mario, I’ve re-triggered your PR check with a longer timeout, since I > think you are only about an hour over the current timeout of 6 hours for > StressNewTest. > > > On Feb 5, 2020, at 5:10 AM, Mario Kevo wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I'm workin

StressNewTest timeout exceeded

Hi all, I'm working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-7309 PR: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/4395 All tests passed except stressNewTest which failed with timeout exceeded. Can we somehow override it to pass this tests? BR, Mario

Odg: Odg: disable statistic archival

p review it. On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 11:36 PM Mario Kevo wrote: > @Kirk<mailto:kl...@apache.org>, in case we change --enable-statistic(this > flag refer to STATISTIC_SAMPLING_ENABLED ) to false we lose some metrics in > gfsh and pulse. > What if we want to keep statistic on, bu

Odg: Odg: disable statistic archival

: Odg: disable statistic archival Would it work to archive them to file /dev/null On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 11:36 PM Mario Kevo wrote: > @Kirk<mailto:kl...@apache.org>, in case we change --enable-statistic(this > flag refer to STATISTIC_SAMPLING_ENABLED ) to false we lose some metri

Odg: disable statistic archival

g is disabled. Starting > in > > 7.0 the default value > >* has been changed to true. If statistic sampling is disabled it will > > also cause various metrics > >* seen in gfsh and pulse to always be zero. > >* > >* Default: "true" > >*

Odg: privacy protection

Hi, Just kindly reminder on this. BR, Mario Šalje: Mario Kevo Poslano: 14. siječnja 2020. 16:20 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: privacy protection Hi geode-dev, Is it possible somehow to protect all files that containing user data(or user data itself

disable statistic archival

Hi, We are trying to disable archiving statistic in the file by providing empty string to --statistic-archive-file. This option doesn't work. >From the documentation it should work: The file to which the running system member writes statistic samples. For example: “StatisticsArchiveFile.gfs”.

Odg: [DISCUSS] stop releasing both .tar.gz AND .zip for geode-examples

+1 to remove geode-examples.zip BR, Mario Šalje: Dan Smith Poslano: 17. siječnja 2020. 22:30 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Re: [DISCUSS] stop releasing both .tar.gz AND .zip for geode-examples +1 to removing the .zip for geode-examples. -Dan On Fri,

Odg: GW sender dispatcher threads & order policy

Bustamante Reyes Poslano: 15. siječnja 2020. 18:52 Prima: Mario Kevo ; dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: RE: GW sender dispatcher threads & order policy Hi Mario, My code contains that fix, its not the same issue. GEODE-7561 solves the issue with the value "1" for dispatcher threads, but an

Odg: GW sender dispatcher threads & order policy

Hi Alberto, This is already solved in Geode 1.12.0. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-7561 BR, Mario Šalje: Alberto Bustamante Reyes Poslano: 15. siječnja 2020. 18:14 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: GW sender dispatcher threads & order policy

privacy protection

Hi geode-dev, Is it possible somehow to protect all files that containing user data(or user data itself) being stored in disk for Geode. This includes all persistence data(OpLogs), backups and possible other files containing user data. Also protection is needed for all of the files potentailly

Odg: enable-time-statistics

I'm not sure the nanoTime calls really have > > that > > > much of an impact compared to the rest of the processing time. > > > > > > -Dan > > > > > > > > >> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 11:25 AM Mario Kevo > > wrote: > > &

enable-time-statistics

Hi geode-dev, We have executed some traffic against Geode servers with time-based statistics enabled and disabled and we didn't see any performance difference. The documentation says: If you need time-based statistics, enable that. Time-based statistics require statistics sampling and

Odg: RFC - Logging to Standard Out

+1 BR, Mario Šalje: Jacob Barrett Poslano: 8. siječnja 2020. 21:39 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: RFC - Logging to Standard Out Please see RFC for Logging to Standard Out. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Logging+to+Standard+Out

Odg: Odg: Odg: Odg: Odg: Lucene upgrade

Hi all, Please could someone review #4395<https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/4395>. BR, Mario Šalje: Mario Kevo Poslano: 17. prosinca 2019. 14:30 Prima: Jason Huynh Kopija: geode Predmet: Odg: Odg: Odg: Odg: Odg: Lucene upgrade Hi Jason, Nice ca

Odg: Odg: Odg: Odg: Odg: Lucene upgrade

Hi Jason, Nice catch! I tried with larger number of retries(with your changes) and it passed. I will try to make it time based. Thanks for a help! BR, Mario Šalje: Jason Huynh Poslano: 13. prosinca 2019. 23:10 Prima: Mario Kevo Kopija: geode Predmet: Re: Odg

Odg: Odg: Odg: Odg: Lucene upgrade

a query after all members are rolled. BR, Mario Šalje: Jason Huynh Poslano: 11. prosinca 2019. 23:08 Prima: Mario Kevo Kopija: geode Predmet: Re: Odg: Odg: Odg: Lucene upgrade Hi Mario, Is the same test failing? If it's a different test, could you tell us which

Odg: Odg: Odg: Lucene upgrade

number of entries in tests? BR, Mario Šalje: Jason Huynh Poslano: 6. prosinca 2019. 20:53 Prima: Mario Kevo Kopija: geode Predmet: Re: Odg: Odg: Lucene upgrade Hi Mario, I made a PR against your branch for some of the changes I had to do to get past

Odg: PRs review

Thank you @Bruce Schuchardt<mailto:bschucha...@pivotal.io>!  Šalje: Bruce Schuchardt Poslano: 10. prosinca 2019. 23:53 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Re: PRs review Mario, I've merged GEODE-6927. You can close the JIRA ticket. On 12/10/19 4:20 AM,

PRs review

Hi Geode dev, Need some PR reviewers on the following PRs. JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-6927 PR: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/4085 JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-7561 PR: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/4441 BR, Mario

Odg: Certificate Based Authorization

Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Re: Certificate Based Authorization +1 On 12/2/19 1:29 AM, Mario Kevo wrote: > Hi, > > > > There is another potential functionality we would like to discuss and get > some comments for. The idea is TLS certificate based authorization. >

Odg: Odg: Lucene upgrade

, so I am not sure if the message is incorrect (stating needs to be release 6.0 and later) or if it requires an intermediate upgrade between 6.6.2 -> 7.x -> 8. On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 2:00 AM Mario Kevo wrote: > > I started with implementation of Option-1. > As I understood the

Wiki access

Hi All, Can I have access to edit the Geode Wiki? My username is "mario.kevo". Thanks, Mario

Odg: Lucene upgrade

I started with implementation of Option-1. As I understood the idea is to block all puts(put them in the queue) until all members are upgraded. After that it will process all queued events. I tried with Dan's proposal to check on start of LuceneEventListener.process() if all members are

Certificate Based Authorization

Hi, There is another potential functionality we would like to discuss and get some comments for. The idea is TLS certificate based authorization. Currently, if a user wants secure communication (TLS) + authorization, he needs to enable TLS and access control. The user also needs to handle

Odg: Odg: Restart gateway-receiver

Thanks a lot @Barry Oglesby<mailto:bogle...@pivotal.io>! It seems that this closing inactive connection is done by Kubernetes as we run Geode on it. BR, Mario Šalje: Barry Oglesby Poslano: 22. studenog 2019. 22:35 Prima: Mario Kevo Kopij

Odg: Restart gateway-receiver

ializeConnection to see the behavior. It could be changed to have a task to retry lost connections, but generally there are events in the queue, so the connection is re-established pretty quickly by the event processor thread. Thanks, Barry Oglesby On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 4:55 AM Mario Kevo wrote:

Restart gateway-receiver

Hi geode dev, After creating gateways senders and receivers between two geode clusters replications is established. After restart gateway receiver, sender will not connect to it until we send some entry from sender to receiver. Is this a normal behavior or a bug? Should geode have some

Re: Lucene upgrade

rites to the lucene index during the rolling upgrade process. > Lucene indexes are asynchronous, so this wouldn't necessarily require > blocking all puts. But it would require queueing up a lot of updates. > > -Dan > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 12:05 AM Mario Kevo >

Lucene upgrade

Hi geode dev, I'm working on upgrade lucene to a newer version. ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-7309) I followed instruction from https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Upgrading+to+Lucene+7.1.0 Also add some other changes that is needed for lucene 8.2.0. I found some

Re: ssl configuration parameters

? On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 19:21 +, Mario Kevo wrote: > Hi geode dev, > > We would need to clarify the meaning of some ssl configuration > parameters. When the flag “ssl-enabled-components” is set to > “cluster”, > our understanding is that this means geode would enforce SSL only

ssl configuration parameters

Hi geode dev, We would need to clarify the meaning of some ssl configuration parameters. When the flag “ssl-enabled-components” is set to “cluster”, our understanding is that this means geode would enforce SSL only between members of the same distributedSystem (same site). This would imply that

Not mixing cache.xml and cluster configuration

Hi Geode dev, I've opened ticket about mixing cache.xml and cluster configuration https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-7025 According to some comments on tickets(

PR reviews

Hi Geode dev, We need some PR reviewers on the following PRs. Some of these just need to be *re*-reviewed. GEODE-6998 NPE during update of index due to GII https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/3834 GEODE-6954 GatewaySenderMXBean wrongly reports state https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/3826

Hostname validation

Hi, When SSL is enabled and ssl-endpoint-identification-enabled flag is set to true, hostname validation is performed while establishing a connection. This includes checking the hostname and IP address in the certificate. In past releases, if hostname validation was disabled, a warning log

Apache Geode 1.10 release

Hi all, I saw that on Wiki pages is not updated when should be next Geode release? Does anyone know when it is planned? Thanks in advance, Mario

Request access to Jira

Hi all, Can you give me access to Jira so I can assigne on tickets? My Jira Username is 'mkevo'. Thanks and BR, Mario