Re: Question about INDEX_THRESHOLD_SIZE

the additional purpose of INDEX_THRESHOLD_SIZE in the Apache Geode docs. Please do reach us if you have any questions. Regards Nabarun Nag From: Mario Kevo Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2022 2:55 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Odg: Question about

Re: [PROPOSAL] annul support/1.15

+1 From: Owen Nichols Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2022 2:12 PM To: geode Subject: [PROPOSAL] annul support/1.15 Seven weeks after cutting support/1.15, Jira now shows 11 blockers, up from 5 a few weeks ago. I wonder if perhaps we cut the release branch

Re: [Suspected Spam] [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.8.RC1

+1 based on pipeline status of the artifacts Regards Naba From: Dick Cavender Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 3:47 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: [Suspected Spam] [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.8.RC1 Hello Geode Dev Community, This is a release candidate for

Re: [Suspected Spam] [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.12.9.RC1

+1 based on the test results of artifacts on the pipeline Regards Naba Get Outlook for iOS From: Dick Cavender Sent: Friday, March 4, 2022 2:05:36 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: [Suspected Spam] [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.12.9.RC1

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Geode Board report due by Wed Feb 9th

As, there are no more feedback on this report I am submitting this report to the board. Thank you all. Regards Nabarun From: Nabarun Nag Sent: Friday, February 4, 2022 3:52 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: [DRAFT] Apache Geode Board report due by Wed

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Geode Board report due by Wed Feb 9th

for mitigation might be a better approach. My $.02 --Mark On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 11:34 AM Dan Smith wrote: > Counting the kafka connector I'm not sure bragging about CVE patching > speed is justified, but otherwise looks good to me! > > -Dan > _

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Geode Board report due by Wed Feb 9th

wrote: LGTM +1 On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 12:50 PM Nabarun Nag wrote: > This is a draft of our report to the board. Please let me know if there > are details you'd like me to add! > > --Naba > > ## Description: > The mission of Apache Geode is the creation and maintena

[DRAFT] Apache Geode Board report due by Wed Feb 9th

This is a draft of our report to the board. Please let me know if there are details you'd like me to add! --Naba ## Description: The mission of Apache Geode is the creation and maintenance of software related to a data management platform that provides real-time, consistent access to

Re: [Suspected Spam] [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.7.RC1

+1 based on the results of the pipeline tests. Regards Nabarun Nag From: Dick Cavender Sent: Monday, January 17, 2022 11:20 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: [Suspected Spam] [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.7.RC1 Hello Geode Dev Community, This is a release

Re: [VOTE] - Apache Geode Kafka Connector 1.1.0 - Take 2

as is and create a follow up release that updates log4j and the LICENSE, NOTICE files, so I'm leaving this VOTE open in hopes of getting some more votes. -Dan ________ From: Nabarun Nag Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 5:13 PM To: dev@geode.apac

Re: [VOTE] - Apache Geode Kafka Connector 1.1.0 - Take 2

As it is primarily created for Confluent Marketplace we need to follow the steps required for hosting in the marketplace, which included how things are to be named, folder structure etc. Looking at the list of things to do and conflicts with Geode / Confluent requirements. We can remove it

Re: [VOTE] - Apache Geode Kafka Connector 1.1.0 - Take 2

+1 Checked with building source and running tests. Regards Naba From: Dan Smith Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 2:37 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] - Apache Geode Kafka Connector 1.1.0 - Take 2 This is the same release I started a VOTE on in

Re: ANNOUNCE : Apache Geode Kafka Connector v1.1.0

%7C6d18c25c3e964c840cdd08d9c0295a1d%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637752106109940344%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000sdata=fkplwVHE%2FrHxNzLeJ1%2Bw%2FgxOzN0Fhz7Tuxs8UiPU%2B68%3Dreserved=0 Regards Nabarun Nag [https://nam04

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.14.2.RC1

+1 to 1.14.2.RC1 * Build from source * WAN clusters with SSL * puts/gets * validate data integrity after rolling restart. Regards Nabarun Nag From: Owen Nichols Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 6:19 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject

Re: [Suspected Spam] [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.6.RC1

+1 to 1.13.6.RC1 * Build from source * WAN clusters with SSL * puts/gets * validate data integrity after rolling restart. Regards Nabarun Nag From: Owen Nichols Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 6:19 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject

Re: [Suspected Spam] [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.12.7.RC1

+1 to 1.12.7.RC1 * Build from source * WAN clusters with SSL * puts/gets * validate data integrity after rolling restart. Regards Nabarun Nag From: Owen Nichols Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 6:19 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject

ANNOUNCE : Apache Geode Kafka Connector v1.1.0

/apache/geode-kafka-connector/releases/tag/rel%2Fv1.1.0 Regards Nabarun Nag [https://opengraph.githubassets.com/c2a01e14394ffb0f85e3ec2470786eb2d8c1ab16f34bbcddea1ccdbf7549a9ef/apache/geode-kafka-connector/releases/tag/rel/v1.1.0]<https://github.com/apache/geode-kafka-connector/releases/tag/

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.14.1.RC2

+1 to 1.14.1.RC2 * Build from source * WAN clusters with SSL * puts/gets * validate data integrity after rolling restart. Regards Nabarun Nag From: Owen Nichols Sent: Friday, December 10, 2021 2:09 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.5.RC2

+1 to 1.13.5.RC2 * Build from source * WAN clusters with SSL * puts/gets * validate data integrity after rolling restart. Regards Nabarun Nag From: Owen Nichols Sent: Friday, December 10, 2021 2:09 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject

Re: [Suspected Spam] [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.12.6.RC2

+1 to 1.12.6.RC2 * Build from source * WAN clusters with SSL * puts/gets * validate data integrity after rolling restart. Regards Nabarun Nag From: Owen Nichols Sent: Friday, December 10, 2021 2:08 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.12.5.RC1

+1 to 1.12.5.RC4 * WAN * Rolling restart from 1.12.4 * puts/gets * validate data integrity after rolling restart. Regards, Nabarun From: Dan Smith Sent: Friday, October 22, 2021 9:26 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache

Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrading to Lucene 7.1.0

roach allows for a more seamless (lower downtime) upgrading of system and extension components. Thoughts? --Udo From: Nabarun Nag Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 at 7:33 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrading to Lucene 7.1.0 The solution for preventing the query executi

Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrading to Lucene 7.1.0

The solution for preventing the query executions to occur in the mixed version mode also caused some problems where the query function executions get repeatedly executed and that results in stack overflow. From: Nabarun Nag Sent: Monday, September 27, 2021 2

Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrading to Lucene 7.1.0

DISCUSS] Upgrading to Lucene 7.1.0 > On Sep 27, 2021, at 11:48 AM, nabarun nag wrote: > > Recently, a commit was pushed to develop which upgraded the Lucene > version used in Apache Geode to 7.1.0. These new Lucene indexes are > not compatible with the previous versions hence i

[DISCUSS] Upgrading to Lucene 7.1.0

Hi dev team, Recently, a commit was pushed to develop which upgraded the Lucene version used in Apache Geode to 7.1.0. These new Lucene indexes are not compatible with the previous versions hence it breaks the rolling upgrade contract. We are no longer able to execute Lucene queries when there

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Geode 1.14.0

thank all the contributors that made the release possible. Regards, Nabarun Nag on behalf of the Apache Geode team

Apache Geode 1.14.0 RELEASE

quired majority of +1 votes. Apache Geode 1.14.0.RC2 has passed the vote and we will finalize the release shortly. Thanks everyone for the great work! -Nabarun Nag

[VOTE] Apache Geode 1.14.0.RC2

Hello Geode Dev Community, This is a release candidate for Apache Geode version 1.14.0.RC2. Thanks to all the community members for their contributions to this release! Please do a review and give your feedback, including the checks you performed. Voting deadline: Please note that this is an

Re: [INFO] Apache Geode 1.14.0 Release Manager

To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: [INFO] Apache Geode 1.14.0 Release Manager Hi Naba, Is there any new information about the 1.14 Geode release? Thanks in advance, Alberto From: Nabarun Nag Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 6:46 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.4.RC1

+1 based on the following: * build from source * running gfsh * starting 2 site WAN cluster with ssl security enabled * verifying data propagation from the 2 sites using puts and gets * Rolling clusters from 1.12 to the release candidate. * Rebalance operations during

Re: [DISCUSS] Backporting to support branches

y blocking review is complete? That makes the process largely identical to that of the develop branch abs removes this ambiguity of who merges and when. > On Jun 29, 2021, at 4:19 PM, Nabarun Nag wrote: > > I just do the merging to have a sanitized and approved list of PRs go into > t

Re: [DISCUSS] Backporting to support branches

. On 3/19/21, 10:47 AM, "Nabarun Nag" wrote: Just a small change, a PR against the support branch is enough. (No need to add reviewers etc.). I just realized we can filter on a branch in the PR list. Regards, Nabarun From: Nabarun Nag

Re: Fw: [DISCUSS] Rebase and Squash Options on Github develop

+1 For Naba’s proposal From: Joris Melchior Date: Tuesday, June 29, 2021 at 7:40 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: Fw: [DISCUSS] Rebase and Squash Options on Github develop +1 for Naburan’s proposed options. From: Nabarun Nag Date: Monday, June 28, 2021 at 4:06 PM To: Owen Nichols , dev

Re: [Suspected Spam] [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.12.3.RC3

+1 based on the following: * build from source * running gfsh * starting 2 site WAN cluster * verifying data propagation from the 2 sites using puts and gets * Rolling clusters from 1.12 to the release candidate. * Rebalance operations during upgrades.

Re: Fw: [DISCUSS] Rebase and Squash Options on Github develop

Just a clarification. The options I am proposing to be kept in the PRs are: * Squash and merge * Rebase and merge Regards, Nabarun From: Owen Nichols Sent: Monday, June 28, 2021 1:03 PM To: Nabarun Nag ; dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: Fw: [DISCUSS

Fw: [DISCUSS] Rebase and Squash Options on Github develop

to propose to that we set the GitHub setting on develop PR to rebase and squash buttons. Please do note that this is reversible and can be changed back, hence there is no harm in trying it out. Regards Nabarun Nag From: Owen Nichols (Pivotal) Sent: Thursday, April 9

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.3.RC1

+1 based on the following: * build from source * running gfsh * starting 2 site WAN cluster * verifying data propagation from the 2 sites using puts and gets * Rolling clusters from 1.12 to the release candidate. * Rebalance operations during upgrades. Regards, Nabarun

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove stress-new-test-openjdk11 requirement from PRs

these resolved collectively as a community. (results of the mass tests maybe). Thank you. Regards Nabarun Nag From: Kirk Lund Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2021 9:37 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Remove stress-new-test-openjdk11 requirement from PRs

Re: [INFO] Apache Geode 1.14.0 Release Manager

please provide some information about how the 1.14 release is going and if is there any planned date for it? Thanks in advance, Alberto From: Nabarun Nag Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 5:27 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: [INFO] Apache Geode 1.14.0 Release

Re: Cleaning up the codebase - use curly braces everywhere

This is great clean up idea. I think you should go for it. Regarding the check, I think we can try to incorporate it in our spotless script to fix it if we miss brackets in blocks . Regards Nabarun Get Outlook for iOS From: Donal Evans

Re: Reminder to use draft mode

I feel that Owen has a valid point and I myself feel that it is ok to start the PR in draft mode till the pre-check tests pass. There has been this situation where, * PR is created (reviewers are assigned) * approved * Tests fail * code is changed * no reviews * code is

Re: [Suspected Spam] [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.12.2.RC1

Reversing the previous -1 to a +1 Please continue the vote. * The rebalance behavior has been fixed in later releases as a part of GEODE-7830 Regards Nabarun From: Nabarun Nag Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 10:05 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Geode Committer - Kamilla Aslami

Congrats Kamila!! Welcome!!! From: Donal Evans Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 2:48 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Geode Committer - Kamilla Aslami Congrats Kamilla! From: Mark Hanson Sent: Monday, April

Re: Geode retry/acknowledge improvement

Hi Mario, Will it be possible to provide a README doc to recreate this environment to test the failure. (even a DUnit test or even scripts using baremetal GemFire will work too) Regards Naba From: Mario Ivanac Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 7:16 AM To:

Re: [Suspected Spam] [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.12.2.RC1

-1 Potential rebalance issue during upgrade to 1.12.2RC1 The investigation is ongoing. Please do give me a little more time on this. Regards Nabarun From: John Blum Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 9:40 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: [Suspected Spam]

Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface

Hi Jens, With respect to the work we did with geode-kafka-connector, we did the initial development in a private branch. (gradle dependencies on geode, separate from Geode source code) Later when we were feature complete and ready for Confluence Certification, we created a new apache repo in

Re: [Proposal] backport GEODE-8761 to support/1.14

I will handle the PR and merge into support/1.14 Thank you Darrel, Regards Nabarun From: Darrel Schneider Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 1:49 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: [Proposal] backport GEODE-8761 to support/1.14 The previous fix for GEODE-8761

Re: [DISCUSS] CODEOWNERS mechanism feedback

We will get these approved as soon as possible. Regards, Nabarun From: Mario Ivanac Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 4:17 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Odg: [DISCUSS] CODEOWNERS mechanism feedback Hi all, just to remind on this topic. Could we expand

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Geode Committer - Matt Reddington

Welcome!!  Regards Naba From: Sarah Abbey Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 11:17 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Geode Committer - Matt Reddington Congratulations, Matt!!  From: Ernie Burghardt Sent:

Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface

+1 Get Outlook for iOS From: Darrel Schneider Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 8:46:24 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface I'm in favor of its removal. I was working on

[INFO] Apache Geode 1.14.0 Release Manager

Nabarun Nag

Re: [DISCUSS] Backporting to support branches

Just a small change, a PR against the support branch is enough. (No need to add reviewers etc.). I just realized we can filter on a branch in the PR list. Regards, Nabarun From: Nabarun Nag Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 10:31 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject

[DISCUSS] Backporting to support branches

Hi, I would like to propose that if any JIRA needs to be backported to support branches: For Developers: * Add the label "blocks-1.1x" to the JIRA ticket * There is no need to send out a PROPOSAL email to dev * Just create the cherry-picked PR to the support branch and tag the

Re: PROPOSAL: Backport GEODE-9044 - Introduce RedisKey as key object for RedisData entries

+1 Get Outlook for iOS From: Jens Deppe Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 7:35:03 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: PROPOSAL: Backport GEODE-9044 - Introduce RedisKey as key object for RedisData entries This work builds on GEODE-9023 which

Re: [DISCUSS] CODEOWNERS mechanism feedback

Hi Alberto, Here are some of my opinions on this matter. "the review process is taking longer now. " I agree that the review process is taking a bit longer, but that is the price I believe needs to be paid to improve the probability of good quality code is being merged to Geode. More eyes on

Re: [Suspected Spam] RE: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.2.RC1

+1 Based on forward compatibility tests. * 1.13.2 clients we able to connect to develop locator and servers and execute data ops. * In mixed version cluster (1.13.2 and develop) locators were able to execute rebalance commands From: Dan Smith Sent:

Re: Proposal: Add GEODE-8950 (performance degradation in P2pPartitionedPutLongBenchmark) to 1.14 blockers list

+1 From: Donal Evans Sent: Friday, March 12, 2021 11:19 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Proposal: Add GEODE-8950 (performance degradation in P2pPartitionedPutLongBenchmark) to 1.14 blockers list After some investigation, it appears that a degradation has

Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-9016 to 1.14, 1.13 and 1.12

+1 Get Outlook for iOS From: Anilkumar Gingade Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 11:59:17 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-9016 to 1.14, 1.13 and 1.12 +1 to backport. On 3/11/21, 11:38 AM, "Jianxia Chen"

[Poposal] Backport GEODE-9019 to Apache Geode 1.14.0 branch

egards Nabarun Nag

Re: [DISCUSS] Geode 1.14

Added a couple of tickets with the blocker label and are now available on the dashboard. Please feel free to pick up those tasks. Do reach out if anyone needs more information. Regards Nabarun From: Alexander Murmann Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2021 7:39 AM

Re: [PROPOSAL] Change the default value of conserve-sockets to false

+1 * As nearly all of the production use-cases need "conserve-sockets" to be set to false, I think we can aim for changing the default value to false for 1.14.0 release. * We can highlight this change in the release notes and emails. Regards, Nabarun

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.1.RC2

+1 Started gfsh, created cluster, create region, entry put and get, query execution. Build from source. Regards Nabarun Nag From: Joris Melchior Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2020 12:25 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.1.RC2 +1

Geode Kafka Connector Verification and availability on Confluent Hub

effort was spearheaded by Jason Huynh, with code contributions from Donal Evans, Anthony Baker, and Nabarun Nag Thank you all for the great contributions. We have a couple of upcoming features<https://github.com/apache/geode-kafka-connector#possible-upcoming-featured> and would love cont

Re: [PROPOSAL] Backport usability improvements to support 1.13 branch

+1 From: Jason Huynh Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 4:22 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: [PROPOSAL] Backport usability improvements to support 1.13 branch Hello, I’d like to merge the pull request:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.0.RC1

+1 Based on the following tasks Clean build Starting gfsh, executing queries. meld comparison of artifacts directories. From: Jinmei Liao Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 11:16 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.0.RC1 +1 Verified

Re: Draft of August 2020 Geode report to the board

Hi Udo, I think the wrapped links appear only in outlook. In Apache archives, they appear to be medium links. Safelinks is feature enabled by default in Outlook Regards Naba Get Outlook for iOS From: Udo Kohlmeyer Sent: Sunday, August

Re: [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-8394 to support/1.13

Super +1 From: Anilkumar Gingade Sent: Friday, August 7, 2020 10:34 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-8394 to support/1.13 This causes a large object to be partially (corrupt data) stored in cache instead of throwing an exception.

RE: [VOTE] Backporting of GEODE-8261 to 1.13 release branch.

: [VOTE] Backporting of GEODE-8261 to 1.13 release branch. +1 On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:16 PM Nabarun Nag wrote: > Hi Geode devs, > > Requesting vote to backport of GEODE-8261 to 1.13 > > Why? > This commit fixes an issue with servers throwing null pointer > exceptions wh

[VOTE] Backporting of GEODE-8261 to 1.13 release branch.

Hi Geode devs, Requesting vote to backport of GEODE-8261 to 1.13 Why? This commit fixes an issue with servers throwing null pointer exceptions while a member is being shutdown and registering interest is in process. SHA 720a4caea2ddb22296aa3225fc5264d2096cdf20 Regards Nabarun

RE: Setting your commit email address

Hi Kirk, I think it is also now in the privacy setting in GitHub for anyone who wants to keep emails private. [https://github.com/settings/emails : https://github.com/settings/emails ] This setting is needed for web based git operations like squash merging PRs etc. In GitHub: "Keep my email

Re: About Geode rolling downgrade

Hi Mario and Alberto, I will sync up with couple of engineers get you a feedback within a couple of days. @Barry , Jason and I were discussing once, can your idea of WAN GII achieve the downgrade. Like create a DS with old versions and let it do a GII from the newer version cluster and then

RE: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches

Thank you Aaron. We will continue using feature branch in ASF repo for development of PR clear work. Yes, we can manage access to personal/non-ASF hosted forks but I do not have the list of people to set that up. This is automatic default when we create in ASF repositories. Also, I am

RE: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches

@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches > On Jun 2, 2020, at 4:29 PM, Nabarun Nag wrote: > > - We are maintaining feature/GEODE-7665 which is the feature branch for PR > clear work on which multiple developers are working

RE: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches

Jun 2, 2020, at 4:40 PM, Nabarun Nag wrote: > > I don’t think it is right to make the open source Geode Community to work on > my personal fork Why not? I can fork your fork. I can PR to your fork. Its sort of what Git was made for, no single source repository. Can you elaborate on

RE: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches

of the things you have specified are possible within the confines of a fork. Thanks, Mark On 6/2/20, 4:29 PM, "Nabarun Nag" wrote: - We are maintaining feature/GEODE-7665 which is the feature branch for PR clear work on which multiple developers are working on. - We are maintaining thi

RE: [DISCUSSION] Stop using the Geode Repository for Feature/WIP Branches

- We are maintaining feature/GEODE-7665 which is the feature branch for PR clear work on which multiple developers are working on. - We are maintaining this in Geode repository. - All sub-tasks of GEODE-7665 are merged into this feature branch. - Anyone in the Geode community can work on any

New blog on Spring Security & Geode by Juan Ramos

Hi Geode Community, Juan Ramos has recently published a new article on Spring Security and Apache Geode. You can read it here at https://medium.com/@jujoramos/spring-security-geode-4670faff47a0 Thank you Juan for this article. Regards Nabarun Nag

Re: [DISCUSS] enable GitHub PR blocking on API breaking changes

+1 On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 8:54 AM Donal Evans wrote: > Thanks for the explanation, Robert. Also, I realised I never explicitly > said it in my earlier post, but this is a +1 from me > > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 8:05 AM Joris Melchior > wrote: > > > This seems like a good thing to have. > > > >

Re: Our May 2020 report to the board

Thank you Dave for putting together the report !! Thank you all for putting together those amazing blogs and all the Apache Geode contributors. Regards Naba Get Outlook for iOS From: Karen Miller Sent: Monday, May 11, 2020 2:30:35 PM

Re: GitHub Project Board Applications API

in the near future. Regards Naba On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 4:28 PM Michael Oleske wrote: > What are you hoping to learn from the exploration? What hypothesis is the > experiment trying to prove/disprove? > > -michael > > On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 4:26 PM Nabarun Nag

Re: GitHub Project Board Applications API

We can ignore this board as it is not part of the agreed-upon open-source process at the moment. Regards Naba On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 4:26 PM Nabarun Nag wrote: > It is just an experiment at the moment. We are researching ways of > automating processes. It is an exploration attempt

Re: GitHub Project Board Applications API

It is just an experiment at the moment. We are researching ways of automating processes. It is an exploration attempt hence not being discussed at this point in time as we don't have all the information. Regards Naba On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 4:00 PM Michael Oleske wrote: > Hi Devs! > > I saw on

Re: [VOTE] Using Github issues and wiki for geode-kafka-connector project

s a very robust project management tools used by Apache Contributors and corporations like VMware. Regards Nabarun Nag On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 2:40 PM Anthony Baker wrote: > Having used pretty every style of wiki, I care less about the wiki tech > and more about making the content easi

[ANNOUNCE] Github Wiki and Issus are now activated on geode-kafka-connector

Hi, Issues are wiki pages are now active on the geode-kafka-connector repository. Thank you all for the kind votes. Regards Nabarun Nag

[VOTE] Using Github issues and wiki for geode-kafka-connector project

Hello team, We are planning to experiment with using Github issues and wiki for the Apache project *Geode-Kafka-Connector. *(not Apache Geode project). Please do give your vote on this as we need to send the vote link to infra to activate it. *Why are we doing this ? / Advantages* : 1. *Unified

Re: [PROPOSAL] Include fix for GEODE-7763 into release 1.12.0

+1 On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 11:41 AM Jason Huynh wrote: > Hello Dev list, > > I'd like to include a fix for GEODE-7763 in release 1.12.0. > The change removes the call to exportValue, preventing a serialization, > when no clients are waiting for the specific event. > The reason why I think it

Re: [PROPOSAL] eliminate file count loophole in PR StressNewTest

+1 On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 6:33 PM Donal Evans wrote: > With fairly apt timing, we've recently had a PR merged ( > https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/4745) that introduced a test that has > resulted in fairly consistently flaky failures in the pipeline (JIRA > ticket:

Re: [PROPOSAL] StressNewTest in Pull Request Pipeline to be made optional.

What help is needed in this effort? Regards Naba On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 11:35 AM Mark Hanson wrote: > Alright, so basically it seems like people are not ok with the not > requiring stressnewtest approach. So I guess that means that we need to > identify -1s willing to help resolve this

OQL Method Authorizer Blog

Hi Geode Community, Please do visit the blog that Juan Ramos has put up on the OQL Method Authorizer : https://jujoramos.blogspot.com/2020/02/pluggable-oql-method-authorization.html Thank you Juan for this effort. Regards Nabarun Nag

[ANNOUNCE] OQL Method Invocation Security

ce/display/GEODE/OQL+Method+Invocation+Security Regards Nabarun Nag

[ANNOUNCE] geode-kafka-connector

certified. We will highly appreciate any feedback and contributions from the community. Please do reach out to us if you have any questions or concerns. We will reach out to the community when we are ready with the first release. Regards Nabarun Nag

Re: [PROPOSAL]: Include GEODE-7789 in Release 1.12.0

+1 On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 2:09 AM Ju@N wrote: > Hello devs, > > I'd like to include the fix for GEODE-7789 [1] in release 1.12.0. > The change prevents a performance degradation introduced in Geode 1.11, it > basically shows up on clusters where there's at least one client with > subscription

Re: [PROPOSAL]: Include GEODE-7728 in Release 1.12.0

++ On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 9:54 AM Alexander Murmann wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 9:29 AM Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > > > +1 - for inclusion > > > > On 2/5/20 4:22 AM, Ju@N wrote: > > > Hello devs, > > > > > > I'd like to include the fix for GEODE-7728 [1] in release 1.12.0. > > > The

Re: WAN replication issue in cloud native environments

Hi Alberto, Thank you for the contributions to the Apache Geode project Here are a few feedback and pointers that we came up with: 1. Right now looking at your solution, we can see that you are modifying the class "ServerLocation" which is used to stored as a key in the connectionMap in

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal to require linear commit history on develop

gt;> > >>> We now have commits on develop that don’t compile. For example: > >>> > >>> git checkout 19eee7821322a1301f16bdcd31fd3b8c872a41b6 > >>> ./gradlew devBuild > >>> ...spotlessJava FAILED > >>> We implemented branch protections to make this

Re: [DISCUSS] What should we do with @Ignore tests?

). Regards Nabarun Nag On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 5:32 PM Dan Smith wrote: > Some of these test have been ignored for a long time. However, looking at > the history, I see we have ignored some tests as recently as in the last > month, for what seem like some questionable reasons. > >

Re: [DISCUSS] abandon branch protection rules

Please maintain the branch protection rules. Waiting for reviews and Unit tests to pass does not stifle productivity, but prevents us from making mistakes that are detrimental to the entire community. If I am not mistaken, we still have pushed code which broke builds and regressions. I would

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal to require linear commit history on develop

1s > > >>> above... (early voting) > > >>> > > >>> maybe we'll be better off socializing the norm of squash-and-merge > and > > >>> gaining a natural consensus that way... > > >>> > > >>> On Fri, Dec 20

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal to require linear commit history on develop

consensus that way... > > >>> > > >>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 10:07 AM Owen Nichols > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> The proposed action manifests as a commit to the Geode git > repository, > > >> so > > >>&

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal to require linear commit history on develop

Geode since the > beginning > >>>>>> and I > >>>>>>>> was never made aware of this change in our process. I never voted > on > >>>>>> it. > >>>>>>>> I'm not a big fan of changing various details in our process

  1   2   3   >