Github user oshvarts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/397
@metatype @kirklund could you move this forward please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user metatype commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/397
@kirklund any thoughts?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user oshvarts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/397
All checks completed, Travis and spotless are happy, could you accept?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user oshvarts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/397
fixed wildcards and spotless issue; hopefully fixed the unrelated test
failure, though Travis does not seem to be running builds for me to test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user metatype commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/397
The test failure doesn't seem to be related to your changes, though you
need to run `gradlew spotlessApply` to format your PR correctly. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
