June 18, 2020 10:49 AM
> To: dev@geode.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-8277 to support/1.13
>
> +100
>
> On 6/18/20, 10:46 AM, "Bruce Schuchardt" wrote:
>
> Several keystores used by a test have expired, which will cause
>
+1
On 6/18/20, 12:15 PM, "Dick Cavender" wrote:
+1
-Original Message-
From: Ernie Burghardt
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2020 10:49 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-8277 to support/1.13
+100
On 6/18/20
+1
-Original Message-
From: Ernie Burghardt
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2020 10:49 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-8277 to support/1.13
+100
On 6/18/20, 10:46 AM, "Bruce Schuchardt" wrote:
Several keystores used by a test have expi
+100
On 6/18/20, 10:46 AM, "Bruce Schuchardt" wrote:
Several keystores used by a test have expired, which will cause acceptance
tests to fail in support/1.13. I’d like to cherry-pick the new keystores into
that branch. The new keystores have a 5/2120 expiration date.
Several keystores used by a test have expired, which will cause acceptance
tests to fail in support/1.13. I’d like to cherry-pick the new keystores into
that branch. The new keystores have a 5/2120 expiration date.
