t; > Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2020 9:49 AM
> > To: dev@geode.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Back-Port GEODE-8240 to 1.12, 1.13
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On 7/1/20, 9:43 AM, "Bill Burcham" wrote:
> >
> > I'd like permission to back-port the fix for rolling upgrade bug
> > GEODE-8240
> > to support/1.12 and support/1.13
> >
> > -Bill
> >
> >
>
+1
Šalje: Kirk Lund
Poslano: 1. srpnja 2020. 19:54
Prima: dev@geode.apache.org
Predmet: Re: Back-Port GEODE-8240 to 1.12, 1.13
+1
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 9:59 AM Dick Cavender wrote:
> +1
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Schuch
+1
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 9:59 AM Dick Cavender wrote:
> +1
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Schuchardt
> Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2020 9:49 AM
> To: dev@geode.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Back-Port GEODE-8240 to 1.12, 1.13
>
> +1
>
> On 7/1/2
+1
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Schuchardt
Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2020 9:49 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: Back-Port GEODE-8240 to 1.12, 1.13
+1
On 7/1/20, 9:43 AM, "Bill Burcham" wrote:
I'd like permission to back-port the fix for rolling upgrade bug
+1
On 7/1/20, 9:43 AM, "Bill Burcham" wrote:
I'd like permission to back-port the fix for rolling upgrade bug GEODE-8240
to support/1.12 and support/1.13
-Bill
I see this fix has been well-received on develop, and getting rolling upgrade
right definitely sounds critical to me!
+1
On 7/1/20, 9:43 AM, "Bill Burcham" wrote:
I'd like permission to back-port the fix for rolling upgrade bug GEODE-8240
to support/1.12 and support/1.13
-Bill
I'd like permission to back-port the fix for rolling upgrade bug GEODE-8240
to support/1.12 and support/1.13
-Bill
