r.java:162)
at
org.apache.geode.cache.lucene.internal.LuceneBucketListener.lambda$afterPrimary$0(LuceneBucketListener.java:40)
From: John Blum
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2021 11:19 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org ; u...@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: JDK 16 Support?
Thanks Bill (everyone) for the i
From: Bill Burcham
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2021 10:54 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Cc: u...@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: JDK 16 Support?
John, this doesn't speak to the general question of JDK version support. But
the particular stack trace you showed makes me wonder if the fix for GEODE-9081
ikely
> move the baseline to Java 11 or possibly even Java 17, we are not sure
> which yet.
>
> Just want to share our findings and give advanced notice.
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
>
> From: Anthony Baker
> Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 8:
From: Anthony Baker
Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 8:14 AM
To: u...@geode.apache.org
Cc: geode
Subject: Re: JDK 16 Support?
Thanks for reporting this John. The next LTS version of Java (17) is due later
this year. I think Geode needs to at least support every LTS
Thanks for reporting this John. The next LTS version of Java (17) is due later
this year. I think Geode needs to at least support every LTS version of Java
and clearly we would need to fix errors like this. Do you see a need to support
Java 16 now?
Anthony
On May 5, 2021, at 7:57 AM, John