Re: JDK 16 Support?

2021-05-10 Thread John Blum
r.java:162) at org.apache.geode.cache.lucene.internal.LuceneBucketListener.lambda$afterPrimary$0(LuceneBucketListener.java:40) From: John Blum Sent: Monday, May 10, 2021 11:19 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org ; u...@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: JDK 16 Support? Thanks Bill (everyone) for the i

Re: JDK 16 Support?

2021-05-10 Thread John Blum
From: Bill Burcham Sent: Monday, May 10, 2021 10:54 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Cc: u...@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: JDK 16 Support? John, this doesn't speak to the general question of JDK version support. But the particular stack trace you showed makes me wonder if the fix for GEODE-9081

Re: JDK 16 Support?

2021-05-10 Thread Bill Burcham
ikely > move the baseline to Java 11 or possibly even Java 17, we are not sure > which yet. > > Just want to share our findings and give advanced notice. > > Thanks, > John > > > From: Anthony Baker > Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 8:

Re: JDK 16 Support?

2021-05-05 Thread John Blum
From: Anthony Baker Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 8:14 AM To: u...@geode.apache.org Cc: geode Subject: Re: JDK 16 Support? Thanks for reporting this John. The next LTS version of Java (17) is due later this year. I think Geode needs to at least support every LTS

Re: JDK 16 Support?

2021-05-05 Thread Anthony Baker
Thanks for reporting this John. The next LTS version of Java (17) is due later this year. I think Geode needs to at least support every LTS version of Java and clearly we would need to fix errors like this. Do you see a need to support Java 16 now? Anthony On May 5, 2021, at 7:57 AM, John