Re: Proposal to add new 'export artifacts' GFSH command

2017-01-31 Thread Swapnil Bawaskar
+1 I like the idea. However, we will have to make sure that the regex is limited to the server's working directory only. On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 5:23 PM Jens Deppe wrote: > What about simply having --exclude and --include options that take a regex > in order to exclude and

Re: Proposal to add new 'export artifacts' GFSH command

2017-01-30 Thread Swapnil Bawaskar
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > I think stats should always be included by default +1 stats should be included always. If they are not needed, users can use --include-stats=false. I'm not sure I like the --stats-only flag since the command

Re: Proposal to add new 'export artifacts' GFSH command

2017-01-30 Thread Udo Kohlmeyer
I think stats should always be included by default maybe a '--stats-only' or '--logs-only' flag... On 1/30/17 10:08, Kevin Duling wrote: +1 to the idea of '--include-stats' If --include-stats is offered, there should also be a '--stats-only' flag. That way you can get logs, logs and

Re: Proposal to add new 'export artifacts' GFSH command

2017-01-30 Thread Kevin Duling
+1 to the idea of '--include-stats' If --include-stats is offered, there should also be a '--stats-only' flag. That way you can get logs, logs and stats, or just stats. On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > > > > > > > > There are some

Re: Proposal to add new 'export artifacts' GFSH command

2017-01-26 Thread Jared Stewart
The ‘export logs’ command deals with this by having —start-time and —end-time parameters that can be used to specify a particular time window. I’m not sure whether statistics files roll over and have timestamps or not. This could be one approach to limiting the size of the data returned for

Re: Proposal to add new 'export artifacts' GFSH command

2017-01-26 Thread Udo Kohlmeyer
I agree with dan... We need to be able to limit how much data is being collected and sent. In many cases clients don't clean up the files so they might drag a lot of stuff over. On 1/26/17 13:52, Dan Smith wrote: +1 for export artifacts and +1 for zip-file I'm also generally in favor of

Re: Proposal to add new 'export artifacts' GFSH command

2017-01-26 Thread Dan Smith
+1 for export artifacts and +1 for zip-file I'm also generally in favor of gathering the artifacts on the gfsh client but I am a little concerned that in some cases that could be a lot of data going to the client (10s or 100s of GBs), especially if logs and stats aren't being cleaned up on a