Re: [DISCUSS] Improvements on client function execution API

Sorry, some corrections on my comments after revisiting the native client code. When I said that the timeout used in the execution() method (by means of a system property) was to set a read timeout on the socket, I was only talking about the Java client. In the case of the native clients, the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1

+1 On 8/28/19 5:41 PM, John Blum wrote: +1 On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 2:51 PM Dan Smith wrote: I missed this vote email as well - if we reopen the vote I'll cast one. I don't really have much context on why we want a 1.9.1 but I'm happy to double check the bits. One comment on this RC - I

Re: [DISCUSS] what region types to support in the new management rest api

Just catching up on this thread so take it FWIW. The “new management API” is intended to become the one-and-only way to configure the system. That means that eventually cache.xml, gfsh, existing API’s, etc. will only be able to configure features supported by this new API. I think the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1

+1 On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 2:37 PM Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > +1 > > On 8/28/19 5:41 PM, John Blum wrote: > > +1 > > > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 2:51 PM Dan Smith wrote: > > > >> I missed this vote email as well - if we reopen the vote I'll cast one. > I > >> don't really have much context on why

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1

I see there’s a VOTE thread for 1.9.1. Do you suggest to -1 that release candidate? Anthony > On Aug 29, 2019, at 8:53 AM, Bruce Schuchardt wrote: > > I also missed this vote email. Dan is right that creating the v1.9.1 Version > instance was unnecessary. I don't think it hurts

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1 (new vote)

+1 On 8/29/19 9:51 AM, John Blum wrote: +1 On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 9:41 AM Kirk Lund wrote: +1 (just in case my vote counts) On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 9:02 AM Kirk Lund wrote: Hello Geode dev community, This is a release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.9.1.RC1. Thanks to all the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1

Bruce, could you also update the release instructions to clarify when the serialization version should and should not be bumped? The existing instructions say always bump on every release. There is a separate thread

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1 (new vote)

+1 On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 9:41 AM Kirk Lund wrote: > +1 (just in case my vote counts) > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 9:02 AM Kirk Lund wrote: > > > Hello Geode dev community, > > > > This is a release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.9.1.RC1. > > Thanks to all the community members for

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1

I also missed this vote email.  Dan is right that creating the v1.9.1 Version instance was unnecessary.  I don't think it hurts anything per se but it does unnecessarily consume a serialization version ordinal.  That will leave us with only 3 (102, 103 and 104) if we *ever* need to issue more

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1 (new vote)

+1 (just in case my vote counts) On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 9:02 AM Kirk Lund wrote: > Hello Geode dev community, > > This is a release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.9.1.RC1. > Thanks to all the community members for their contributions to this > release! > > Please do a review and give

[VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1 (new vote)

Hello Geode dev community, This is a release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.9.1.RC1. Thanks to all the community members for their contributions to this release! Please do a review and give your feedback. The deadline is 3PM PST Tue, August 27 2019. Release notes can be found at:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1 (new vote)

What's the deadline this time? Can't be Aug 27... On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:04 AM Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > +1 > > On 8/29/19 9:51 AM, John Blum wrote: > > +1 > > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 9:41 AM Kirk Lund wrote: > > > >> +1 (just in case my vote counts) > >> > >> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 9:02

Re: [DISCUSS] Improvements on client function execution API

Hi Dan, Discussing these matters by e-mail is getting tricky. Let's see if I understand you correctly and also if I am being clear enough. Please, see my comments inline. On 29/8/19 0:49, Dan Smith wrote: > Sorry for the slow response, I've been trying to decide what I think is the > right

Re: [DISCUSSION] should the DISTRIBUTED_NO_ACK Scope be deprecated?

The use-cases I can think of are edge, mesh, IOT related, large scale streaming services where data consistency or data loss (for sometime) is not a concern; the edge/mesh computing are getting traction now a dayGeode also supports early-ack option which gives better throughput compare to

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1 (new vote)

We submitted a PR against release/1.9.1 to remove 1.9.1 from Version: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/3989 Please review. After we merge this in, we'll create RC2 and start a vote for it. Thanks, Kirk and Owen On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:53 PM Kirk Lund wrote: > Anyone want to help me

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1 (new vote)

Deadline for voting is Sept 5th. However, we have two -1 votes so RC1 is dead. @John I'm not sure we can make the deadline for SB2 now? Is it still worth trying to create RC2 for SB? On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 12:34 PM Bruce Schuchardt wrote: > -1 we should revert the 1.9.1 Version.java change on

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1 (new vote)

Anyone want to help me revert these Version changes and make an RC2? I'm not sure how to do this correctly. On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:48 PM Kirk Lund wrote: > Deadline for voting is Sept 5th. However, we have two -1 votes so RC1 is > dead. > > @John I'm not sure we can make the deadline for SB2

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1

>From my reading, bumping the ordinal in 1.9.1 will make 1.9.1 incompatible with 1.10, unless we also fix 1.10 to know about 1.9.1's ordinal. It will also make 1.9.1 clients incompatible with 1.9.0 servers, which may not be desired? I guess we just need to settle on a process. It sounds like

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1 (new vote)

+1 On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:39 AM Dave Barnes wrote: > What's the deadline this time? Can't be Aug 27... > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:04 AM Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On 8/29/19 9:51 AM, John Blum wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 9:41 AM Kirk Lund wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1

FWIW, I don't think 1.9.1 clients (or any combination of patch versions) should be incompatible with servers 1.9.patch-1 (e.g. 1.9.0). IMO, that would be very bad! major.minor client/servers, regardless of patch versions, should remain interoperable. On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 11:41 AM Owen

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1 (new vote)

-1 we should revert the 1.9.1 Version.java change on this branch and on develop On 8/29/19 9:02 AM, Kirk Lund wrote: Hello Geode dev community, This is a release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.9.1.RC1. Thanks to all the community members for their contributions to this release!

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1 (new vote)

I'm going to vote -1 until we get the Version.java issue figured out. It is sounding like we will need to revert the changes and create a new RC unless we come to an agreement that bumping the version for 1.9.1 is the right way to go. -Dan On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 11:47 AM Jens Deppe wrote: >

[DISCUSSION] should the DISTRIBUTED_NO_ACK Scope be deprecated?

Geode currently allows creating non-partitioned regions with a DISTRIBUTED_NO_ACK Scope. This causes distributed operations on the region not to wait for acknowledgement but to just send the op and assume the remote member received it. Currently gfsh gives you no way to create a region

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1

1.9.1 was added to 1.10 and develop as well, so will need to be reverted everywhere and will not be able to do the 1.10.0 RC1 today > On Aug 29, 2019, at 11:35 AM, Dan Smith wrote: > > From my reading, bumping the ordinal in 1.9.1 will make 1.9.1 incompatible > with 1.10, unless we also fix

Errored: apache/geode-examples#347 (rel/v1.9.1.RC2 - fc97f58)

Build Update for apache/geode-examples - Build: #347 Status: Errored Duration: 52 secs Commit: fc97f58 (rel/v1.9.1.RC2) Author: Owen Nichols Message: temporary commit to allow CI access to the Release Candidate staging maven View the changeset:

[VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC2

Hello Geode dev community, This is a release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.9.1.RC2. Thanks to all the community members for their contributions to this release! Please do a review and give your feedback. The deadline is 3PM PST Wed, September 04 2019. Release notes can be found at:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC2

+1 On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 5:02 PM Owen Nichols wrote: > Hello Geode dev community, > > This is a release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.9.1.RC2. > Thanks to all the community members for their contributions to this > release! > > Please do a review and give your feedback. The deadline

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC2

+1 On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 5:11 PM Kirk Lund wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 5:02 PM Owen Nichols wrote: > > > Hello Geode dev community, > > > > This is a release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.9.1.RC2. > > Thanks to all the community members for their contributions to this > >

Failed: apache/geode-native#2064 (rel/v1.9.1.RC2 - add53da)

Build Update for apache/geode-native - Build: #2064 Status: Failed Duration: 1 hr, 34 mins, and 0 secs Commit: add53da (rel/v1.9.1.RC2) Author: Dave Barnes Message: User Guide: Add a link to the official XSD declarative cache schema View the changeset:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC1 (new vote)

Final SD[G] Moore-RELEASE/2.2 GA is (tentatively) scheduled for Thurs, Sept 19th. Even still, any SD[G] Moore service release post GA (e.g. 2.2.1, 2.2.2, ..., 2.2.N) can pick up any patch release of Apache Geode 1.9.x (e.g. 1.9.1, 1.9.2, ..., 1.9.N). Additionally, SBDG 1.2 cannot go GA before

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC2

+1 On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 5:40 PM Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > +1 > > On 8/29/19 5:02 PM, Owen Nichols wrote: > > Hello Geode dev community, > > > > This is a release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.9.1.RC2. > > Thanks to all the community members for their contributions to this > release! > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.1 RC2

+1 > On Aug 29, 2019, at 5:11 PM, Ryan McMahon wrote: > > +1 > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 5:11 PM Kirk Lund wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 5:02 PM Owen Nichols wrote: >> >>> Hello Geode dev community, >>> >>> This is a release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.9.1.RC2.