Build failed in Jenkins: Geode-nightly-flaky #50

2017-06-29 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See Changes: [bschuchardt] GEODE-3052 Restarting 2 locators together causes potential locator split [eshu] GEODE-3132 EndBucketCreationMessage will not participate in a [jstewart] Fix spotless failure

Build failed in Jenkins: Geode-nightly #881

2017-06-29 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See Changes: [bschuchardt] added backwardCompatibilityTest test task [bschuchardt] GEODE-3052 Restarting 2 locators together causes potential locator split [eshu] GEODE-3132 EndBucketCreationMessage will not

Re: Review Request 60550: GEODE-3154: add geode-protobuf to expected_jars.txt

2017-06-29 Thread Udo Kohlmeyer
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60550/#review179319 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Udo Kohlmeyer On June 29, 2017, 9:39

Re: Review Request 60347: GEODE-3097: GFSH works over HTTP with SSL

2017-06-29 Thread Jared Stewart
> On June 29, 2017, 5:34 p.m., Kirk Lund wrote: > > geode-core/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/management/ConnectToLocatorSSLDUnitTest.java > > Line 63 (original), 66 (patched) > > > > > > Looks like this test has

[Spring CI] Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #601 was SUCCESSFUL (with 1908 tests)

2017-06-29 Thread Spring CI
--- Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #601 was successful. --- Scheduled 1910 tests in total. https://build.spring.io/browse/SGF-NAG-601/ -- This

Re: Review Request 60312: GEODE-2804 Cache InetAddress if configure host as ip string.

2017-06-29 Thread Hitesh Khamesra
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60312/ --- (Updated June 29, 2017, 10:27 p.m.) Review request for geode, Alexander

[GitHub] geode pull request #614: Add geode-protobuf to expected_jars

2017-06-29 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/614 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Re: Review Request 60550: GEODE-3154: add geode-protobuf to expected_jars.txt

2017-06-29 Thread Hitesh Khamesra
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60550/#review179309 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Hitesh Khamesra On June 29, 2017, 9:39

[GitHub] geode pull request #608: GEODE-3140: Removed DiskDirRule and replaced use wi...

2017-06-29 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/608 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Review Request 60550: GEODE-3154: add geode-protobuf to expected_jars.txt

2017-06-29 Thread Galen O'Sullivan
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60550/ --- Review request for geode, Alexander Murmann, Barry Oglesby, Bruce Schuchardt,

[GitHub] geode issue #608: GEODE-3140: Removed DiskDirRule and replaced use with Temp...

2017-06-29 Thread upthewaterspout
Github user upthewaterspout commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/608 +1 - I'll merge this. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] geode pull request #74: Added cache to FunctionalContextImpl

2017-06-29 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/74 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] geode pull request #589: GEODE-393: Providing cache for FunctionContext

2017-06-29 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/589 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] geode pull request #587: GEODE-2018: Added instantiators to SessionCachingFi...

2017-06-29 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/587 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Re: Review Request 60513: GEODE-3147 Set TLCommBuffer threadLocal for threads executing TXSynchronization

2017-06-29 Thread Darrel Schneider
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60513/#review179303 ---

Re: Question regarding the next release

2017-06-29 Thread Anthony Baker
The community is working hard to ensure that backwards compatibility is preserved. There are currently 2 open issues remaining to be fixed:

[GitHub] geode issue #611: GEODE-3145 Add new protocol to Geode JAR

2017-06-29 Thread galen-pivotal
Github user galen-pivotal commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/611 This has been merged in f63b9d . --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

Re: Review Request 60375: GEODE-3117: fix Gateway authentication with legacy security

2017-06-29 Thread Jinmei Liao
> On June 26, 2017, 11:58 p.m., Jinmei Liao wrote: > > geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/cache/client/internal/ConnectionFactoryImpl.java > > Line 82 (original), 82 (patched) > > > > > > since we already pass

Re: Review Request 60513: GEODE-3147 Set TLCommBuffer threadLocal for threads executing TXSynchronization

2017-06-29 Thread Eric Shu
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60513/ --- (Updated June 29, 2017, 6:39 p.m.) Review request for geode, anilkumar

[GitHub] geode issue #601: GEODE-3117: fix Gateway authentication with legacy securit...

2017-06-29 Thread kirklund
Github user kirklund commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/601 @pdxrunner thanks for finding the commented out code! I fixed it. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does

Re: Review Request 60375: GEODE-3117: fix Gateway authentication with legacy security

2017-06-29 Thread Kirk Lund
> On June 26, 2017, 11:58 p.m., Jinmei Liao wrote: > > geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/cache/client/internal/ConnectionFactoryImpl.java > > Line 82 (original), 82 (patched) > > > > > > since we already pass

Re: Review Request 60347: GEODE-3097: GFSH works over HTTP with SSL

2017-06-29 Thread Kirk Lund
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60347/#review179282 ---

Re: Review Request 60483: GEODE-3139 remove geode-core/src/main artifacts from classpath of backward-compatibility tests

2017-06-29 Thread Kirk Lund
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60483/#review179280 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kirk Lund On June 27, 2017, 10:40 p.m.,

Re: Review Request 60375: GEODE-3117: fix Gateway authentication with legacy security

2017-06-29 Thread Kirk Lund
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60375/ --- (Updated June 29, 2017, 5:29 p.m.) Review request for geode, Emily Yeh, Jinmei

Re: Review Request 60375: GEODE-3117: fix Gateway authentication with legacy security

2017-06-29 Thread Kirk Lund
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60375/#review179274 ---

RE: [GitHub] geode pull request #613: GEODE-3151: Internal Region Registration in JMX as ...

2017-06-29 Thread Dinesh Akhand
Hi Team, I want to raise the review request for the same. I created the pull request. Can some one help , How I can raise review request. Thanks, Dinesh Akhand -Original Message- From: dineshpune2006 [mailto:g...@git.apache.org] Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 7:41 PM To:

Re: Review Request 60451: GEODE-2996: adding Put handler

2017-06-29 Thread Alexander Murmann
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60451/#review179269 ---

Re: Review Request 60523: GEODE-3141 New flow: GetRegion

2017-06-29 Thread Bruce Schuchardt
> On June 28, 2017, 6:24 p.m., Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > > geode-protobuf/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/protocol/protobuf/operations/GetRegionRequestOperationHandler.java > > Lines 42 (patched) > > > > > > Does this

Re: Review Request 60523: GEODE-3141 New flow: GetRegion

2017-06-29 Thread Bruce Schuchardt
> On June 28, 2017, 4:39 p.m., Brian Rowe wrote: > > geode-protobuf/src/main/proto/region_API.proto > > Lines 119 (patched) > > > > > > I think it'd be cleaner to add these fields to the Region protobuf > > object

Re: Review Request 60523: GEODE-3141 New flow: GetRegion

2017-06-29 Thread Bruce Schuchardt
> On June 28, 2017, 6:27 p.m., Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > > geode-protobuf/src/main/proto/region_API.proto > > Lines 117 (patched) > > > > > > What does this service do? Just check if a region exists? If so, should > >

[GitHub] geode pull request #613: GEODE-3151: Internal Region Registration in JMX as ...

2017-06-29 Thread dineshpune2006
GitHub user dineshpune2006 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/613 GEODE-3151: Internal Region Registration in JMX as per config parameter Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache Geode. In order to streamline the review of the contribution

Question regarding the next release

2017-06-29 Thread Roi Apelker
Hi, Is there an expected date for release of 1.2? Are there any backward compatibility issues in this version? If so, are they documented separately from the other issues? Thanks, Roi This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs