Thank you Dan for the explanation.
Regards
Naba
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 4:34 PM Dan Smith wrote:
> Hi Naba,
>
> This sanctioned-serializable stuff is not an issue.
>
> When you removed those files from sanctioned-geode-core-serializables, they
> get rejected by the serialization filter. Look at
Build Update for apache/geode-native
-
Build: #2069
Status: Passed
Duration: 1 hr, 50 mins, and 2 secs
Commit: 8b161cc (rel/v1.9.1)
Author: Blake Bender
Message: Fix RAT version to reflect new Apache release
Co-authored-by: Jacob Barrett
View the changeset:
Build Update for apache/geode-examples
-
Build: #354
Status: Errored
Duration: 1 min and 12 secs
Commit: a02bc92 (release/1.9.1)
Author: Owen Nichols
Message: Revert "temporarily point to staging repo for CI purposes"
View the changeset:
https://github.com/ap
Build Update for apache/geode-examples
-
Build: #353
Status: Errored
Duration: 1 min and 8 secs
Commit: e3af9c7 (rel/v1.9.1)
Author: Owen Nichols
Message: Revert "temporary commit to allow CI access to the Release Candidate
staging maven"
This reverts commit
Hi Naba,
This sanctioned-serializable stuff is not an issue.
When you removed those files from sanctioned-geode-core-serializables, they
get rejected by the serialization filter. Look at the error message you see
when you remove them - it is failing to serialize a class that has a
*nested* Evicti
Build Update for apache/geode-site
-
Build: #129
Status: Errored
Duration: 12 secs
Commit: 3c1f55b (master)
Author: Dave Barnes
Message: Update for Geode 1.9.1
View the changeset:
https://github.com/apache/geode-site/compare/5c9295bed511...3c1f55bb1ece
View
Ah, ok. I think I see what you're asking about. I don't have an answer, but
someone else such as Bruce could explain it.
/Users/klund/dev/geode3 [610]$ diff
geode-core/src/main/resources/org/apache/geode/internal/sanctioned-geode-core-serializables.txt
geode-core/build/integrationTest/actualSerial
Hi Kirk,
The test does not fail.
When you run the test (testSerializable) it creates a list of serializable
classes and puts it in the actualSerializables.dat file and them compares
if all the classes listed are present in the
sanctioned-geode-core-serializables.txt.
If we did not change any seria
It's past the announced deadline and we have enough votes to close the vote.
Voting status
==
+1: 5 binding votes
* Dave Barnes (PMC member)
* John Blum (PMC member)
* Dan Smith (PMC member)
* Kirk Lund (PMC member)
* Anthony Baker (PMC Member)
+0: 1 vote
* Jens Deppe (PMC Member)
-0: ze
Changing my vote to +1.
Verified:
- No binaries in source releases
- Signatures and hashes are correct
- Correct LICENSE and NOTICE files
- Builds from source
Anthony
> On Sep 5, 2019, at 3:08 PM, Owen Nichols wrote:
>
> Hi Anthony, if your concern has been resolved to your satisfaction, wo
Hi Naba,
I failed to reproduce the problem you reported on Mac OS, and our pipeline
didn't fail this test. What OS are you running integrationTest on? Here's
the steps I followed:
1) checkout tag rel/v1.10.0.RC1
$ git checkout tags/rel/v1.10.0.RC1
2) clean, then build with unit tests
$ ./gradl
Hi Anthony, if your concern has been resolved to your satisfaction, would you
like to revise you vote before I record the final tally?
> On Sep 3, 2019, at 3:38 PM, Anthony Baker wrote:
>
> Yep, I also see that apache-geode-native-1.9.1-src.tar.gz is empty.
>
> -1 until that is fixed.
>
> Ant
+1 I added some comments on the wiki
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 9:34 AM Kirk Lund wrote:
> *interfaces -> was supposed to be "implementations"
>
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 9:33 AM Kirk Lund wrote:
>
> > +1 The planned subprojects look good. Thanks for clarifying the
> > goals/anti-goals in the RPC, e
+1
- Built from source and ran unit tests
- Used GFSH to create a locator and server and do some puts/gets
- Checked version in GFSH
- Built and ran all of the examples
- Verified SHAs and signatures
- Aaron
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 10:16 AM Nabarun Nag wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was
got it, thanks!!!
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 11:01 AM Dan Smith wrote:
> Ok, you should have access now.
>
> -Dan
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 5:01 PM Ernest Burghardt
> wrote:
>
> > echobravo
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 4:43 PM Dan Smith wrote:
> >
> > > What's your username on the wiki?
> > >
>
Ok, you should have access now.
-Dan
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 5:01 PM Ernest Burghardt
wrote:
> echobravo
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 4:43 PM Dan Smith wrote:
>
> > What's your username on the wiki?
> >
> > -Dan
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 4:36 PM Ernest Burghardt
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
Hello,
I was able to notice that after running the testSerializable JUnit test,
the generated actualSerializables.dat and the
sanctioned-geode-core-serializables.txt do not match. There are certain
classes mentioned in sanctioned-geode-core-serializables.txt that are not
present in actualSerializa
Note to anyone actually trying to build and run unit tests using the
*rel/v1.9.1.RC3* tag...
1.9.x does not contain my fix for PartitionedRegionLoadModelJUnitTest so it
may fail as it depends on your networking configuration.
The failure looks like:
*org.apache.geode.internal.cache.partit
+1 to release 1.10.0.RC1. Downloaded and reviewed contents of artifacts.
Reviewed Manifest of geode dependency jar. Used GFSH to start locator and
server.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 4:14 PM Dick Cavender wrote:
> We manually signed the apache-geode-1.10.0-src.tgz dist and uploaded the
> asc file.
>
*interfaces -> was supposed to be "implementations"
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 9:33 AM Kirk Lund wrote:
> +1 The planned subprojects look good. Thanks for clarifying the
> goals/anti-goals in the RPC, especially the anti-goal to not make it
> pluggable with different interfaces.
>
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2
+1 The planned subprojects look good. Thanks for clarifying the
goals/anti-goals in the RPC, especially the anti-goal to not make it
pluggable with different interfaces.
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 8:52 AM Aaron Lindsey wrote:
> +1 — I'm happy to see us move toward better testability for the membersh
+1 to release RC3. Downloaded and reviewed contents of artifacts. Reviewed
Manifest of geode dependency jar. Used GFSH to start locator and server.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 11:50 AM Dave Barnes wrote:
> +1
> checked the geode-native package by successfully building the library and
> the api docs.
Hi all,
First of all, thanks a lot Dan and Jacob for your feedback.
As we are getting close to the deadline I am adding here some conclusions and a
refined proposal in order to get some more feedback and if possible some voting
on the two alternatives proposed (or any other in between if you fe
+1 — I'm happy to see us move toward better testability for the membership
code!
I also left my "+1" on the wiki page comments. I noticed that the
"Lightweight RFC Process" document states that we're supposed to have
discussions on the [DISCUSS] thread:
In addition a [DISCUSS] email should be sen
24 matches
Mail list logo
