Re: [PROPOSAL] port GEODE-8385 changes to support/1.13

2020-07-29 Thread Bruce Schuchardt
This has been merged to support/1.13.  Thank you all

On 7/29/20, 12:47 PM, "Owen Nichols"  wrote:

+1

On 7/29/20, 9:56 AM, "Dave Barnes"  wrote:

+1
Thanks, Bruce.

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 8:22 AM Jianxia Chen  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 8:04 AM Bruce Schuchardt 
> wrote:
>
> > This concerns a hang during recovery from disk.  The problem was
> > introduced in 1.13.
> >
> > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FGEODE-8385data=02%7C01%7Cbruces%40vmware.com%7Ca76a0a4fc6ef4a68d39908d833f83033%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637316488341466424sdata=dwUUbXHV89tF6tRPMXD7lstv%2BspftgYdxOSru%2FhucOw%3Dreserved=0
> >
> >
>




Re: [PROPOSAL] Postpone Geode 1.14

2020-07-29 Thread Mark Bretl
+1

Should we need to drop a line to user@geode or is communicating on this
list enough once decided?

--Mark

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 7:05 AM Joris Melchior  wrote:

> +1
>
> On 2020-07-28, 7:34 PM, "Alexander Murmann"  wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> As mentioned on the previous discuss thread, I propose to hold off
> cutting
> 1.14 until we have shipped 1.13.
>
> Once we have shipped 1.13, we should discuss when we want to cut the
> 1.14
> release. The actual ship date for Geode 1.13 is important information
> for
> that conversation. Thus we cannot have that conversation before then.
>
>


Re: [PROPOSAL] port GEODE-8385 changes to support/1.13

2020-07-29 Thread Owen Nichols
+1

On 7/29/20, 9:56 AM, "Dave Barnes"  wrote:

+1
Thanks, Bruce.

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 8:22 AM Jianxia Chen  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 8:04 AM Bruce Schuchardt 
> wrote:
>
> > This concerns a hang during recovery from disk.  The problem was
> > introduced in 1.13.
> >
> > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FGEODE-8385data=02%7C01%7Conichols%40vmware.com%7C6dc421c209fd45b7d83e08d833e05917%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637316385953523320sdata=Kz5Uq0wdnE5XDcCl8hqF4%2Bmsp%2B6%2BAObXYEeUruslrR4%3Dreserved=0
> >
> >
>



Re: [PROPOSAL] port GEODE-8385 changes to support/1.13

2020-07-29 Thread Dave Barnes
+1
Thanks, Bruce.

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 8:22 AM Jianxia Chen  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 8:04 AM Bruce Schuchardt 
> wrote:
>
> > This concerns a hang during recovery from disk.  The problem was
> > introduced in 1.13.
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-8385
> >
> >
>


Re: [PROPOSAL] port GEODE-8385 changes to support/1.13

2020-07-29 Thread Jianxia Chen
+1

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 8:04 AM Bruce Schuchardt  wrote:

> This concerns a hang during recovery from disk.  The problem was
> introduced in 1.13.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-8385
>
>


Re: [PROPOSAL] port GEODE-8385 changes to support/1.13

2020-07-29 Thread Donal Evans
+1

From: Bruce Schuchardt 
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 8:04 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org 
Subject: [PROPOSAL] port GEODE-8385 changes to support/1.13

This concerns a hang during recovery from disk.  The problem was introduced in 
1.13.

https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FGEODE-8385data=02%7C01%7Cdoevans%40vmware.com%7Cd0ed0388a525424e4d4808d833d0ba84%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637316318862952224sdata=9yXYbEgFgFpRniqjytq5q7y%2FTEeb7gTBvLT8F6WoB4s%3Dreserved=0



[PROPOSAL] port GEODE-8385 changes to support/1.13

2020-07-29 Thread Bruce Schuchardt
This concerns a hang during recovery from disk.  The problem was introduced in 
1.13.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-8385



Re: [PROPOSAL] Postpone Geode 1.14

2020-07-29 Thread Joris Melchior
+1

On 2020-07-28, 7:34 PM, "Alexander Murmann"  wrote:

Hi all,

As mentioned on the previous discuss thread, I propose to hold off cutting
1.14 until we have shipped 1.13.

Once we have shipped 1.13, we should discuss when we want to cut the 1.14
release. The actual ship date for Geode 1.13 is important information for
that conversation. Thus we cannot have that conversation before then.