It's a how-to on further development. I hate to break all the related docs into
different places though.
Any feedback is welcome.
On 11/10/20, 1:54 PM, "Alexander Murmann" wrote:
Jinmei, I am still not sure I understand if this is a proposal. It's listed
under proposals but written more
+1 to backport.
From: Alexander Murmann
Date: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 at 10:52 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Backport GEODE-8536 and GEODE-8686 to 1.13.1
+1
Thanks for fixing those, Donal!
From: Donal Evans
Sent: Tuesday, November
+1
Thanks for fixing those, Donal!
From: Donal Evans
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2020 15:46
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: [PROPOSAL] Backport GEODE-8536 and GEODE-8686 to 1.13.1
Hi Geode dev,
I would like to backport the fixes for the below issues to the
Hi Geode dev,
I would like to backport the fixes for the below issues to the 1.13.1 support
branch:
GEODE-8536[1] is a StackOverflow that can occur when creating a Lucene
IndexWriter. The fix has been on develop for several weeks now without any
issues.
GEODE-8686[2] is a potential Java-level
Here is a copy of the board report submitted today, Tues. Nov 10, 2020.
Karen Miller
I work for VMware.
This email is written in my capacity as Chair of the Apache Geode PMC.
## Description:
The mission of Apache Geode is the creation and maintenance of software related
to a
Jinmei, I am still not sure I understand if this is a proposal. It's listed
under proposals but written more like a how-to.
So given the feature is still in progress. Do you want feedback on the writing
of the document or the architecture of the underlying code or both?
Looks good. And yes, I would probably make note there is active progress on
a v1.13.1.
Happy Four Year Anniversary Geode Community!
Thanks Karen!
--Mark
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 11:51 AM Anthony Baker wrote:
> Same, thanks Karen!
>
> On Nov 10, 2020, at 10:19 AM, Dave Barnes
Same, thanks Karen!
On Nov 10, 2020, at 10:19 AM, Dave Barnes
mailto:dbar...@apache.org>> wrote:
LGTM
LGTM
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 2:36 AM Alberto Gomez
wrote:
> Hi Karen,
>
> According to the membership data I'd say the Committer-to-PMC ratio is
> closer to 2:1 than to 7:4.
>
> Alberto
>
> From: Karen Miller
> Sent: Monday, November 9, 2020 8:25 PM
> To:
It's a feature still in development. Should we move the entire CMS specs to
another section?
On 11/6/20, 3:32 PM, "Alexander Murmann" wrote:
Jinmei, thanks for writing this! Can you help me understand why this is
listed under Project Proposals and Specifications?
Hi Karen,
According to the membership data I'd say the Committer-to-PMC ratio is closer
to 2:1 than to 7:4.
Alberto
From: Karen Miller
Sent: Monday, November 9, 2020 8:25 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Please review and contribute: draft of Nov 2020
11 matches
Mail list logo
