Re: Rescued Geode Protobuf

2021-05-05 Thread Udo Kohlmeyer
Thank you Michael, I’ll definitely be looking into this in the future… --Udo From: Michael Oleske Date: Thursday, May 6, 2021 at 9:22 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Rescued Geode Protobuf Hi Geode Friends! Since I didn't see any movement on rescuing Geode Protobuf into another

Rescued Geode Protobuf

2021-05-05 Thread Michael Oleske
Hi Geode Friends! Since I didn't see any movement on rescuing Geode Protobuf into another repository, I went ahead and did that. It seemed like a better idea to me than trying to search commit history or old branches with git. It is located at https://github.com/moleske/geode-protobuf I'm

[DRAFT] Geode Board Report

2021-05-05 Thread Dave Barnes
This is a review draft of our report to the Apache Board on the Geode project. Please send me your feedback by Monday, May 10. In particular, let me know if I omitted any publications or community outreach efforts. Thanks, Dave ## Description: The mission of Apache Geode is the creation and

Re: DISCUSSION: Geode Native C++ Style and Formatting Guide

2021-05-05 Thread Jacob Barrett
Clang format and clang-tidy are enforcing many Google C++ rules and our deviations from that. None of those tools enforce naming conventions. I am not so much looking for this to be a holy war, nor do I think it has even remotely degraded to that. The original post was to agree on the set of

Re: DISCUSSION: Geode Native C++ Style and Formatting Guide

2021-05-05 Thread Ernie Burghardt
What are we missing/unable to format with our clang-tools? These style discussions tend to become holy wars, hopefully we can avoid this... if we can tool are largest concerns and perform good PR reviews looking for valid algorithms, good mnemonics naming variables and such I think we'll be

Re: Today's Community Meeting

2021-05-05 Thread Alexander Murmann
Sorry, our next meeting won't be April 2nd, but June 2nd. Apparently, I've lost all sense of time during the pandemic. From: Alexander Murmann Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 09:39 To: geode Subject: Today's Community Meeting Hi everyone! It was great to see so

Today's Community Meeting

2021-05-05 Thread Alexander Murmann
Hi everyone! It was great to see so many folks attend our first community meeting today and contribute to the discussion. An especially big thank you goes to Alberto Gomez for presenting his

Re: JDK 16 Support?

2021-05-05 Thread John Blum
Hi Anthony- Thank you for the quick reply. The Spring Data Team is currently looking ahead towards Java 16 when building and running Spring Data examples to get a sense for what works and what doesn't, now that Java 16 is GA along with anticipation for users with questions or problems.

Re: JDK 16 Support?

2021-05-05 Thread Anthony Baker
Thanks for reporting this John. The next LTS version of Java (17) is due later this year. I think Geode needs to at least support every LTS version of Java and clearly we would need to fix errors like this. Do you see a need to support Java 16 now? Anthony On May 5, 2021, at 7:57 AM, John

JDK 16 Support?

2021-05-05 Thread John Blum
What is the plan to support Java 16 for Apache Geode? Timeframe? Running Apache Geode on a Java 16 Runtime produces errors like the following: - org.apache.geode.InternalGemFireException: unable to retrieve underlying byte buffer - at

Re: Odg: Geode retry/acknowledge improvement

2021-05-05 Thread Alberto Gomez
Please, disregard my last e-mail. I was having a parallel conversation by e-mail with Mario on this topic and sent the e-mail to the list by mistake. BR, Alberto From: Alberto Gomez Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 11:29 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re:

Odg: Odg: Geode retry/acknowledge improvement

2021-05-05 Thread Mario Ivanac
I think that this is enough. Šalje: Alberto Gomez Poslano: 5. svibnja 2021. 11:29 Prima: dev@geode.apache.org Predmet: Re: Odg: Geode retry/acknowledge improvement You could answer to their latest e-mail to confirm that Darrel's suspicion could happen. Let's

Re: Odg: Geode retry/acknowledge improvement

2021-05-05 Thread Alberto Gomez
You could answer to their latest e-mail to confirm that Darrel's suspicion could happen. Let's see if in that case they are willing to collaborate. Alberto From: Mario Ivanac Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 11:28 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Odg: Odg:

Odg: Odg: Geode retry/acknowledge improvement

2021-05-05 Thread Mario Ivanac
Hi, I think that we have problem that Darrel was suspicious, and that some kind of notification could be send from peer-to-peer to acknowledge that message is received on receiving side. Regarding test with ip tables, execution gets stuck with conserve-sockets set to false or true. BR, Mario

Re: Region data corruption due to missing PdxTypes

2021-05-05 Thread Mario Salazar de Torres
Hi, I forgot to mention that I enabled ON_DISCONNECT_CLEAR_PDXTYPEIDS property. Also, I tried a different scenario which does not exactly involves local PdxType retention, which is: 1. Start a cluster with 1 locator and 3 servers, and persistence is disabled for PdxTypes. 2. Setup a