Re: PROPOSAL: Remove WAN TX Batching Serialization Changes

2021-09-21 Thread Jacob Barrett
> On Sep 21, 2021, at 2:32 PM, Anilkumar Gingade wrote: > Is the idea just creating the Jira tickets? It is not clear from here, if it > will be owned and completed by 1.15. I will create two tickets: 1) To address 1.14 and anyone can pick this up, but if nobody does I will. 2) To block 1.15

Re: PROPOSAL: Remove WAN TX Batching Serialization Changes

2021-09-21 Thread Anilkumar Gingade
+1. Is the idea just creating the Jira tickets? It is not clear from here, if it will be owned and completed by 1.15. -Anil. On 9/21/21, 2:13 PM, "Jacob Barrett" wrote: Devs, In addition to my discussion regarding the modularization of the WAN TX batching implementation I would

PROPOSAL: Remove WAN TX Batching Serialization Changes

2021-09-21 Thread Jacob Barrett
Devs, In addition to my discussion regarding the modularization of the WAN TX batching implementation I would like to propose that we remove the serialization changes that went into 1.14 to support it. Since the feature is not complete in 1.14 this should only impact the associated tests in

Re: [DISCUSS] Modularizing new WAN TX Batching (and Modularization Efforts in General)

2021-09-21 Thread Jacob Barrett
Shoot I have a personal appointment that day I can’t move at that time. We could schedule a special session for this or move the community meeting to a different day. I could do Monday or Tuesday that week at 9:00 am PDT. > On Sep 21, 2021, at 8:14 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: > > I know we have

Re: [DISCUSS] Modularizing new WAN TX Batching (and Modularization Efforts in General)

2021-09-21 Thread Anthony Baker
I know we have folks spread across different time zones, would a 9AM PST / 4PM UTC discussion work? Yes, we will post the recording afterwards but that makes it hard to ask live questions :-) Anthony > On Sep 21, 2021, at 12:14 AM, Alberto Gomez wrote: > > I think this is a great

Re: [DISCUSS] Modularizing new WAN TX Batching (and Modularization Efforts in General)

2021-09-21 Thread Alberto Gomez
I think this is a great initiative. Not only are you giving a reminder about the need to implement new features in a modular and pluggable way, but you are also providing a real example with an already implemented not in the best way feature, to show the steps to follow in the right direction