Re: ASF Quarterly report - please review by Tuesday Noon

I would add info about the Geode sessions at the SpringOne conference. "The SpringOne Platform conference in December 2017 included 12 talks [1] on Apache Geode. The talks were given by users and developers of Geode, covering uses cases, extensions, and integration stories. All the talks

Re: Updating dependencies

[1] https://github.com/blog/2470-introducing-security-alerts-on-github > [2] https://snyk.io/ > > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I’ve got a PR [1] open that updates lots of dependencies. Please re

Updating dependencies

Hi all, I’ve got a PR [1] open that updates lots of dependencies. Please review and let me know if you have any concerns. I’d like to merge it early next week barring any objections. Thanks, Anthony [1] https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/1400

Next release: 1.5.0

Hi all, Nice work on getting the 1.4.0 release out the door! Next up is 1.5.0. Any one want to volunteer for release manager? If you haven’t done this before and would like to try, please review [1]. I’ve been advocating for more frequent releases. I’d love see a March release—which means

Re: [PROPOSAL] Add mod and arithmetic functionality to OQL

Will the OQL engine obey operator precedence rules? Anthony > On Feb 6, 2018, at 10:22 AM, Jason Huynh wrote: > > This is a proposal to add the ability to execute arithmetic operations on > numeric fields in an OQL query. The corresponding jira ticket is: >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committers and PMC members - Michael Dodge and Brian Rowe

Welcome to Geode! > On Jan 31, 2018, at 1:52 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > > The Apache Geode Project Management Committee has invited Brian Rowe and > Michael "Sarge" Dodge to join the Geode PMC and we are pleased to announce > they have accepted. > > Please join me in welcoming

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode release - 1.4.0 RC2

+1 - tested binary distribution - built from source - ran examples - release pipeline is green - checked for binaries in source - verified sigs and sha's Anthony > On Jan 29, 2018, at 4:08 PM, Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > > After fixing the security concerns in the first

Re: jacocoTestReport

Specify `-PcodeCoverage=true` on your build command. > On Jan 26, 2018, at 9:42 AM, Kirk Lund wrote: > > gradle/code-analysis.gradle contains configuration for the jacoco plugin, > but if I attempt to execute the standard jacoco task jacocoTestReport, our > build just fails

Re: Addition of rmi-io library

Mike, ?? I think you meant 1.4.0 ?? Let’s keep the release discussion on the VOTE thread. IMO, adding another port has implications for security, firewalls, containers, bind addresses, etc. I haven’t cast my release vote yet since I’m still considering these things. Anthony > On Jan 24,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode release - 1.4.0 RC1

Reviewed: - tags - maven repo - builds from source, also geode-examples - checked for binaries The pom added this dependency: org.slf4j slf4j-api 1.7.24 runtime and then this exclusion for the the log4j-slf4j-impl dependency:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode release - 1.4.0 RC1

Here’s a better URL for release notes that doesn’t require logging in: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318420=12341842 Let’s start crowd-sourcing a condensed version here:

Re: build is broken

t;>>> I have it working now. My IntelliJ project was using JDK1.8.0_66 for >>> Gradle >>>> which prevented updating of dependencies which then caused compilation >> in >>>> IntelliJ to fail on that new dependency. >>>> >>>> This

Re: build is broken

I just ran `gradle clean build` from HEAD and did not get any errors. > On Jan 23, 2018, at 10:08 AM, Jens Deppe wrote: > > The dependency is the rmi-io library. It provides functionality for > streaming data over RMI. > > It was added a few weeks ago, so I'm not sure why

[SECURITY] CVE-2017-12622 Apache Geode gfsh authorization vulnerability

CVE-2017-12622 Apache Geode gfsh authorization vulnerability Severity: Important Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation Versions Affected: Apache Geode 1.0.0 through 1.2.1 Description: When an authenticated user connects to a Geode cluster using the gfsh tool with HTTP, the user is able to

[SECURITY] CVE-2017-9796 Apache Geode OQL bind parameter vulnerability

CVE-2017-9796 Apache Geode OQL bind parameter vulnerability Severity: Important Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation Versions Affected: Apache Geode 1.0.0 through 1.2.1 Description: A malicious user with read access to specific regions within a Geode cluster may execute OQL queries

[SECURITY] CVE-2017-9795 Apache Geode OQL method invocation vulnerability

CVE-2017-9795 Apache Geode OQL method invocation vulnerability Severity: Important Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation Versions Affected: Apache Geode 1.0.0 through 1.2.1 Description: A malicious user with read access to specific regions within a Geode cluster may execute OQL queries that

Re: Next release: 1.4.0

I’ve updated the Jenkins nightly and release jobs. Please ping me if you have any questions. Anthony > On Jan 5, 2018, at 10:00 AM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > +1 > > It should be pretty easy to clone the current pipeline for the 1.4.0 release >

Re: Next release: 1.4.0

t;> What sort of update? I know that GEODE-4010 has a PR that's awaiting >>>>>> review and merge. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sarge >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 28 Nov, 2017, at 10:03, Swapnil Bawaskar <sbawas...@pivotal.io

Re: Apache Geode repos

You got them all. > On Dec 28, 2017, at 6:19 PM, Kirk Lund wrote: > > Do we have any other repos besides the following? > > geode-examples.git > geode.git > geode-native.git > geode-site.git > > The gitbox jira comment changes should now be completed on all of the above. >

ApacheGeode sessions from SpringOne now available

If you want to catch up on the Apache Geode sessions from SpringOne, here’s a playlist for you: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLt2NoB8IoXfIgG2rxSFoeoGO7CVTmsrAz Enjoy! Anthony

Re: Board Reports

The latest geode report is at https://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2017/board_minutes_2017_08_16.txt. You can review all ASF reports at https://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html. Anthony > On Dec 19, 2017, at 10:15 AM, Michael Stolz wrote: > > It

Re: [DISCUSS] changes to registerInterest API

I think Dan’s suggestion clarifies the intent. Anthony > On Nov 30, 2017, at 3:54 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > > I think it should be registerInterestAll(Iterablekeys) to mirror > Collection.addAll. > > I could easily see a user creating their own Tuple class or using one that >

Re: [DISCUSS] FunctionAdapter incompatible serialVersionUID

I think we should wait for a major release to remove API’s. If we broke a public API, we should fix that IMO. Anthony > On Nov 28, 2017, at 11:40 AM, Patrick Rhomberg wrote: > > +1 to removing a long-deprecated class from the Geode side. > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at

Re: Next release: 1.4.0

Bump. Any volunteers? If not, I’ll do this. Anthony > On Nov 22, 2017, at 1:48 PM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > We released Geode 1.3.0 at the end of October. Our next release will be > 1.4.0. Questions: > > 1) Who wants to volunteer as a release

Next release: 1.4.0

We released Geode 1.3.0 at the end of October. Our next release will be 1.4.0. Questions: 1) Who wants to volunteer as a release manager? 2) What do we want to include in the release? 3) When do we want to do this? IMO, let's should shoot for an early Dec release. Anthony

Re: Permissions To View Builds?

Try this: https://builds.apache.org/job/Geode-nightly/ :-) > On Nov 7, 2017, at 12:35 PM, Michael William Dodge wrote: > > I tried to check on the nightly builds via > https://builds.apache.org/jobs/Geode-nightly/ > . I think

Re: [DISCUSS] CI improvements

jobs please request on the dev@g.a.o mailing list (same as for Jenkins) and include your GitHub id. What do you think? Anthony > On Oct 6, 2017, at 7:08 AM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I’d like to propose the following that we switch our continu

Re: Geode Nightly issue

I pushed a fix to restore the releaseType. > On Oct 31, 2017, at 9:45 AM, Dick Cavender wrote: > > It appears that Swap's merge of release/1.3 branch to develop yesterday > introduced the problem seen in last night's nightly build. We have a fix to > commit shortly. > >

Re: 1.3.0 release in JIRA

Done! > On Oct 30, 2017, at 2:43 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > > Can someone please mark 1.3.0 as RELEASED in JIRA? I don't seem to have > permission. > > Thanks! > Swapnil.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode release - 1.3.0 RC4

- Checked sigs and hashes - Binaries and source have same commit sha - Maven looks good - No binaries in source +1 Anthony > On Oct 26, 2017, at 11:54 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > > This is the fourth release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.3.0. > Thanks to all

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode release - 1.3.0 RC4

From the release steps page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Release+Steps ./gradlew -PgeodeReleaseUrl=https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geode/{version}.RC# -PgeodeRepositoryUrl=https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeode-{} build runAll

Re: questions on licenses and code in Apache Geode

Hi Luisa, I think your question would be best handled by the cloud foundry build pack team. Here’s a slack channel that might be helpful: https://cloudfoundry.slack.com/messages/C03F5ELTK/ Anthony > On Oct 26, 2017, at 1:38 AM, Luisa Pace wrote: > > Hi team, > I

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode release - 1.3.0 RC3

svn commit had failed. The geode distribution should be > available now. > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:32 PM Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > >> The dist location only has the examples. Where are the geode >> distributions? >> >> Anthony >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode release - 1.3.0 RC3

ry I forgot to update it for the latest release candidate. > > Also, I ended up dropping and then re-adding all distributions > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geode/1.3.0.RC3 > Can you please give this another try? > > Thanks! > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 9:30 PM Anthony Baker

Re: Native client examples

017, at 10:17 AM, Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > Anthony, I don't see the relevance of the thread you mention. Can you > please explain how a discussion on tagging releases in JIRA relates to this > discussion? > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:06 AM Anthony Bake

Re: Native client examples

Before we start this thread again, please read [1]. Anthony [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geode-dev/201701.mbox/%3cdb3f0e86-1d8f-4acc-8323-fe8c135b3...@pivotal.io%3e

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode release - 1.3.0 RC3

I’m confused about which source tag we are voting on. ~/code/incubator-geode ((rel/v1.3.0.RC3))$ git tag -v rel/v1.3.0.RC3 object 59f2a73d108101744ed7b2d88e8d1c948d19781c type commit tag rel/v1.3.0.RC3 tagger Swapnil Bawaskar 1508355792 +0530 Release candidate 3 for 1.3.0

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode release - 1.3.0 RC2

, I would think that it enables us > to release independently. Can you elaborate on why not including examples > makes it -1 for you? > > Yes, I will update geode-examples to expect a tgz filename before cutting a > 1.3.0 release of examples. > > On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 8:52

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Geode-release #93

I think the Geode-release job config needs to updated to match Geode-nightly. That should fix the publish error below (the build was actually successful!). Anthony > On Oct 14, 2017, at 3:55 AM, Apache Jenkins Server > wrote: > > See >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode release - 1.3.0 RC2

-1 The geode-examples source should be included in this release. The download task in the geode-examples build also needs to be updated since the distribution archive name has changed from .tar.gz to .tgz. Are there any other downstream dependencies affected by this change? Anthony > On

Re: version for JIRA tickets?

Fixed! https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/GEODE/versions/12341842 Anthony > On Oct 13, 2017, at 8:16 AM, Bruce Schuchardt wrote: > > I see that the build version has been bumped to 1.4.0 on develop

Re: [Discuss] Geode gradle plugin

Have you looked at https://plugins.gradle.org/docs/submit ? Anthony > On Oct 11, 2017, at 7:56 PM, Jared Stewart wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've been working on a Gradle plugin to make it easier to write integration > tests for

Re: Mailing list subscription request

Welcome! Please see [1] for how to subscribe. Anthony [1] http://apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html > On Oct 12, 2017, at 3:43 AM, Arun Yadav wrote: > > Regards > Arun > > Sent from ProtonMail mobile

Re: [DISCUSS] CI improvements

Comments inline > On Oct 6, 2017, at 11:51 AM, Mark Bretl wrote: > > Correct, there is no requirement from ASF about where to run CI or even to > run CI. I am all for the best tools and stable (and repeatable) > environments. I would be open to seeing how Concourse could

[DISCUSS] CI improvements

Hi all, I’d like to propose the following that we switch our continuous integration (CI) system from Jenkins [1] to Concourse [2]. I suggest this because we continue to experience a significant number of environmental-related test failures. These issues include CPU interference from other

[SECURITY] CVE-2017-9797 Apache Geode client/server authentication vulnerability

CVE-2017-9797 Apache Geode client/server authentication vulnerability Severity: Medium CVSS Base Score 6.5 (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H) Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation Versions Affected: Apache Geode 1.0.0 through 1.2.0 Description: When a cluster is operating in

[SECURITY] CVE-2017-9794 Apache Geode gfsh query vulnerability

CVE-2017-9794 Apache Geode gfsh query vulnerability Severity: Low CVSS Base Score 3.5 (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N) Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation Versions Affected: Apache Geode 1.0.0 through 1.2.0 Description: When a cluster is operating in secure mode, a user with

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Geode 1.2.1

is available at: http://geode.apache.org/docs/guide/latest/about_geode.html We would like to thank all the contributors that made the release possible. Regards, Anthony Baker on behalf of the Apache Geode team

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Geode release - v1.2.1 RC4

The vote passes with 4 +1 votes (3 binding). +1 Dan Smith (binding) +1 William Markito Oliveira (binding) +1 Karen Miller (binding) +1 Dick Cavender Vote thread:

[VOTE] Apache Geode release - v1.2.1 RC4

This is the fourth release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.2.1. Thanks to all the community members for their contributions to this release! *** Please download, test and vote by Wednesday, September 20, 0800 hrs US Pacific. *** It fixes the following issues:

Re: 1.3.0 release

uld like to volunteer to be the release manager. > > Thanks! > > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 2:24 PM Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I think we should begin discussing scope and timeline for the 1.3.0 >> release. I k

[CANCEL][VOTE] Apache Geode release - v1.2.1 RC3

Cancelling due to problems in the source distributions (the official release bits). Anthony > On Sep 11, 2017, at 2:03 PM, Anthony Baker <aba...@apache.org> wrote: > > This is the third release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.2.1. > Thanks to all the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode release - v1.2.1 RC3

/internal/cache/tier/sockets/command: > GetPDXIdForType.java.orig > apache-geode-src-1.2.1: geode-protobuf > apache-geode-src-1.2.1: security.json > > These were found using this release check project: > https://github.com/upthewaterspout/geode-release-check > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:02 PM,

1.3.0 release

Hi all, I think we should begin discussing scope and timeline for the 1.3.0 release. I know we’re still finalizing 1.2.1, but we released 1.2.0 almost two months ago and we’ve fixed almost 200 issues in that time. IMO, we should complete 1.2.1 and then immediately turn around 1.3.0.

Re: [DISCUSS] Addition of isValid API to Index interface

I’m confused. Once a cache update has been distributed to other members it can’t be undone. That update could have triggered myriad other application behaviors. Anthony > On Sep 11, 2017, at 2:04 PM, Michael Stolz wrote: > > Great, that's exactly the behavior I would

Re: Geode sessions at SpringOne Platform conference

Hi Jagdish, Thanks for sharing this information! I think this looks like a great event. If you have a banner, text, or other assets to share that would make it easier to update the website. Could you also kindly review the ASF branding and trademark guidelines [1] [2] [3] to ensure proper

[CANCEL][VOTE] Apache Geode release - v1.2.1 RC1

Cancelling the vote on this release candidate due to concerns about breaking backwards compatibility in a patch release. Anthony > On Aug 25, 2017, at 3:20 PM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > This is the first release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.2.1.

Re: [Discuss] Use of -1 as Infinite/All for retry related functions...

es > Y.doSomething(); <- do it forever > > Very clear and no sentinel values. > > -Jake > > > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:50 PM Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > >> >>> On Sep 6, 2017, at 2:29 PM, Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io> wr

Re: [Discuss] Use of -1 as Infinite/All for retry related functions...

> On Sep 6, 2017, at 2:29 PM, Jacob Barrett wrote: > > Ok, I did not find that previous message at all clarifying but I did find > this one clarifying. I think the objective is to provide a clear and understandable API. IMO, a ReallyBigNumber is not easily readable. Is

Re: Need suggestion for exception expected but was

Please provide steps to reproduce this issue, or logs that can help us better diagnose the problem. > On Sep 6, 2017, at 9:48 AM, dinesh 1004 <dineshpune2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I am using geode 1.2 > > Thanks > Dinesh > > On 6 Sep 2017 20:51, "Antho

Re: Need suggestion for exception expected but was

What version of Geode is this? Did you change the log4j version? Anthony > On Sep 6, 2017, at 7:47 AM, Dinesh Akhand wrote: > > java.lang.Exception: Unexpected exception, > expected but > was > at >

Re: DISCUSS : Monitor the neighbour JVM using neihbour's member-timeout (GEODE-3411)

Are you intending to use server groups to divide the cluster into different logical groupings? Unless the groups host entirely separate data sets I could see an asymmetric response pattern depending if the primary was hosted on a member with a short / long timeout. Anthony > On Sep 6, 2017,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode release - v1.2.1 RC1

Ok, I understand and agree this approach, even though it means spinning another RC. Other thoughts? Anthony > On Sep 5, 2017, at 11:04 AM, Michael Stolz wrote: > > GEODE-3249 is a breaking change to the client/server protocol, but it has a > property that can override

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-15001 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-15001>. Anthony > On Aug 22, 2017, at 10:43 AM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > >> On Aug 7, 2017, at 6:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@sh

[CANCEL][VOTE] Apache Geode release - v1.2.1 RC1

t; > On 8/29/17 12:07 PM, Anthony Baker wrote: >> >> I encourage the PMC members to review and vote so we can close out this >> release. Of course, all feedback is welcome. >> >> Thanks, >> Anthony >> >>> On Aug 25, 2017, at 3:20 PM, Anthony B

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode release - v1.2.1 RC1

Hi Mike! Thanks for your feedback. IMHO I don't consider GEODE-3249 to break client/server compatibility since there's a mechanism to disable the protocol change to allow clients to be upgraded. The process would look like this: 1) Upgrade servers and set the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode release - v1.2.1 RC1

I encourage the PMC members to review and vote so we can close out this release. Of course, all feedback is welcome. Thanks, Anthony > On Aug 25, 2017, at 3:20 PM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > This is the first release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.2.1.

[VOTE] Apache Geode release - v1.2.1 RC1

This is the first release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.2.1. Thanks to all the community members for their contributions to this release! *** Please download, test and vote by Wednesday, August 25, 0800 hrs US Pacific. *** It fixes the following issues:

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

> On Aug 7, 2017, at 6:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > Hi! > > it has just come to my attention that Gitbox at ASF > has been enabling full GitHub workflow (with being > able to click Merge this PR button, etc.) for quite > some time. > > This basically allows a

Re: [DISCUSS] authorizing function execution

> On Aug 17, 2017, at 1:41 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > > Which means > the develop needs a way override the permission level *before* the function > executes. I agree. Providing a callback to allow a user to override the default security level seems reasonable. Anthony

Re: Permission to assign and close JIRA tickets

done > On Aug 15, 2017, at 9:39 AM, Alexander Murmann <amurm...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > amurmann > > Thanks! > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > >> What’s your JIRA username? >> >>> On Aug 15,

Re: Permission to assign and close JIRA tickets

What’s your JIRA username? > On Aug 15, 2017, at 8:40 AM, Alexander Murmann wrote: > > Good morning, > > Can I please get permission to assign JIRA tickets to myself as well as > close them? > > Thank you!

[]DISCUSS] Using package names to identify public API's

We have policies in place for versioning [1] and backwards compatibility [2]. How do we identify which API’s need to be controlled? In many cases we use the *.internal.* package naming format to signal API’s that aren’t subject to backwards compatibility requirements. API’s within these

Re: Review Request 61562: GEODE-3423: Provide support for running parallel docker builds in Jenkins

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61562/#review182715 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Anthony Baker On Aug. 10, 2017, 9:16

Re: Review Request 61562: GEODE-3423: Provide support for running parallel docker builds in Jenkins

) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/61562/#comment258593> We can't embedd/redistribute the Oracle JDK due to licensing. We should use the openjdk:8 as a base image (see https://hub.docker.com/_/openjdk/). - Anthony Baker On Aug. 10, 2017, 5:34 p.m., Jens Deppe

Re: [DRAFT] Geode Board Report August 2017

LGTM > On Aug 9, 2017, at 2:01 PM, Mark Bretl wrote: > > Looks good to me. Thanks Dan for taking the time to create the draft. > > If there are no issues, then I will post this EOD PST. > > --Mark > > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Dan Smith wrote: >

Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow

+1 > On Aug 8, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Mark Bretl wrote: > > +1 for Gitbox > > I have been watching threads on INFRA list and been waiting to see when a > good time would be to introduce the idea to the community. The Gitbox > project has been going since the end of 2016 and

Re: Ability to push to dockerhub

done > On Aug 9, 2017, at 12:40 PM, Jens Deppe wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like the ability to push to the 'apachegeode' dockerhub repository in > order to publish various docker images used for building Geode. My > dockerhub account is 'jensdeppe'. > > Thanks > --Jens

Re: [DISCUSS] Feature branch cleanup

+1 I did this awhile back. Once you’ve finished work on a feature branch please remove it. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2003505/how-do-i-delete-a-git-branch-both-locally-and-remotely Anthony > On Aug 2, 2017, at 9:54 PM, Nabarun Nag wrote: > > Branch Name > Ticket >

Re: Apache Geode Native Client 32 bit build and OQL question

One approach is to use Continuous Queries (CQ) to receive push notifications for all changes matching a predicate. > On Jul 27, 2017, at 9:34 AM, Rupert St John Webster > wrote: > > I also have a quick question about OQL -> how to get the most recent update >

Re: JIRA Assignment Permissions Request

done > On Jul 26, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Juan José Ramos <jra...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > Hello Anthony, > > I forgot to include that, sorry. My username is jujoramos. > Cheers. > > On Wed 26 Jul 2017 at 18:25, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: >

Re: JIRA Assignment Permissions Request

Welcome! What is your JIRA username? Anthony > On Jul 26, 2017, at 3:43 AM, Ju@N wrote: > > Hello team, > > Can I get permissions to assign Geode Tickets to myself in JIRA?. > Cheers. > > -- > Ju@N

Re: New Committer And PMC Member: Joey McAllister

Welcome Joey! > On Jul 25, 2017, at 11:58 AM, Mark Bretl wrote: > > The Apache Geode Project Management Committee has invited Joey McAllister to > be committer on the project and join the Geode PMC. We are pleased to > announce he has accepted. > > Please join me in

Re: Review Request 61114: GEODE-3296: Speed up Acceptance Tests

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61114/#review181359 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Anthony Baker On July 25, 2017, 4:58

Re: Need to know complete execution time for geode-core Junit tests

You might want to get a few thread dumps to see if there is a hung test. Also, make sure you have sufficient RAM. Anthony > On Jul 25, 2017, at 1:13 AM, Dinesh Akhand wrote: > > Hi Team, > > I trigger the geode-core Junit tests . it keeping running from last 3 hour. >

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Geode 1.2.0

/guide/about_geode.html We would like to thank all the contributors that made the release possible. Regards, Anthony Baker on behalf of the Apache Geode team

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Geode release - v1.2.0 RC2

Krone Vote thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geode-dev/201707.mbox/%3cCAEwge-E4TntkPBZc1h7_CnGuW-97cm=00wtjqcu5ki9gfma...@mail.gmail.com%3e Thanks, Anthony On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > This is the second release candidate f

Re: New Committer: Deepak Dixit

Welcome Deepak! Anthony Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 14, 2017, at 4:46 PM, Mark Bretl wrote: > > The Apache Geode Project Management Committee has invited Deepak Dixit to > be committer on the project. We are pleased to announce he has accepted. > > Please join me in

Re: Stored procedures on Apache Geode.

A geode Function is conceptually similar to a stored proc but the implementation is different. It's a java class that would use geode apis to execute logic within the cluster. Anthony > On Jul 12, 2017, at 11:13 PM, marios390 > wrote: > > Hi, > > I

[VOTE] Apache Geode release - v1.2.0 RC2

This is the second release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.2.0. Thanks to all the community members for their contributions to this release! This release candidate fixes a number of backwards compatibility and rolling upgrade issues found in RC1. *** Please download, test and vote by

Re: Question regarding the next release

The community is working hard to ensure that backwards compatibility is preserved. There are currently 2 open issues remaining to be fixed:

Re: New Apache commons-validato.jar

Thanks for the heads up. It’s Apache licensed so no problems with that. To add it to the runtime classpath you’ll need to modify geode-assembly/build.gradle and fix the expected_jars.txt file. Anthony > On Jun 27, 2017, at 9:58 AM, Hitesh Khamesra > wrote: > >

[CANCEL][VOTE] Apache Geode release - v1.2.0 RC1

This vote is cancelled due to GEODE-3095, GEODE-3092. Anthony > On Jun 17, 2017, at 2:57 PM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > Thanks Mike! Here’s the corrected text: > > This is the first release candidate for Apache Geode, version > 1.2.0. Thanks to a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode release - v1.2.0 RC1

693A 7F74 ABBE 19DB CAEE C72C FB64 Anthony > On Jun 17, 2017, at 2:35 PM, Michael Stolz <mst...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > That shouldn't say incubating should it? > > -- > Mike Stolz > Principal Engineer - Gemfire Product Manager > Mobile: 631-835-4771 > >

Re: release 1.2

> On Jun 14, 2017, at 4:59 PM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > Agreed. Please merge to release/1.2.0 when ready. > > Anthony > Hi everyone, Please contribute to the ‘crowd-sourced’ releases notes at: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEO

[VOTE] Apache Geode release - v1.2.0 RC1

This is the first release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.2.0-incubating. Thanks to all the community members for their contributions to this release! *** Please download, test and vote by Wednesday, June 19, 1700 hrs US Pacific. *** It fixes the following issues:

Re: Review Request 60142: GEODE-3071: Provide capability to parallelize distributedTests

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60142/#review178070 --- So much awesome. - Anthony Baker On June 16, 2017, 12:59 a.m

Re: release 1.2

eing used (which is by default but potentially unknown). >> >> >> It's small but not critical -- we thought we might get it in if the 1.2 >> release lingered. Eric was running pre-check-in on it. >> >> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Anthony Baker <ab

Re: release 1.2

> On Jun 14, 2017, at 12:03 PM, Eric Shu wrote: > > I'd like to include GEODE-2301 in the release 1.2.0 (deprecate GEODE > implementation of JTA transaction manager) > > -Eric Thanks Eric. Can you make a case for why this change needs to go into 1.2.0? We’re pretty locked

Re: release 1.2

ps://github.com/apache/geode/commit/24192d4fbc8739d0f4dae2b4de5c8fd00b82ad32> > On Jun 13, 2017, at 9:44 AM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > Vahram, > > Thanks for advocating for this issue! While the release it pretty locked > down for changes, this loo

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >