Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0.RC2

2018-04-05 Thread Anilkumar Gingade
Sounds like its suggestion to improve the process...I feel that should be discussed in different thread; not part of release voting. -Anil. On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 10:10 AM, Jared Stewart wrote: > Out of curiosity, what was Pulkit's suggestion? I don't see it in this >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0.RC2

2018-04-05 Thread Jared Stewart
Out of curiosity, what was Pulkit's suggestion? I don't see it in this thread. On Thu, Apr 5, 2018, 8:32 AM Alexander Murmann wrote: > I am very much in favor of Pulkit's suggestion. We've previously discussed > using something like >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0.RC2

2018-04-05 Thread John Blum
Thanks Anthony and team. On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:03 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: > +1 > > - checked signatures > - checked sha’s > - checked for binaries in source release > - builds from source > - examples run cleanly > > Let’s crowd source some release notes at

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0.RC2

2018-04-05 Thread Anthony Baker
+1 - checked signatures - checked sha’s - checked for binaries in source release - builds from source - examples run cleanly Let’s crowd source some release notes at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Release+Notes#ReleaseNotes-1.5.0. Anthony > On Mar 30, 2018, at 12:15 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0.RC2

2018-04-05 Thread Alexander Murmann
I am very much in favor of Pulkit's suggestion. We've previously discussed using something like https://github.com/nebula-plugins/gradle-dependency-lock-plugin. This would make a process like Pulkit describes very easy. We could easily be on the latest versions that are known to work and at the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0.RC2

2018-04-05 Thread Anthony Baker
I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-5001 for this. Anthony > On Apr 4, 2018, at 5:39 PM, John Blum wrote: > > +0 > > > The Apache Geode *Log4j* dependency version *2.8.2* is or will cause > significant issues for apps, and in particular *Spring Boot* 2.0

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0.RC2

2018-04-04 Thread John Blum
+0 The Apache Geode *Log4j* dependency version *2.8.2* is or will cause significant issues for apps, and in particular *Spring Boot* 2.0 apps. This Geode Log4j version is already quite dated as *Log4j 2.11.0* is now already available [1] and *Spring Boot* 2.0 pulls in *Log4j 2.10.0* [2]. *Why

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0.RC2

2018-04-04 Thread Bruce Schuchardt
+1 for releasing this RC On 3/30/18 12:15 PM, Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: Both issues mentioned in the RC1 vote thread have been resolved. This is the second release

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0.RC2

2018-04-04 Thread Michael Stolz
Mine was a +1 for both actually -- Mike Stolz Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Lead Mobile: +1-631-835-4771 Download the new GemFire book here. On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 4:08 PM, Jinmei Liao wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0.RC2

2018-04-04 Thread Jinmei Liao
+1 for release. On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 12:24 PM, Joey McAllister wrote: > Mike: Just for clarification, is yours a +1 for the release or a +1 to > extending the vote? > > Thanks, > Joey > > > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 12:21 PM Dan Smith wrote: > > > +1

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0.RC2

2018-04-04 Thread Joey McAllister
Mike: Just for clarification, is yours a +1 for the release or a +1 to extending the vote? Thanks, Joey On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 12:21 PM Dan Smith wrote: > +1 to an extension of time > > +1 to this release - ran geode-release-check, looks good to me. > > -Dan > > On Wed,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0.RC2

2018-04-04 Thread Dan Smith
+1 to an extension of time +1 to this release - ran geode-release-check, looks good to me. -Dan On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Michael Stolz wrote: > +1 > > -- > Mike Stolz > > On Apr 4, 2018 2:06 PM, "Joey McAllister" wrote: > > > +1 to Anthony's

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0.RC2

2018-04-04 Thread Michael Stolz
+1 -- Mike Stolz On Apr 4, 2018 2:06 PM, "Joey McAllister" wrote: > +1 to Anthony's recommendation of extending the vote by 24 hours, since > some community members might have ignored this one, thinking that the > negative vote would lead to a new release

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0.RC2

2018-04-04 Thread Joey McAllister
+1 to Anthony's recommendation of extending the vote by 24 hours, since some community members might have ignored this one, thinking that the negative vote would lead to a new release candidate/vote. On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:59 AM Anthony Baker wrote: > Bruce updated his

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0.RC2

2018-04-04 Thread Anthony Baker
Bruce updated his vote (retracting the -1) in a different thread. That leaves us with one vote cast thus far which is not sufficient. I suggest we extend the vote window an extra 24h to allow additional time to review and vote. Anthony > On Apr 2, 2018, at 3:13 PM, Bruce Schuchardt

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0.RC2

2018-04-02 Thread Bruce Schuchardt
I vote -1 in light of GEODE-4989 . This issue can cause CQ queries to be slow or even hang.  I can see that the serialization work that caused this problem is in the release/1.5.0 branch. On 3/30/18 12:15 PM, Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: Both

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0.RC2

2018-03-30 Thread Sai Boorlagadda
+1 - Verified GEODE-4913 - Verified basic gfsh functionality - Ran examples - Builds from source On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 12:15 PM, Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > Both issues mentioned in the RC1 vote thread >