Re: [DISCUSS] - Move gfsh into its own submodule
Thanks for the positive feedback. This proposal is accepted and development will proceed. --Jens On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 9:27 AM Dale Emery wrote: > +ힹ > — > Dale Emery > dem...@pivotal.io > > > > > On Nov 22, 2019, at 8:39 AM, Jens Deppe wrote: > > > > Hello All, > > > > We'd like to propose moving gfsh and all associated commands into its own > > gradle submodule (implicitly thus also producing a separate maven > > artifact). The underlying intent is to decouple geode core from any > Spring > > dependencies. > > > > The proposal is outlined here: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Move+gfsh+code+to+a+separate+gradle+sub-project > > > > Please provide feedback for this proposal *on this email thread* and not > in > > the comment section of the proposal page. > > > > The deadline for this proposal will be Monday, December 2. > > > > Thanks in advance for feedback / comments. > > > > --Jens & Patrick > >
Re: [DISCUSS] - Move gfsh into its own submodule
+ힹ — Dale Emery dem...@pivotal.io > On Nov 22, 2019, at 8:39 AM, Jens Deppe wrote: > > Hello All, > > We'd like to propose moving gfsh and all associated commands into its own > gradle submodule (implicitly thus also producing a separate maven > artifact). The underlying intent is to decouple geode core from any Spring > dependencies. > > The proposal is outlined here: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Move+gfsh+code+to+a+separate+gradle+sub-project > > Please provide feedback for this proposal *on this email thread* and not in > the comment section of the proposal page. > > The deadline for this proposal will be Monday, December 2. > > Thanks in advance for feedback / comments. > > --Jens & Patrick
Re: [DISCUSS] - Move gfsh into its own submodule
Most. Popular. Proposal. EVER! On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 3:13 PM Charlie Black wrote: > Just to see if the refactor happens by itself... > > +200 > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 3:10 PM Alexander Murmann > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > If we get to 200, the refactor implements itself, right? > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 1:57 PM Jason Huynh wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > I think we are now at +114 thanks to jinmei's 100 ;-) > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 1:50 PM Mark Bretl wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:55 PM Nabarun Nag > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:51 PM Charlie Black > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > this proposal == awesome sauce > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 11:24 AM Robert Houghton < > > > rhough...@pivotal.io > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do we want to restart from my lazy POC from a few months ago? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019, 08:40 Jens Deppe > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We'd like to propose moving gfsh and all associated commands > > into > > > > its > > > > > > own > > > > > > > > gradle submodule (implicitly thus also producing a separate > > maven > > > > > > > > artifact). The underlying intent is to decouple geode core > from > > > any > > > > > > > Spring > > > > > > > > dependencies. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The proposal is outlined here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Move+gfsh+code+to+a+separate+gradle+sub-project > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please provide feedback for this proposal *on this email > > thread* > > > > and > > > > > > not > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > the comment section of the proposal page. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The deadline for this proposal will be Monday, December 2. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance for feedback / comments. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --Jens & Patrick > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Charlie Black | cbl...@pivotal.io > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Charlie Black | cbl...@pivotal.io >
Re: [DISCUSS] - Move gfsh into its own submodule
Just to see if the refactor happens by itself... +200 On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 3:10 PM Alexander Murmann wrote: > +1 > > If we get to 200, the refactor implements itself, right? > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 1:57 PM Jason Huynh wrote: > > > +1 > > I think we are now at +114 thanks to jinmei's 100 ;-) > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 1:50 PM Mark Bretl wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:55 PM Nabarun Nag wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:51 PM Charlie Black > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > this proposal == awesome sauce > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 11:24 AM Robert Houghton < > > rhough...@pivotal.io > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Do we want to restart from my lazy POC from a few months ago? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019, 08:40 Jens Deppe > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We'd like to propose moving gfsh and all associated commands > into > > > its > > > > > own > > > > > > > gradle submodule (implicitly thus also producing a separate > maven > > > > > > > artifact). The underlying intent is to decouple geode core from > > any > > > > > > Spring > > > > > > > dependencies. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The proposal is outlined here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Move+gfsh+code+to+a+separate+gradle+sub-project > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please provide feedback for this proposal *on this email > thread* > > > and > > > > > not > > > > > > in > > > > > > > the comment section of the proposal page. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The deadline for this proposal will be Monday, December 2. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance for feedback / comments. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --Jens & Patrick > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Charlie Black | cbl...@pivotal.io > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Charlie Black | cbl...@pivotal.io
Re: [DISCUSS] - Move gfsh into its own submodule
+1 If we get to 200, the refactor implements itself, right? On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 1:57 PM Jason Huynh wrote: > +1 > I think we are now at +114 thanks to jinmei's 100 ;-) > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 1:50 PM Mark Bretl wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:55 PM Nabarun Nag wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:51 PM Charlie Black > > wrote: > > > > > > > this proposal == awesome sauce > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 11:24 AM Robert Houghton < > rhough...@pivotal.io > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > Do we want to restart from my lazy POC from a few months ago? > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019, 08:40 Jens Deppe > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > > > > > > > We'd like to propose moving gfsh and all associated commands into > > its > > > > own > > > > > > gradle submodule (implicitly thus also producing a separate maven > > > > > > artifact). The underlying intent is to decouple geode core from > any > > > > > Spring > > > > > > dependencies. > > > > > > > > > > > > The proposal is outlined here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Move+gfsh+code+to+a+separate+gradle+sub-project > > > > > > > > > > > > Please provide feedback for this proposal *on this email thread* > > and > > > > not > > > > > in > > > > > > the comment section of the proposal page. > > > > > > > > > > > > The deadline for this proposal will be Monday, December 2. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance for feedback / comments. > > > > > > > > > > > > --Jens & Patrick > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Charlie Black | cbl...@pivotal.io > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] - Move gfsh into its own submodule
+1 I think we are now at +114 thanks to jinmei's 100 ;-) On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 1:50 PM Mark Bretl wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:55 PM Nabarun Nag wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:51 PM Charlie Black > wrote: > > > > > this proposal == awesome sauce > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 11:24 AM Robert Houghton > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > Do we want to restart from my lazy POC from a few months ago? > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019, 08:40 Jens Deppe wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > > > > > We'd like to propose moving gfsh and all associated commands into > its > > > own > > > > > gradle submodule (implicitly thus also producing a separate maven > > > > > artifact). The underlying intent is to decouple geode core from any > > > > Spring > > > > > dependencies. > > > > > > > > > > The proposal is outlined here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Move+gfsh+code+to+a+separate+gradle+sub-project > > > > > > > > > > Please provide feedback for this proposal *on this email thread* > and > > > not > > > > in > > > > > the comment section of the proposal page. > > > > > > > > > > The deadline for this proposal will be Monday, December 2. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance for feedback / comments. > > > > > > > > > > --Jens & Patrick > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Charlie Black | cbl...@pivotal.io > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] - Move gfsh into its own submodule
+1 On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:55 PM Nabarun Nag wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:51 PM Charlie Black wrote: > > > this proposal == awesome sauce > > > > +1 > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 11:24 AM Robert Houghton > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Do we want to restart from my lazy POC from a few months ago? > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019, 08:40 Jens Deppe wrote: > > > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > > > We'd like to propose moving gfsh and all associated commands into its > > own > > > > gradle submodule (implicitly thus also producing a separate maven > > > > artifact). The underlying intent is to decouple geode core from any > > > Spring > > > > dependencies. > > > > > > > > The proposal is outlined here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Move+gfsh+code+to+a+separate+gradle+sub-project > > > > > > > > Please provide feedback for this proposal *on this email thread* and > > not > > > in > > > > the comment section of the proposal page. > > > > > > > > The deadline for this proposal will be Monday, December 2. > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance for feedback / comments. > > > > > > > > --Jens & Patrick > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Charlie Black | cbl...@pivotal.io > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] - Move gfsh into its own submodule
+1 On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:51 PM Charlie Black wrote: > this proposal == awesome sauce > > +1 > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 11:24 AM Robert Houghton > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Do we want to restart from my lazy POC from a few months ago? > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019, 08:40 Jens Deppe wrote: > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > We'd like to propose moving gfsh and all associated commands into its > own > > > gradle submodule (implicitly thus also producing a separate maven > > > artifact). The underlying intent is to decouple geode core from any > > Spring > > > dependencies. > > > > > > The proposal is outlined here: > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Move+gfsh+code+to+a+separate+gradle+sub-project > > > > > > Please provide feedback for this proposal *on this email thread* and > not > > in > > > the comment section of the proposal page. > > > > > > The deadline for this proposal will be Monday, December 2. > > > > > > Thanks in advance for feedback / comments. > > > > > > --Jens & Patrick > > > > > > > > -- > Charlie Black | cbl...@pivotal.io >
Re: [DISCUSS] - Move gfsh into its own submodule
this proposal == awesome sauce +1 On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 11:24 AM Robert Houghton wrote: > +1 > > Do we want to restart from my lazy POC from a few months ago? > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019, 08:40 Jens Deppe wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > > We'd like to propose moving gfsh and all associated commands into its own > > gradle submodule (implicitly thus also producing a separate maven > > artifact). The underlying intent is to decouple geode core from any > Spring > > dependencies. > > > > The proposal is outlined here: > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Move+gfsh+code+to+a+separate+gradle+sub-project > > > > Please provide feedback for this proposal *on this email thread* and not > in > > the comment section of the proposal page. > > > > The deadline for this proposal will be Monday, December 2. > > > > Thanks in advance for feedback / comments. > > > > --Jens & Patrick > > > -- Charlie Black | cbl...@pivotal.io
Re: [DISCUSS] - Move gfsh into its own submodule
+1 Do we want to restart from my lazy POC from a few months ago? On Fri, Nov 22, 2019, 08:40 Jens Deppe wrote: > Hello All, > > We'd like to propose moving gfsh and all associated commands into its own > gradle submodule (implicitly thus also producing a separate maven > artifact). The underlying intent is to decouple geode core from any Spring > dependencies. > > The proposal is outlined here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Move+gfsh+code+to+a+separate+gradle+sub-project > > Please provide feedback for this proposal *on this email thread* and not in > the comment section of the proposal page. > > The deadline for this proposal will be Monday, December 2. > > Thanks in advance for feedback / comments. > > --Jens & Patrick >
Re: [DISCUSS] - Move gfsh into its own submodule
+1 On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 8:41 AM Jens Deppe wrote: > Hello All, > > We'd like to propose moving gfsh and all associated commands into its own > gradle submodule (implicitly thus also producing a separate maven > artifact). The underlying intent is to decouple geode core from any Spring > dependencies. > > The proposal is outlined here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Move+gfsh+code+to+a+separate+gradle+sub-project > > Please provide feedback for this proposal *on this email thread* and not in > the comment section of the proposal page. > > The deadline for this proposal will be Monday, December 2. > > Thanks in advance for feedback / comments. > > --Jens & Patrick >
Re: [DISCUSS] - Move gfsh into its own submodule
+1 !! On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 9:42 AM Dan Smith wrote: > +1 > > Awesome!!! > > -Dan > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 9:33 AM Owen Nichols wrote: > > > +1 > > > > It makes total sense that gfsh should depend on core, and core should be > > completely unaware of it. The dependency untangling that results will > also > > help pave the way for other interfaces, such as a gfsh-free management > REST > > interface. > > > > > > > On Nov 22, 2019, at 8:45 AM, Jinmei Liao wrote: > > > > > > +100. Would be a great move. > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 8:40 AM Jens Deppe > wrote: > > > > > >> Hello All, > > >> > > >> We'd like to propose moving gfsh and all associated commands into its > > own > > >> gradle submodule (implicitly thus also producing a separate maven > > >> artifact). The underlying intent is to decouple geode core from any > > Spring > > >> dependencies. > > >> > > >> The proposal is outlined here: > > >> > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Move+gfsh+code+to+a+separate+gradle+sub-project > > >> > > >> Please provide feedback for this proposal *on this email thread* and > > not in > > >> the comment section of the proposal page. > > >> > > >> The deadline for this proposal will be Monday, December 2. > > >> > > >> Thanks in advance for feedback / comments. > > >> > > >> --Jens & Patrick > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Cheers > > > > > > Jinmei > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] - Move gfsh into its own submodule
+1 great idea! On 11/22/19 8:39 AM, Jens Deppe wrote: Hello All, We'd like to propose moving gfsh and all associated commands into its own gradle submodule (implicitly thus also producing a separate maven artifact). The underlying intent is to decouple geode core from any Spring dependencies. The proposal is outlined here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Move+gfsh+code+to+a+separate+gradle+sub-project Please provide feedback for this proposal *on this email thread* and not in the comment section of the proposal page. The deadline for this proposal will be Monday, December 2. Thanks in advance for feedback / comments. --Jens & Patrick
Re: [DISCUSS] - Move gfsh into its own submodule
+1 Awesome!!! -Dan On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 9:33 AM Owen Nichols wrote: > +1 > > It makes total sense that gfsh should depend on core, and core should be > completely unaware of it. The dependency untangling that results will also > help pave the way for other interfaces, such as a gfsh-free management REST > interface. > > > > On Nov 22, 2019, at 8:45 AM, Jinmei Liao wrote: > > > > +100. Would be a great move. > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 8:40 AM Jens Deppe wrote: > > > >> Hello All, > >> > >> We'd like to propose moving gfsh and all associated commands into its > own > >> gradle submodule (implicitly thus also producing a separate maven > >> artifact). The underlying intent is to decouple geode core from any > Spring > >> dependencies. > >> > >> The proposal is outlined here: > >> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Move+gfsh+code+to+a+separate+gradle+sub-project > >> > >> Please provide feedback for this proposal *on this email thread* and > not in > >> the comment section of the proposal page. > >> > >> The deadline for this proposal will be Monday, December 2. > >> > >> Thanks in advance for feedback / comments. > >> > >> --Jens & Patrick > >> > > > > > > -- > > Cheers > > > > Jinmei > >
Re: [DISCUSS] - Move gfsh into its own submodule
+1 It makes total sense that gfsh should depend on core, and core should be completely unaware of it. The dependency untangling that results will also help pave the way for other interfaces, such as a gfsh-free management REST interface. > On Nov 22, 2019, at 8:45 AM, Jinmei Liao wrote: > > +100. Would be a great move. > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 8:40 AM Jens Deppe wrote: > >> Hello All, >> >> We'd like to propose moving gfsh and all associated commands into its own >> gradle submodule (implicitly thus also producing a separate maven >> artifact). The underlying intent is to decouple geode core from any Spring >> dependencies. >> >> The proposal is outlined here: >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Move+gfsh+code+to+a+separate+gradle+sub-project >> >> Please provide feedback for this proposal *on this email thread* and not in >> the comment section of the proposal page. >> >> The deadline for this proposal will be Monday, December 2. >> >> Thanks in advance for feedback / comments. >> >> --Jens & Patrick >> > > > -- > Cheers > > Jinmei
Re: [DISCUSS] - Move gfsh into its own submodule
+1 On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 9:17 AM Kirk Lund wrote: > +1 yes! > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 9:15 AM Donal Evans wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Especially with the new management functionality on the way, this seems > > like a good idea. > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 8:45 AM Jinmei Liao wrote: > > > > > +100. Would be a great move. > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 8:40 AM Jens Deppe > wrote: > > > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > > > We'd like to propose moving gfsh and all associated commands into its > > own > > > > gradle submodule (implicitly thus also producing a separate maven > > > > artifact). The underlying intent is to decouple geode core from any > > > Spring > > > > dependencies. > > > > > > > > The proposal is outlined here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Move+gfsh+code+to+a+separate+gradle+sub-project > > > > > > > > Please provide feedback for this proposal *on this email thread* and > > not > > > in > > > > the comment section of the proposal page. > > > > > > > > The deadline for this proposal will be Monday, December 2. > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance for feedback / comments. > > > > > > > > --Jens & Patrick > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Cheers > > > > > > Jinmei > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] - Move gfsh into its own submodule
+1 yes! On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 9:15 AM Donal Evans wrote: > +1 > > Especially with the new management functionality on the way, this seems > like a good idea. > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 8:45 AM Jinmei Liao wrote: > > > +100. Would be a great move. > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 8:40 AM Jens Deppe wrote: > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > We'd like to propose moving gfsh and all associated commands into its > own > > > gradle submodule (implicitly thus also producing a separate maven > > > artifact). The underlying intent is to decouple geode core from any > > Spring > > > dependencies. > > > > > > The proposal is outlined here: > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Move+gfsh+code+to+a+separate+gradle+sub-project > > > > > > Please provide feedback for this proposal *on this email thread* and > not > > in > > > the comment section of the proposal page. > > > > > > The deadline for this proposal will be Monday, December 2. > > > > > > Thanks in advance for feedback / comments. > > > > > > --Jens & Patrick > > > > > > > > > -- > > Cheers > > > > Jinmei > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] - Move gfsh into its own submodule
+1 Especially with the new management functionality on the way, this seems like a good idea. On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 8:45 AM Jinmei Liao wrote: > +100. Would be a great move. > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 8:40 AM Jens Deppe wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > > We'd like to propose moving gfsh and all associated commands into its own > > gradle submodule (implicitly thus also producing a separate maven > > artifact). The underlying intent is to decouple geode core from any > Spring > > dependencies. > > > > The proposal is outlined here: > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Move+gfsh+code+to+a+separate+gradle+sub-project > > > > Please provide feedback for this proposal *on this email thread* and not > in > > the comment section of the proposal page. > > > > The deadline for this proposal will be Monday, December 2. > > > > Thanks in advance for feedback / comments. > > > > --Jens & Patrick > > > > > -- > Cheers > > Jinmei >
Re: [DISCUSS] - Move gfsh into its own submodule
+100. Would be a great move. On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 8:40 AM Jens Deppe wrote: > Hello All, > > We'd like to propose moving gfsh and all associated commands into its own > gradle submodule (implicitly thus also producing a separate maven > artifact). The underlying intent is to decouple geode core from any Spring > dependencies. > > The proposal is outlined here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Move+gfsh+code+to+a+separate+gradle+sub-project > > Please provide feedback for this proposal *on this email thread* and not in > the comment section of the proposal page. > > The deadline for this proposal will be Monday, December 2. > > Thanks in advance for feedback / comments. > > --Jens & Patrick > -- Cheers Jinmei
[DISCUSS] - Move gfsh into its own submodule
Hello All, We'd like to propose moving gfsh and all associated commands into its own gradle submodule (implicitly thus also producing a separate maven artifact). The underlying intent is to decouple geode core from any Spring dependencies. The proposal is outlined here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Move+gfsh+code+to+a+separate+gradle+sub-project Please provide feedback for this proposal *on this email thread* and not in the comment section of the proposal page. The deadline for this proposal will be Monday, December 2. Thanks in advance for feedback / comments. --Jens & Patrick
