Hi all,
It looks like we have consensus to go forward with this proposal. I've
moved it to the "In Development" state. Thanks all for your comments on
this and the previous RFC for this feature.
-Dan
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 10:35 AM Jason Huynh wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 7:27 AM
+1
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 7:27 AM Joris Melchior wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 6:33 PM Dan Smith wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > A new RFC is up for this feature
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Client+side+configuration+for+a+SNI+proxy
> > .
> >
> >
> >
+1
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 6:33 PM Dan Smith wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A new RFC is up for this feature
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Client+side+configuration+for+a+SNI+proxy
> .
>
>
> Please review and comment by this Friday, 3/20/2020.
>
> This hopefully addresses some of
+1
On 3/18/20, 4:13 PM, "Dan Smith" wrote:
One addendum to this proposal:
This proposed method of configuring a SNI proxy server requires that the
client sends the SNI hostname as part of the TLS handshake. In the previous
proposal we suggested it would only be sent if a
+1
> On Mar 18, 2020, at 4:13 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
>
> One addendum to this proposal:
>
> This proposed method of configuring a SNI proxy server requires that the
> client sends the SNI hostname as part of the TLS handshake. In the previous
> proposal we suggested it would only be sent if a
One addendum to this proposal:
This proposed method of configuring a SNI proxy server requires that the
client sends the SNI hostname as part of the TLS handshake. In the previous
proposal we suggested it would only be sent if a SNI Proxy is configured.
Now we propose that a geode client will
Hi all,
A new RFC is up for this feature
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Client+side+configuration+for+a+SNI+proxy.
Please review and comment by this Friday, 3/20/2020.
This hopefully addresses some of the concerns with the previous RFC for
this feature. The new proposal is
