+1
On 6/26/20, 7:51 AM, "Bruce Schuchardt" wrote:
This small fix avoids a failure of one cluster to communicate with the
locators of another cluster, ensuring that a proper handshake for WAN
communications occurs. Without the fix it’s possible that WAN connections will
not be formed
Looks good. Merge to 1.13 (if you haven't already).
-Dave
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 10:05 AM Donal Evans wrote:
> +1
>
> From: Owen Nichols
> Sent: Friday, June 26, 2020 9:59 AM
> To: dev@geode.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] merge GEO
+1
From: Owen Nichols
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2020 9:59 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] merge GEODE-8195 to support/1.13 and support/1.12
+1
On 6/26/20, 7:58 AM, "Ju@N" wrote:
+1
On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 15:51, Bruce
+1
On 6/26/20, 7:58 AM, "Ju@N" wrote:
+1
On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 15:51, Bruce Schuchardt wrote:
> This small fix avoids a failure of one cluster to communicate with the
> locators of another cluster, ensuring that a proper handshake for WAN
> communications occurs.
+1
On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 15:51, Bruce Schuchardt wrote:
> This small fix avoids a failure of one cluster to communicate with the
> locators of another cluster, ensuring that a proper handshake for WAN
> communications occurs. Without the fix it’s possible that WAN connections
> will not be
This small fix avoids a failure of one cluster to communicate with the locators
of another cluster, ensuring that a proper handshake for WAN communications
occurs. Without the fix it’s possible that WAN connections will not be formed
and updates will not be transmitted between sites.
