Re: Default branch for geode should be 'develop'

2017-12-11 Thread Jens Deppe 
Thanks - I think that should do it :) Jira submitted.

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Dave Barnes  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Nabarun Nag  wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 3:10 PM Bruce Schuchardt  >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > > On 12/11/17 1:40 PM, Jens Deppe wrote:
> > > > Currently, github has the default branch for apache/geode set to
> > > 'master'.
> > > > (which is why you need to point the relevant branch to 'develop' for
> > > every
> > > > new PR).
> > > >
> > > > Do we agree that this should be set to 'develop'?
> > > >
> > > > (I've messaged with some of the Infra folks and nothing appears to
> have
> > > > changed recently so this is a bit weird).
> > > >
> > > > I'll create a Jira once there is agreement.
> > > >
> > > > --Jens
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Default branch for geode should be 'develop'

2017-12-11 Thread Dave Barnes 
+1

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Nabarun Nag  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 3:10 PM Bruce Schuchardt 
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On 12/11/17 1:40 PM, Jens Deppe wrote:
> > > Currently, github has the default branch for apache/geode set to
> > 'master'.
> > > (which is why you need to point the relevant branch to 'develop' for
> > every
> > > new PR).
> > >
> > > Do we agree that this should be set to 'develop'?
> > >
> > > (I've messaged with some of the Infra folks and nothing appears to have
> > > changed recently so this is a bit weird).
> > >
> > > I'll create a Jira once there is agreement.
> > >
> > > --Jens
> > >
> >
> >
>

Re: Default branch for geode should be 'develop'

2017-12-11 Thread Nabarun Nag 
+1

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 3:10 PM Bruce Schuchardt 
wrote:

> +1
>
>
> On 12/11/17 1:40 PM, Jens Deppe wrote:
> > Currently, github has the default branch for apache/geode set to
> 'master'.
> > (which is why you need to point the relevant branch to 'develop' for
> every
> > new PR).
> >
> > Do we agree that this should be set to 'develop'?
> >
> > (I've messaged with some of the Infra folks and nothing appears to have
> > changed recently so this is a bit weird).
> >
> > I'll create a Jira once there is agreement.
> >
> > --Jens
> >
>
>

Re: Default branch for geode should be 'develop'

2017-12-11 Thread Bruce Schuchardt 

+1


On 12/11/17 1:40 PM, Jens Deppe wrote:

Currently, github has the default branch for apache/geode set to 'master'.
(which is why you need to point the relevant branch to 'develop' for every
new PR).

Do we agree that this should be set to 'develop'?

(I've messaged with some of the Infra folks and nothing appears to have
changed recently so this is a bit weird).

I'll create a Jira once there is agreement.

--Jens

Re: Default branch for geode should be 'develop'

2017-12-11 Thread Mark Bretl 
+1

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Dan Smith  wrote:

> +1
>
> -Dan
>
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Jens Deppe  wrote:
>
> > Currently, github has the default branch for apache/geode set to
> 'master'.
> > (which is why you need to point the relevant branch to 'develop' for
> every
> > new PR).
> >
> > Do we agree that this should be set to 'develop'?
> >
> > (I've messaged with some of the Infra folks and nothing appears to have
> > changed recently so this is a bit weird).
> >
> > I'll create a Jira once there is agreement.
> >
> > --Jens
> >
>

Re: Default branch for geode should be 'develop'

2017-12-11 Thread Dan Smith 
+1

-Dan

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Jens Deppe  wrote:

> Currently, github has the default branch for apache/geode set to 'master'.
> (which is why you need to point the relevant branch to 'develop' for every
> new PR).
>
> Do we agree that this should be set to 'develop'?
>
> (I've messaged with some of the Infra folks and nothing appears to have
> changed recently so this is a bit weird).
>
> I'll create a Jira once there is agreement.
>
> --Jens
>

Re: Default branch for geode should be 'develop'

2017-12-11 Thread Jinmei Liao 
+1

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Patrick Rhomberg 
wrote:

> +1 for smoother workflow.
>
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Darrel Schneider 
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Jens Deppe 
> wrote:
> >
> > > Currently, github has the default branch for apache/geode set to
> > 'master'.
> > > (which is why you need to point the relevant branch to 'develop' for
> > every
> > > new PR).
> > >
> > > Do we agree that this should be set to 'develop'?
> > >
> > > (I've messaged with some of the Infra folks and nothing appears to have
> > > changed recently so this is a bit weird).
> > >
> > > I'll create a Jira once there is agreement.
> > >
> > > --Jens
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Cheers

Jinmei

Re: Default branch for geode should be 'develop'

2017-12-11 Thread Patrick Rhomberg 
+1 for smoother workflow.

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Darrel Schneider 
wrote:

> +1
>
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Jens Deppe  wrote:
>
> > Currently, github has the default branch for apache/geode set to
> 'master'.
> > (which is why you need to point the relevant branch to 'develop' for
> every
> > new PR).
> >
> > Do we agree that this should be set to 'develop'?
> >
> > (I've messaged with some of the Infra folks and nothing appears to have
> > changed recently so this is a bit weird).
> >
> > I'll create a Jira once there is agreement.
> >
> > --Jens
> >
>

Re: Default branch for geode should be 'develop'

2017-12-11 Thread Darrel Schneider 
+1

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Jens Deppe  wrote:

> Currently, github has the default branch for apache/geode set to 'master'.
> (which is why you need to point the relevant branch to 'develop' for every
> new PR).
>
> Do we agree that this should be set to 'develop'?
>
> (I've messaged with some of the Infra folks and nothing appears to have
> changed recently so this is a bit weird).
>
> I'll create a Jira once there is agreement.
>
> --Jens
>

Default branch for geode should be 'develop'

2017-12-11 Thread Jens Deppe 
Currently, github has the default branch for apache/geode set to 'master'.
(which is why you need to point the relevant branch to 'develop' for every
new PR).

Do we agree that this should be set to 'develop'?

(I've messaged with some of the Infra folks and nothing appears to have
changed recently so this is a bit weird).

I'll create a Jira once there is agreement.

--Jens