I've cherry-picked the fix into release/1.9.0
On 4/17/19 1:22 PM, Lynn Hughes-Godfrey wrote:
+1 to Bruce & Anthony's suggestion to fix it. GemFire servers are meant to
be long running processes.
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:09 PM Jacob Barrett wrote:
If it Leakes on object overt the life of
+1 to Bruce & Anthony's suggestion to fix it. GemFire servers are meant to
be long running processes.
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:09 PM Jacob Barrett wrote:
> If it Leakes on object overt the life of the application, no biggy. If it
> leaks an object frequently, say every time you call get,
If it Leakes on object overt the life of the application, no biggy. If it leaks
an object frequently, say every time you call get, then fixxy.
-Jake
> On Apr 17, 2019, at 12:05 PM, Anthony Baker wrote:
>
> If a geode process leaks memory, I think that’s a critical issue.
>
> Anthony
>
>
If a geode process leaks memory, I think that’s a critical issue.
Anthony
> On Apr 17, 2019, at 11:45 AM, Udo Kohlmeyer wrote:
>
> Unless this is a critical issue I'd vote -1 for including this.
>
> The process to release 1.9 has already been started and should be closed to
> anything
This leak could cause a long running server to run out of direct-buffer
memory, especially if conserve-sockets=false.
On 4/17/19 11:45 AM, Udo Kohlmeyer wrote:
Unless this is a critical issue I'd vote -1 for including this.
The process to release 1.9 has already been started and should be
Unless this is a critical issue I'd vote -1 for including this.
The process to release 1.9 has already been started and should be closed
to anything other than critical CVE's.
--Udo
On 4/17/19 11:30, Bruce Schuchardt wrote:
I'd like to include the fix for this memory leak that Darrel found.
I'd like to include the fix for this memory leak that Darrel found.
It's new in 1.9 and the fix is pretty simple - I'm putting up a PR now.
