Re: TimeIntegrationTest is flaky

2020-08-13 Thread Kirk Lund
Thanks guys! On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 10:47 AM Raymond Ingles wrote: > Yes, we're on it. Thanks! > > On 8/12/20, 7:25 PM, "Kirk Lund" wrote: > > Since this is a new test, can we please prioritize fixing it? > > >

Re: TimeIntegrationTest is flaky

2020-08-13 Thread Raymond Ingles
Yes, we're on it. Thanks! On 8/12/20, 7:25 PM, "Kirk Lund" wrote: Since this is a new test, can we please prioritize fixing it?

Re: TimeIntegrationTest is flaky

2020-08-13 Thread Darrel Schneider
Will do. Looks like an easy fix From: Kirk Lund Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2020 4:25 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: TimeIntegrationTest is flaky Since this is a new test, can we please prioritize fixing it? https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com

TimeIntegrationTest is flaky

2020-08-12 Thread Kirk Lund
Since this is a new test, can we please prioritize fixing it? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-8379 java.lang.AssertionError: Expecting: <0L> to be greater than: <0L> at