Re: Bump language level to 1.8

2015-10-23 Thread John Blum
+1 However, just a reminder, most environments (e.g. Java EE application servers: WebSphere, WebLogic, etc) where GemFire/Geode will most likely be used (in the enterprise) are still largely based on a 1.6 runtime, especially older versions that are still predominantly in production. In

Re: Review Request 39605: GEODE-77: Coordinator shutdown does not trigger coordinator reassignment

2015-10-23 Thread Bruce Schuchardt
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39605/#review103824 --- Ship it!

Review Request 39585: Integrated Security DUnitTest

2015-10-23 Thread Tushar Khairnar
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39585/ --- Review request for geode, Anthony Baker, Kirk Lund, and Dan Smith. Repository:

Re: Bump language level to 1.8

2015-10-23 Thread Dan Smith
Yes, this would mean dropping support for 1.7. +1 from my perspective; I'd love to start using 1.8 features in geode. -Dan On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Dick Cavender wrote: > > Since this allows 1.8 only features to be used does this signal that we're > dropping 1.7

[GitHub] incubator-geode pull request: GEODE-479 - Updating build.gradle to...

2015-10-23 Thread metatype
Github user metatype commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/pull/23#issuecomment-150641759 +1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

Re: Bump language level to 1.8

2015-10-23 Thread Wes Williams
+1 *Wes Williams | Pivotal Sr. **Data Engineer* 781.606.0325 http://pivotal.io/big-data/pivotal-gemfire On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:27 PM, William Markito wrote: > Folks, > > We had some discussions around this in the past but I guess we have not yet > made the decision to

Re: Bump language level to 1.8

2015-10-23 Thread Catherine Johnson
+1 - Oracle dropped support for Java 1.7, so anyone left using it would need an extended support contract with Oracle (not cheap) to run 1.7 in any sort of production environment. > On Oct 23, 2015, at 10:10 AM, Jianxia Chen wrote: > > +1 > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:09

Re: Bump language level to 1.8

2015-10-23 Thread Bruce Schuchardt
+1 Let's move to Java 8! Le 10/23/2015 9:27 AM, William Markito a écrit : Folks, We had some discussions around this in the past but I guess we have not yet made the decision to move forward and change the language level. Just opened GEODE-479 and would like to propose to do this change

Re: Bump language level to 1.8

2015-10-23 Thread Anthony Baker
Seems reasonable to me. We’ll bump the source/target compatibility in the build.gradle file. Anthony > On Oct 23, 2015, at 9:27 AM, William Markito wrote: > > Folks, > > We had some discussions around this in the past but I guess we have not yet > made the decision to

Re: Bump language level to 1.8

2015-10-23 Thread Anthony Baker
I think you meant ‘Does this signal that we’re dropping 1.7 support with geode-1.0’? :-) Anthony > On Oct 23, 2015, at 9:48 AM, Dick Cavender wrote: > > > Since this allows 1.8 only features to be used does this signal that we're > dropping 1.7 support with 9.0? > >

[Spring CI] Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #104 was SUCCESSFUL (with 1214 tests)

2015-10-23 Thread Spring CI
--- Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #104 was successful. --- Scheduled 1218 tests in total. https://build.spring.io/browse/SGF-NAG-104/ -- This

Re: Review Request 39554: GEODE-77: failure to deserialize member IDs from old GemFire clients

2015-10-23 Thread anilkumar gingade
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39554/#review103853 --- Ship it! Ship It! - anilkumar gingade On Oct. 22, 2015, 4:01

Review Request 39610: GEODE-77: fixing a split-brain detected in integration testing

2015-10-23 Thread Bruce Schuchardt
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39610/ --- Review request for geode, anilkumar gingade, Jason Huynh, Jianxia Chen, and