+1
However, just a reminder, most environments (e.g. Java EE application
servers: WebSphere, WebLogic, etc) where GemFire/Geode will most likely be
used (in the enterprise) are still largely based on a 1.6 runtime,
especially older versions that are still predominantly in production.
In
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39605/#review103824
---
Ship it!
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39585/
---
Review request for geode, Anthony Baker, Kirk Lund, and Dan Smith.
Repository:
Yes, this would mean dropping support for 1.7.
+1 from my perspective; I'd love to start using 1.8 features in geode.
-Dan
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Dick Cavender wrote:
>
> Since this allows 1.8 only features to be used does this signal that we're
> dropping 1.7
Github user metatype commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/pull/23#issuecomment-150641759
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
+1
*Wes Williams | Pivotal Sr. **Data Engineer*
781.606.0325
http://pivotal.io/big-data/pivotal-gemfire
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:27 PM, William Markito
wrote:
> Folks,
>
> We had some discussions around this in the past but I guess we have not yet
> made the decision to
+1 - Oracle dropped support for Java 1.7, so anyone left using it would need an
extended support contract with Oracle (not cheap) to run 1.7 in any sort of
production environment.
> On Oct 23, 2015, at 10:10 AM, Jianxia Chen wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:09
+1
Let's move to Java 8!
Le 10/23/2015 9:27 AM, William Markito a écrit :
Folks,
We had some discussions around this in the past but I guess we have not yet
made the decision to move forward and change the language level.
Just opened GEODE-479 and would like to propose to do this change
Seems reasonable to me. We’ll bump the source/target compatibility in the
build.gradle file.
Anthony
> On Oct 23, 2015, at 9:27 AM, William Markito wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> We had some discussions around this in the past but I guess we have not yet
> made the decision to
I think you meant ‘Does this signal that we’re dropping 1.7 support with
geode-1.0’?
:-)
Anthony
> On Oct 23, 2015, at 9:48 AM, Dick Cavender wrote:
>
>
> Since this allows 1.8 only features to be used does this signal that we're
> dropping 1.7 support with 9.0?
>
>
---
Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #104 was successful.
---
Scheduled
1218 tests in total.
https://build.spring.io/browse/SGF-NAG-104/
--
This
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39554/#review103853
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- anilkumar gingade
On Oct. 22, 2015, 4:01
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39610/
---
Review request for geode, anilkumar gingade, Jason Huynh, Jianxia Chen, and
13 matches
Mail list logo