+1 for getting Bruc'e's backwards compatibility testing framework in!
-Dan
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Anilkumar Gingade
wrote:
> Right, to be enterprise class software product, it needs to be backward
> compatible...We also need to consider rolling upgrade of the
Right, to be enterprise class software product, it needs to be backward
compatible...We also need to consider rolling upgrade of the system
Thanks, Dan, Bruce for the write-up and frame-work...
-Anil.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 10:37 AM, William Markito Oliveira <
william.mark...@gmail.com>
+1
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar
wrote:
> +1 for maintaining backwards compatibility.
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Mark Bretl wrote:
>
> > +1 for backward compatibility with Geode releases.
> >
> > --Mark
> >
> > On Wed,
+1 for maintaining backwards compatibility.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Mark Bretl wrote:
> +1 for backward compatibility with Geode releases.
>
> --Mark
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Kenneth Howe wrote:
>
> > +1 to Dan
> > +1 to Bruce - the
+1 for backward compatibility with Geode releases.
--Mark
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Kenneth Howe wrote:
> +1 to Dan
> +1 to Bruce - the distributedTest extensions for backward compatibility
> would great
>
> > On Nov 1, 2016, at 4:11 PM, Bruce Schuchardt
+1 to Dan
+1 to Bruce - the distributedTest extensions for backward compatibility would
great
> On Nov 1, 2016, at 4:11 PM, Bruce Schuchardt wrote:
>
> +1
>
> I still have the backward-compatibility distributedTest extensions that I
> could contribute. The extension
+1
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We made a lot of changes in 1.0 that broke compatibility with old versions
> of gemfire for various reasons (package renaming, changing membership
> system). I just wanted to confirm that starting with 1.1, we're
yes +1
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We made a lot of changes in 1.0 that broke compatibility with old versions
> of gemfire for various reasons (package renaming, changing membership
> system). I just wanted to confirm that starting with 1.1,