> On June 13, 2016, 9:33 p.m., Dan Smith wrote:
> > If this is expected behavior, I think this message should be info level or
> > lower. warning still indicates that something is going wrong.
>
> Jason Huynh wrote:
> I agree, probably should be info for this.
>
> nabarun nag wrote:
>
> On June 13, 2016, 9:33 p.m., Dan Smith wrote:
> > If this is expected behavior, I think this message should be info level or
> > lower. warning still indicates that something is going wrong.
>
> Jason Huynh wrote:
> I agree, probably should be info for this.
>
> nabarun nag wrote:
>
> On June 13, 2016, 9:33 p.m., Dan Smith wrote:
> > If this is expected behavior, I think this message should be info level or
> > lower. warning still indicates that something is going wrong.
>
> Jason Huynh wrote:
> I agree, probably should be info for this.
I was wondering that the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/48661/#review137390
---
If this is expected behavior, I think this message should be info
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/48661/
---
Review request for geode, anilkumar gingade, Jason Huynh, Dan Smith, and
