Jenkins build is back to normal : Geode-nightly #568

See

Re: Review Request 49962: Removed extra fields from distributedmember while serialization/de

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/49962/#review146361 --- geode-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/interna

Re: Review Request 49962: Removed extra fields from distributedmember while serialization/de

> On Aug. 22, 2016, 3:29 p.m., Bruce Schuchardt wrote: > > geode-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/messenger/JGroupsMessenger.java, > > line 895 > > > > > > I don't think th

Re: Review Request 51227: GEODE-420: Locator SSL

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51227/ --- (Updated Aug. 22, 2016, 5:43 p.m.) Review request for geode, Bruce Schuchardt a

Review Request 51302: GEODE-1768: CI failure: ResourceManagerDUnitTest.testRemoveDuringKeySet

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51302/ --- Review request for geode. Repository: geode Description --- - Marked the

Review Request 51305: GEODE-1810: WAN locator exchange doesn't include hostname-for-clients if it is set

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51305/ --- Review request for geode and Barry Oglesby. Repository: geode Description ---

[Spring CI] Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #409 was SUCCESSFUL (with 1439 tests)

--- Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #409 was successful. --- Scheduled 1441 tests in total. https://build.spring.io/browse/SGF-NAG-409/ -- This

Re: Review Request 51302: GEODE-1768: CI failure: ResourceManagerDUnitTest.testRemoveDuringKeySet

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51302/#review146456 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Eric Shu On Aug. 22, 2016, 9:11 p.m., Sw

Re: Review Request 51305: GEODE-1810: WAN locator exchange doesn't include hostname-for-clients if it is set

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51305/#review146458 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Barry Oglesby On Aug. 22, 2016, 10:42 p.

Review Request 51308: GEODE-1811: Marking runtime dependencies as optional in the pom

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51308/ --- Review request for geode, Anthony Baker and Mark Bretl. Repository: geode Des

Re: Review Request 51308: GEODE-1811: Marking runtime dependencies as optional in the pom

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51308/#review146460 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Anthony Baker On Aug. 23, 2016, 12:13 a.

M3 vs. M2 dependencies

I was comparing our required dependencies of geode-core for the M3 vs. M2 release (Anything with compile or runtime scope in the pom and not marked optional). It looks like they are pretty similar, with the below differences. Removed in M3: geode-joptsimple Added in M3: shiro-core commons-b

Re: M3 vs. M2 dependencies

I think the findbugs-annotations dependency can be optional—we don’t need to ship this jar with the binary distribution. Anthony > On Aug 22, 2016, at 5:38 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > > I was comparing our required dependencies of geode-core for the M3 vs. M2 > release (Anything with compile or run

Re: M3 vs. M2 dependencies

I would need to do some experimenting to determine if any of these are truly optional. The dependent code doesn't currently jump through any hoops to make it optional. But this is something we could change. -Kirk On Monday, August 22, 2016, Dan Smith wrote: > I was comparing our required depend