Re: Review Request 53092: GEODE-2011 Client clears pdx registry needs synchronization

2016-10-21 Thread Hitesh Khamesra
> On Oct. 21, 2016, 10:25 p.m., Bruce Schuchardt wrote: > > is it possible to unit test this change? > > PdxClientServerDUnitTest.testNonPersistentServerRestartAutoSerializer ran > > into the problem but seems to be marked Flaky. Can you modify that test to > > always hit the problem and

Re: Review Request 53092: GEODE-2011 Client clears pdx registry needs synchronization

2016-10-21 Thread Bruce Schuchardt
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53092/#review153605 --- is it possible to unit test this change?

Re: Review Request 53092: GEODE-2011 Client clears pdx registry needs synchronization

2016-10-21 Thread Hitesh Khamesra
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53092/ --- (Updated Oct. 21, 2016, 6:52 p.m.) Review request for geode, Bruce Schuchardt,

Re: Review Request 53092: GEODE-2011 Client clears pdx registry needs synchronization

2016-10-21 Thread Darrel Schneider
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53092/#review153572 ---

Review Request 53092: GEODE-2011 Client clears pdx registry needs synchronization

2016-10-21 Thread Hitesh Khamesra
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53092/ --- Review request for geode, Bruce Schuchardt, Udo Kohlmeyer, and Dan Smith.