Re: gbean elements in geronimo-application no longer working

2004-09-26 Thread Dain Sundstrom
Should be fixed now... let me know if it is still broken for you (there are no test cases or integration tests that use this feature so I'm not confident it is all fixed). -dain -- Dain Sundstrom Chief Architect Gluecode Software 310.536.8355, ext. 26 On Sep 26, 2004, at 2:32 PM, Dain Sundstrom

Re: gbean elements in geronimo-application no longer working

2004-09-26 Thread Dain Sundstrom
Oh that gbean handling I fix that now. -dain -- Dain Sundstrom Chief Architect Gluecode Software 310.536.8355, ext. 26 On Sep 26, 2004, at 11:24 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: The changes last night now mean elements in the application VDD don't work any more - in EarConfigBuilder line 307, plan is

Re: svn commit: rev 47239 AND gbeans in geronimo-application missing

2004-09-26 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Sep 26, 2004, at 11:43 AM, David Jencks wrote: After a very quick review of some of these changes... This breaks a bunch of stuff. Can you be a bit more specific? Why isn't ApplicationInfo a subclass of Module? It is simply different. An ApplicationInfo object represents an application.xml fil

Re: svn commit: rev 47239 - in geronimo/trunk/modules: client-builder/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/client/builder connector/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/connector/deployment connector/src/test/org/apache/geronimo/connector/deployment deployment/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment deployment/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/plugin deployment/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/service deployment/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/util j2ee/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/j2ee j2ee/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/j2ee/deployment j2ee/src/test/org/apache/geronimo/j2ee/deployment jetty/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/jetty/deployment

2004-09-26 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Sep 26, 2004, at 10:41 AM, David Jencks wrote: On Sep 26, 2004, at 10:27 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: On Sep 26, 2004, at 3:55 AM, David Jencks wrote: This might be moving in a good direction overall, but one aspect totally sucks, namely that in the ModuleBuilder interface in the Module create

Re: svn commit: rev 47239 AND gbeans in geronimo-application missing

2004-09-26 Thread David Jencks
After a very quick review of some of these changes... This breaks a bunch of stuff. Why isn't ApplicationInfo a subclass of Module? I think this would be the quickest path to fixing the missing gbean handling and improve clarity. thanks david jencks On Sep 26, 2004, at 10:41 AM, David Jencks wr

gbean elements in geronimo-application no longer working

2004-09-26 Thread Jeremy Boynes
The changes last night now mean elements in the application VDD don't work any more - in EarConfigBuilder line 307, plan is a ApplicationInfo not a GerApplicationType. Can we fix this ASAP please, the regression is problematic. Jeremy

RE: RE: Specs Link not working

2004-09-26 Thread Martin Kastner
Hi Jacek, is just a trivial issue but can you please check my patch: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-291 Regards, Martin > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Jacek Laskowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. September 2004 14:39 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Bet

Re: svn commit: rev 47239 - in geronimo/trunk/modules: client-builder/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/client/builder connector/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/connector/deployment connector/src/test/org/apache/geronimo/connector/deployment deployment/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment deployment/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/plugin deployment/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/service deployment/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/util j2ee/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/j2ee j2ee/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/j2ee/deployment j2ee/src/test/org/apache/geronimo/j2ee/deployment jetty/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/jetty/deployment

2004-09-26 Thread David Jencks
On Sep 26, 2004, at 10:27 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: On Sep 26, 2004, at 3:55 AM, David Jencks wrote: This might be moving in a good direction overall, but one aspect totally sucks, namely that in the ModuleBuilder interface in the Module createModule(String name, Object planFile, JarFile modu

Re: svn commit: rev 47239 - in geronimo/trunk/modules: client-builder/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/client/builder connector/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/connector/deployment connector/src/test/org/apache/geronimo/connector/deployment deployment/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment deployment/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/plugin deployment/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/service deployment/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/util j2ee/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/j2ee j2ee/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/j2ee/deployment j2ee/src/test/org/apache/geronimo/j2ee/deployment jetty/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/jetty/deployment

2004-09-26 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Sep 26, 2004, at 3:55 AM, David Jencks wrote: This might be moving in a good direction overall, but one aspect totally sucks, namely that in the ModuleBuilder interface in the Module createModule(String name, Object planFile, JarFile moduleFile, URL specDDUrl, String targetPath) throws De

Re: svn commit: rev 47239 - in geronimo/trunk/modules: client-builder/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/client/builder connector/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/connector/deployment connector/src/test/org/apache/geronimo/connector/deployment deployment/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment deployment/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/plugin deployment/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/service deployment/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/util j2ee/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/j2ee j2ee/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/j2ee/deployment j2ee/src/test/org/apache/geronimo/j2ee/deployment jetty/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/jetty/deployment

2004-09-26 Thread David Jencks
This might be moving in a good direction overall, but one aspect totally sucks, namely that in the ModuleBuilder interface in the Module createModule(String name, Object planFile, JarFile moduleFile, URL specDDUrl, String targetPath) throws DeploymentException; method the planFile can be