Web App Security Questions

Boy, I didn't realize how little of this I really understand until I started reading the deployment plan schemas carefully. Default-Principal - I'm looking at the default-principal element in the geronimo-security schema. This is used in turn by the various

Re: Web App Security Questions

I added two more to the list. :) Thanks, Aaron DoAs-Current-Caller --- What is the meaning of the doas-current-caller attribute on the security element? I thought we always passed on the current caller's identity, but the default is false. Does this

geronimo: JSF Integration

I JSF there a proposal for integrating Java Server Faces into geronimo? Regards, Mouli ___ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com

Re: geronimo: JSF Integration

Sorry about that email. didn't read it.. :( --- mouli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I JSF there a proposal for integrating Java Server Faces into geronimo? Regards, Mouli ___ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!

JSF integration into geronomo

Folks, Is anybody working on JSF integration with geronimo? Regards, Mouli = Regards, Mouli 678.522.4041 ___ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-269) webservice deployment with ews

The following issue has been updated: Updater: Srinath Perera (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 1:33 AM Comment: fix the broken build Build the ews jar and update before apply the patch Changes: Attachment changed to patch_10_18_2004.txt

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-269) webservice deployment with ews

The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: Srinath Perera Created: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 1:35 AM Body: the patch http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/17935/patch_10_18_2004.txt fix the broken axis-geronimo build. Can somebody please check this in. Thanks

Re: [PATCH]FIX for AXIS geronimo module

forget to mention this fix all the testcases :) Thanks Srinath On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:37:32 +0600, Srinath Perera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All; the patch http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/17935/patch_10_18_2004.txt fix the broken axis-geronimo build :). Can somebody please

Re: JSF integration into geronomo

I think it should be at the web container or at servlet level, I am not really sure about that. I have seen a project at incubator.apache.org http://incubator.apache.org/projects/myfaces.html I don't know where that could fit in. Sorry though I have more questions than answers. Regards, Mouli

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-384) Make m:co and m:update quieter

Message: A new issue has been created in JIRA. - View the issue: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-384 Here is an overview of the issue: -

CAN WE PLEASE MAKE THE BLOODY BUILD WORK

To all those who have been making improvements to the build over the last month, can we please please get back to a situation where it works reliably, every time on Windows, Linux and OSX. No magic, no mystical plugin downloads, no arcane sequences to rebuild, no patches to apply, simply: *

Re: CAN WE PLEASE MAKE THE BLOODY BUILD WORK

Hear, hear. I don't think you'll get a fast online build, though, until Mavn itself is changed to download no snapshot more than once per build sequence (and ideally, not download snapshots that are going to be built locally anyway). Though it's worth noting that the

Re: CAN WE PLEASE MAKE THE BLOODY BUILD WORK

Totally agree with Arron's assessment. The major ongoing problems are m1's reactor (multiproject) dependency handling is simply not good enough, and other projects change their build. We also have problems we created, like modules missing dependencies on plugins. None of the people regularly

Re: CAN WE PLEASE MAKE THE BLOODY BUILD WORK

On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 10:43:13AM -0700, Jeremy Boynes wrote: To all those who have been making improvements to the build over the last month, can we please please get back to a situation where it works reliably, every time on Windows, Linux and OSX. No magic, no mystical plugin

Re: CAN WE PLEASE MAKE THE BLOODY BUILD WORK

On Mon, 18 Oct 2004, Dain Sundstrom wrote: Another problem you created, Jeremy, by switching all the specs to snapshots, which took about a week to shake out. By the way, that's still not shaken yet -- if you grep the activemq tree for rc2, you'll find a bunch of hits that should be

Fwd: [EWS] Replace JAXB-RI with XMLBeans

Folks, Can we please add web services schema's (http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/) to /geronimo/modules/j2ee-schema itself? Also, see below for a note that says that our j2ee_1_4.xsd is out-dated/broken. thanks, dims -- Forwarded message -- From: Jongjin Choi [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCH]FIX for AXIS geronimo module

Thanks Srinath. Checked in. -- dims On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:39:06 +0600, Srinath Perera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: forget to mention this fix all the testcases :) Thanks Srinath On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:37:32 +0600, Srinath Perera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All; the patch

Re: CAN WE PLEASE MAKE THE BLOODY BUILD WORK

What exactly are you asking for here? it wasn't clear from the subject... On Oct 18, 2004, at 1:43 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: To all those who have been making improvements to the build over the last month, can we please please get back to a situation where it works reliably, every time on

Re: SVN error

Does it happen every time, or did it just happen once? I sometimes get errors from svn that go away when I execute the command a second time. -dain -- Dain Sundstrom Chief Architect Gluecode Software 310.536.8355, ext. 26 On Oct 18, 2004, at 1:22 PM, mouli wrote: Is anybody else getting this