On Jan 26, 2005, at 5:16 PM, Sandip Ghayal wrote:
So let me jump into this and see I will try to provide
you with working Tx interop, actually it will be
non-working Tx Interop :-)
Go go go!
:)
geir
Cheers,
Sandip
--- Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sandip Ghayal wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
For
On Jan 26, 2005, at 5:26 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
I am now getting a non-expired certificate:
Error validating server certificate for 'https://svn.apache.org:443':
- The certificate is not issued by a trusted authority. Use the
fingerprint to validate the certificate
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-553?page=history ]
Sandip Ghayal updated GERONIMO-553:
---
Attachment: security_Timout_fix.patch
I have created patch for this and tested it to be working. Please find attached
file for the fix
Security
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-553?page=history ]
Sandip Ghayal updated GERONIMO-553:
---
Attachment: security_Timout_fix.patch
To reduce the test times I have reduced the timeout and sleep values in the test
New Context Timeout value =
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 04:56:35PM -0500, toby cabot wrote:
I have a problem at run-time
with Xerces inside a web app that appears to be classloader related.
I'm using Axis which uses Xerces so I added the xerces jars to my .war
file. When Xerces starts I get:
java.lang.ClassCastException
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-546?page=comments#action_58165 ]
Bruce Snyder commented on GERONIMO-546:
---
I tried to run this XSD through the Castor Source Generator and it blew up
because it couldn't find the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-553?page=comments#action_58168 ]
Alan Cabrera commented on GERONIMO-553:
---
50ms timeout scan? Yikes, that means that slower computers will be doing
nothing but scanning. Can you revert the
Cannot start Geronimo Server with J2EEDeployment plan
-
Key: GERONIMO-554
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-554
Project: Apache Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: general
Environment: Windows XP
Hi Alan,
Increasing timeout scan did not make any difference.
It is one second timeout value that is causing test to
fail.(though I do agree timeout scan of 50ms will be
hard on slow computers, which we can increase)
I do feel that timeouts should be in terms of couple
of seconds and not just 1
I have to ask - what are we doing that means we need to make the
timeouts so long? Is there some intrinsically long running operation
here or are things just inefficient?
I ask 'cos a 15 second test is going to get Alan yelled at again :-)
--
Jeremy
Sandip Ghayal wrote:
Hi Alan,
Increasing
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-550?page=history ]
David Jencks reassigned GERONIMO-550:
-
Assign To: David Jencks
Functioning of Transaction Time out was not properly handled
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-554?page=comments#action_58173 ]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-554:
---
I think that there is a different problem in your setup.
The geronimo-common jar is already on the j2ee-deployer classpath
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-550?page=comments#action_58176 ]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-550:
---
First of all, thank you for pointing out that the current transaction timeout
implementation is not thread safe: I agree.
Hi David,
I cleaned up my old geronimo directory and downloaded
the entire directory today.
So it can't be old code.
Also I found that once I put the common's jar file in
the plan then it works properly.
So for some reason common's jar is not in the
classpath when starting server with J2EE
Are you using a geronimo plan with
context-priority-classloadertrue/context-priority-classloader
for your web app?
I think it's likely that we added axis to geronimo between early jan
and now.
If this doesn't work (I think there is a reasonable chance it will
cause other
Hi Sandip,
I'm really confused about what might be happening because it's been
working for me for a long time on os x and linux without your patch,
and similar problems happened to a lot of people when the class moved
to the common package. For a very long time there weren't any
Refer to SG Below
Cheers,
Sandip
--- David Jencks (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-550?page=comments#action_58176
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-550:
---
First of all, thank you for
Hi David,
I think now I might know the reason for confusion from
my side and your side.
Guess it might not be an issue actually.
I was trying to use server.jar to load J2EEDeployment
configuration. So trying to bring up server with
J2EEDeployment. So guess the fix is not required then.
Sorry
On Jan 27, 2005, at 11:35 AM, Sandip Ghayal wrote:
Hi David,
I think now I might know the reason for confusion from
my side and your side.
Guess it might not be an issue actually.
I was trying to use server.jar to load J2EEDeployment
configuration. So trying to bring up server with
J2EEDeployment.
I have one more question/issue.
I facing issue when trying to deploy simple EJB.jar
file which has a resource reference to connector. The
issue is as this is Jar file there is no connected
embedded into this jar file. Also the connector was
not previously deployed.
So during deployment I get
On Jan 27, 2005, at 12:10 PM, Sandip Ghayal wrote:
I have one more question/issue.
I facing issue when trying to deploy simple EJB.jar
file which has a resource reference to connector. The
issue is as this is Jar file there is no connected
embedded into this jar file. Also the connector was
not
Thanks David.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 10:38:27AM -0800, David Jencks wrote:
Are you using a geronimo plan with
context-priority-classloadertrue/context-priority-classloader
for your web app?
I wasusing a value of false before, but I tried true and as you
expected it caused other problems,
On Jan 27, 2005, at 2:11 PM, Sandip Ghayal wrote:
Hi David,
Thanks for response David and sorry to bug you guys
with this issues.
No problem, maybe we'll learn something :-)
This is what I am trying to achieve.
1) Deploy EJB. (without resolving any references)
2) Deploy Resource 1.
3) Modify EJB
I agree with point 1 and 2 completely.
Thanks once again.
Cheers,
Sandip
--- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 27, 2005, at 2:11 PM, Sandip Ghayal wrote:
Hi David,
Thanks for response David and sorry to bug you
guys
with this issues.
No problem, maybe we'll learn
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-550?page=comments#action_58192 ]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-550:
---
I've applied the changes that remove the timer/interrupt and just check the
time at commit, and also I reset the thread
Write a thread-safe timer/interrupt based transaction timout implementation
---
Key: GERONIMO-555
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-555
Project: Apache Geronimo
Type: New
Optional resource refs
--
Key: GERONIMO-556
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-556
Project: Apache Geronimo
Type: New Feature
Components: deployment
Reporter: David Jencks
Assigned to: David Jencks
Right now, all
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-556?page=comments#action_58193 ]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-556:
---
thanks to Sandip Ghayal for suggesting this feature.
Optional resource refs
--
Key:
On Jan 27, 2005, at 2:34 PM, toby cabot wrote:
Thanks David.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 10:38:27AM -0800, David Jencks wrote:
Are you using a geronimo plan with
context-priority-classloadertrue/context-priority-classloader
for your web app?
I wasusing a value of false before, but I tried true and as
29 matches
Mail list logo
