On Mar 14, 2005, at 7:07 AM, Mark wrote:
Many appologies - I just haven't had the time to clean up the code on
my laptop with all my changes and then get them submitted for a commit
by somebody else. I have a few outstanding items to resolve before
submitting the code to check in. I know that
You may want to hang out on the IRC channel. Some developers may be
able to help you w/ the uber build.
Regards,
Alan
Robert Ritchy wrote:
Guess I need to understand the build a bit more. I assumed that 'svn
update' at the root would pull that down.
Doing another clean build now - following dire
Guess I need to understand the build a bit more. I assumed that 'svn
update' at the root would pull that down.
Doing another clean build now - following directions more closely this
time.
My apologies,
Robert
On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 14:33 -0500, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Have you updated OpenEJB
I think the build did break around that revision (around saturday
afternoon). But was fixed later that day. The latest revision builds for
me.
rgds
-Hari
On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 11:33, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Have you updated OpenEJB as well?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> Robert Ritchy wrote:
>
>
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Have you updated OpenEJB as well?
FWIW I had to build OpenEJB rather than download.
--
Jeremy
Have you updated OpenEJB as well?
Regards,
Alan
Robert Ritchy wrote:
I'm new to Geronimo (second build); so sorry if I'm missing something
obvious. But, I think the build was broken yesterday with revision
157260. The signature changed in o.a.g.security.ConfigurationUtil.java,
which broke Container
I'm new to Geronimo (second build); so sorry if I'm missing something
obvious. But, I think the build was broken yesterday with revision
157260. The signature changed in o.a.g.security.ConfigurationUtil.java,
which broke ContainerSecurityBuilder.
It doesn't appear that ContainerSecurityBuilder is
Many appologies - I just haven't had the time to clean up the code on my
laptop with all my changes and then get them submitted for a commit by
somebody else. I have a few outstanding items to resolve before
submitting the code to check in. I know that you have been busy working
towards CTS c
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-609?page=comments#action_60739 ]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-609:
---
ObjectInputStreamExt is exists because array classes don't seem to be
deserialized properly with the standard ObjectInputStr
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-609?page=comments#action_60738 ]
John Sisson commented on GERONIMO-609:
--
I would like to resolve this problem ASAP as it is a PITA not to have an
operational geronimo.log when one is testing :-(
It
10 matches
Mail list logo