Re: Review - svn commit: r126264

2005-03-14 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Mar 14, 2005, at 7:07 AM, Mark wrote: Many appologies - I just haven't had the time to clean up the code on my laptop with all my changes and then get them submitted for a commit by somebody else. I have a few outstanding items to resolve before submitting the code to check in. I know that

Re: Build break?

2005-03-14 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
You may want to hang out on the IRC channel. Some developers may be able to help you w/ the uber build. Regards, Alan Robert Ritchy wrote: Guess I need to understand the build a bit more. I assumed that 'svn update' at the root would pull that down. Doing another clean build now - following dire

Re: Build break?

2005-03-14 Thread Robert Ritchy
Guess I need to understand the build a bit more. I assumed that 'svn update' at the root would pull that down. Doing another clean build now - following directions more closely this time. My apologies, Robert On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 14:33 -0500, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > Have you updated OpenEJB

Re: Build break?

2005-03-14 Thread Hari Kodungallur
I think the build did break around that revision (around saturday afternoon). But was fixed later that day. The latest revision builds for me. rgds -Hari On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 11:33, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > Have you updated OpenEJB as well? > > > Regards, > Alan > > Robert Ritchy wrote: > >

Re: Build break?

2005-03-14 Thread Jeremy Boynes
Alan D. Cabrera wrote: Have you updated OpenEJB as well? FWIW I had to build OpenEJB rather than download. -- Jeremy

Re: Build break?

2005-03-14 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
Have you updated OpenEJB as well? Regards, Alan Robert Ritchy wrote: I'm new to Geronimo (second build); so sorry if I'm missing something obvious. But, I think the build was broken yesterday with revision 157260. The signature changed in o.a.g.security.ConfigurationUtil.java, which broke Container

Build break?

2005-03-14 Thread Robert Ritchy
I'm new to Geronimo (second build); so sorry if I'm missing something obvious. But, I think the build was broken yesterday with revision 157260. The signature changed in o.a.g.security.ConfigurationUtil.java, which broke ContainerSecurityBuilder. It doesn't appear that ContainerSecurityBuilder is

Re: Review - svn commit: r126264

2005-03-14 Thread Mark
Many appologies - I just haven't had the time to clean up the code on my laptop with all my changes and then get them submitted for a commit by somebody else. I have a few outstanding items to resolve before submitting the code to check in. I know that you have been busy working towards CTS c

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-609) geronimo.log can be closed whilst distributing an EAR if the application uses log4j

2005-03-14 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-609?page=comments#action_60739 ] David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-609: --- ObjectInputStreamExt is exists because array classes don't seem to be deserialized properly with the standard ObjectInputStr

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-609) geronimo.log can be closed whilst distributing an EAR if the application uses log4j

2005-03-14 Thread John Sisson (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-609?page=comments#action_60738 ] John Sisson commented on GERONIMO-609: -- I would like to resolve this problem ASAP as it is a PITA not to have an operational geronimo.log when one is testing :-( It