Re: More Tomcat Updates

2005-05-18 Thread Jacek Laskowski
anita kulshreshtha wrote: However there is a problem with DebugConsole. What is needed to handle .vm files? These are Velocity templates and should be handled by VelocityServlet. What problems are you facing with the DebugConsole? Anita Jacek

Re: More Tomcat Updates

2005-05-18 Thread anita kulshreshtha
DebugConsole starts properly and displays all the gbeans. When you click on any Gbean it gives : HTTP status 404 /index.vm . . description The requested resource (/index.vm) is not available Thanks Anita --- Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: anita kulshreshtha wrote: However there

Re: [POLL] API and Implementation serialization compatibility and upgrading

2005-05-18 Thread Hiram Chirino
Sorry if this has already been answered but with all the mail delays ... Hiram Chirino wrote: Hi David, Yes you are right. Our current activemq broker configuration is a bit simplistic. I wish it was as easy to support complex broker configuration in geronimo as it is in spring. With

RE: More Tomcat Updates

2005-05-18 Thread Jeff Genender
Hi anita, The DebugConsole seems to be working for me... I'll try a fresh checkout and see if I get that. Jeff -Original Message- From: anita kulshreshtha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 6:12 AM To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: More Tomcat Updates

Re: [POLL] API and Implementation serialization compatibility and upgrading

2005-05-18 Thread Jeremy Boynes
Hiram Chirino wrote: If this is true, it seems plausible that you could provide an activemq-to-gbean.xsl that converted the instance document into a GBean service configuration file containing multiple GBean definitions linked together with GBean references and configured with attribute

Re: API and serialization compatibility, was: Build Failure

2005-05-18 Thread David Blevins
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 03:54:54PM -0700, Jeremy Boynes wrote: David Blevins wrote: On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 03:56:18PM -0700, Jeremy Boynes wrote: And after all, one requirement Sun place on a JavaBean is that it is Serializable. They do not require that the JavaBean is serializable

Re: [POLL] API and Implementation serialization compatibility and upgrading

2005-05-18 Thread Hiram Chirino
Damn email delays. Hiram Chirino wrote: On May 18, 2005, at 9:55 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: I must be missing something as I still don't see why serialization is an issue. The attribute values would be coming from XML and so would be simple types from the VM. Right. The problem with this

Re: API and serialization compatibility, was: Build Failure

2005-05-18 Thread Jeremy Boynes
David Blevins wrote: Yes, I've read that spec as well as written a clean-house implementation of ObjectOutputStream: http://cvs.openejb.org/viewrep/openejb/openejb1/modules/core/src/java/org/openejb/util/io/ObjectOutputStream.java The problem is usually on the input side as the old version of the

Deploying a WebApplication containing a WebService

2005-05-18 Thread Mark
Hey everybody, Before I dive into the code, I was wondering if: - Geronimo will allow me to deploy a webapp that contains a webservice? - If there are any extra steps that are necessary besides the standard java -jar deployer.jar myweb.war? - Somebody has seen the following error: java -jar