[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-677?page=comments#action_12315212
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-677:
---
I'm not very clear on how sessions work, but I don't think invalidating a
session logs you out. Please let me know if I am
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-724?page=comments#action_12315213
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-724:
---
I don't know to what extent tranql track and follows foreign key constraints,
but it seems to me that an alternative
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-724?page=comments#action_12315214
]
Jeremy Boynes commented on GERONIMO-724:
TranQL does contain some logic to order insertions so that FK constraints like
this are respected. It could be we got
EJB 3.0 support
better integration with tomcat to optimize local calls
satya ranjan wrote:
It's Geronimo 1.0 M3 Installer.
That's what I thought. Well, to be honest (I can't find a better word at
the moment) it's way too old and doesn't support all of the features the
recent version does. Build Geronimo from its sources (@see
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-677?page=all ]
Ivan Dubrov updated GERONIMO-677:
-
Attachment: geronimo-application.xml
db_create.sql
Here is the deployment plan for the Geronimo and database schema used in mine
Hi,
I came across the same bug: essentially this happens when you deploy a
entity EJB with a field called Id (with getId() and setId(..)) methods:
As this is a quite common usage for entity EJB's :-) I hope a commiter
looks into it soon. Or has it been resolved already? I suppose not since
Thanks jacek.
I will try with recent build.
On 7/7/05, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
satya ranjan wrote:
It's Geronimo 1.0 M3 Installer.
That's what I thought. Well, to be honest (I can't find a better word at
the moment) it's way too old and doesn't support all of the
hi,
i am trying to deploy EARs but i get the following error. I am using
latest daily build.
java.lang.AbstractMethodError:
org.openejb.deployment.OpenEJBModuleBuilder.createModule
15:03:37,677 ERROR [Deployer] Deployment failed due to
java.lang.AbstractMethodError:
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Rather than using alt-dd's for everything, can't we have one application
plan with the openejb-jar plans nested inside?
I didn't know it's possible. Where can I read about it? Examples?
These would make life a little simpler for the user as they would not
need to tweak
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-724?page=comments#action_12315224
]
Gianny Damour commented on GERONIMO-724:
This indeed seems to be an issue with the order of the insert statements. By
default, SQL statements are sent to the DB in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* That a JAR called tomcat-jk-5.5.9.jar or tomcat-ajp-5.5.9 (based on the
Tomcat 5.5.9 tomcat-ajp.jar) be uploaded to Ibiblio. I think Jacek has
been involved in Tomcat JAR uploads to maven before.
Done. Should be on Ibiblio soon. I don't see it in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should we be invoking the deploy tool in startup scripts with the
following (taken from GERONIMO-502)?
java -Djava.security.manager
-Djava.security.policy=var/security/deployer.policy -jar bin/deployer.jar
standard switches and parameters
Why? I wonder what the
Krishnakumar B wrote:
hi,
i am trying to deploy EARs but i get the following error. I am using
latest daily build.
I've just built Geronimo and been able to deploy an EAR without that
error. I'm using latest daily build means that you built it yourself
today or that you downloaded the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-615?page=all ]
Gianny Damour reassigned GERONIMO-615:
--
Assign To: John Sisson (was: Gianny Damour)
RMIClassLoaderSpiImpl.normalizeCodebase(..) generates MalformedURLExceptions
unnecessarily
On 7/07/2005 9:07 PM, b Laskowski wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should we be invoking the deploy tool in startup scripts with the
following (taken from GERONIMO-502)?
java -Djava.security.manager
-Djava.security.policy=var/security/deployer.policy -jar
bin/deployer.jar standard
I believe a solution to the remote class loading problem is to
wrap any deployment exceptions in such a way that you don't need the
remote classes. For example, print the stack trace of a QL exception to a
String, pop that in a field of a DeploymentException, and send the
Aaron Mulder wrote:
I believe a solution to the remote class loading problem is to
wrap any deployment exceptions in such a way that you don't need the
remote classes. For example, print the stack trace of a QL exception to a
String, pop that in a field of a DeploymentException, and
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* That a JAR called tomcat-jk-5.5.9.jar or tomcat-ajp-5.5.9 (based on
the Tomcat 5.5.9 tomcat-ajp.jar) be uploaded to Ibiblio. I think
Jacek has been involved in Tomcat JAR uploads to maven before.
Done. Should be on Ibiblio soon. I don't
Arash Rajaeian wrote:
EJB 3.0 support
better integration with tomcat to optimize local calls
Could you please be more specific on optimize local calls?
Thanks,
Jeff
Hi Kresten,
On Jul 4, 2005, at 11:53 AM, Kresten Krab Thorup wrote:
== first project ==
Right now the Trifork ORB is using NIO for the server-side of IIOP,
but classic IO for the client side. The NIO part is great
because it lets us run all corba handling in a single selector
thread
Joern,
I'm happy to see such a highly motivated vendor joining the team! No
harm done.
Regards,
Alan
Joern Larsen wrote, On 7/5/2005 11:08 PM:
Dear Alan
It is true that we have mentioned four month in our announcement.
However you should see this as the fastest we can do the transition
Hiram,
Could you please make sure that the project gets worked on here at
Apache? Am a bit concerned about code getting forked out and then
becoming geronimo becoming a dependency on an external project. If
activeio folks want to come here and join forces with trifork folks,
that would be ideal
Davanum Srinivas wrote, On 7/7/2005 9:16 AM:
Hiram,
Could you please make sure that the project gets worked on here at
Apache? Am a bit concerned about code getting forked out and then
becoming geronimo becoming a dependency on an external project. If
activeio folks want to come here and join
Jeff Genender wrote, On 7/4/2005 10:05 AM:
Kresten Krab Thorup wrote:
As for where it should be placed ASF-wise, I am thinking that it
would be best to place it as part of Geronimo initially, because it
is a good thing to have a concrete project [the appserver] to drive
the
That's a possibility. I would not mind bringing the project into
apache if it will help grow the community.
But I think the first step is to see if activeio is the kind of think
that new Trifork orb is interested in.
Regards,
Hiram
On Jul 7, 2005, at 12:16 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Alan,
Yes that is why I threw that out there...I was interested in feedback
from what the community thinks.
Thanks for responding.
Jeff
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Jeff Genender wrote, On 7/4/2005 10:05 AM:
Kresten Krab Thorup wrote:
As for where it should be placed ASF-wise, I am thinking
yep. +1
On 7/7/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 7, 2005, at 1:17 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I dunno, if it's going to take 4 months for TriFork to finish
releasing the code, I'm all in favor of picking a home ASAP so it
doesn't
slip further.
I think
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
javax.ejb.NoSuchObjectLocalException
at
org.openejb.entity.EntityInstanceInterceptor.invoke(EntityInstanceInterceptor.java:128)
at
org.openejb.entity.cmp.InTxCacheInterceptor.invoke(InTxCacheInterceptor.java:82)
at
Jeff Genender wrote:
Anyone know what the status is on this?
I'd rather ask other way round. I've never heard of any, so the latter
answer (which would have been the former then) would answer both at once ;)
Are there working OpenEJB templates for Xdoclet?
No.
Jeff
Jacek
On 7/7/05, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Genender wrote:
Anyone know what the status is on this?
I'd rather ask other way round. I've never heard of any, so the latter
answer (which would have been the former then) would answer both at once ;)
Are there working OpenEJB
I'm sorry Jeff. It is a good idea to solicit ideas here.
What I was thinking was to start it off inside Geronimo. As it's
popularity grew, we could transition it to a sub-project; I don't think
sub-projects are evil. When it becomes a wildly popular project, we can
spin it out as a TLP.
Bruce Snyder wrote:
John said that he's working on this:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-dev/200506.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Whoops, I must have missed that. Thanks Bruce for the link!
Bruce
Jacek
Thanks for the pointer, Hiram. I will definitively make sure to look
into that project.
Kresten
On Jul 7, 2005, at 6:00 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hi Kresten,
On Jul 4, 2005, at 11:53 AM, Kresten Krab Thorup wrote:
== first project ==
Right now the Trifork ORB is using NIO for the
Patch to support new PK Generator syntax
Key: GERONIMO-725
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-725
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Components: OpenEJB
Reporter: Aaron Mulder
Attachments:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-725?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-725:
--
Attachment: pkgen.patch
Apply from tranql/tranql
Patch to support new PK Generator syntax
Key:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 7/6/2005 8:13 PM:
Resending this question as it was hidden in thread 'Re: Startup Scripts
discussion ( GERONIMO-693 )'
Should we be invoking the deploy tool in startup scripts with the
following (taken from GERONIMO-502)?
java -Djava.security.manager
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-725?page=all ]
Jeremy Boynes closed GERONIMO-725:
--
Resolution: Fixed
applied
Patch to support new PK Generator syntax
Key: GERONIMO-725
Okay, so based on this feedback thread,
- I'll change -noprogress to -quiet
- I'll leave -v and -vv
I think that's the best combination too. Being lazy myself, I'm
not ready for 2-3 large command line args to achieve -v. :)
Thanks,
Aaron
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Matt
How do I get progress bar *and* log level DEBUG?
geir
On Jul 7, 2005, at 7:25 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Okay, so based on this feedback thread,
- I'll change -noprogress to -quiet
- I'll leave -v and -vv
I think that's the best combination too. Being lazy myself, I'm
not ready for
Aaron Mulder wrote, On 7/7/2005 4:25 PM:
Okay, so based on this feedback thread,
- I'll change -noprogress to -quiet
- I'll leave -v and -vv
I think that's the best combination too. Being lazy myself, I'm
not ready for 2-3 large command line args to achieve -v. :)
Sounds
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
How do I get progress bar *and* log level DEBUG?
That doesn't make sense to me -- the DEBUG output would mangle the
progress bar by inserting output between every time the progress bar tries
to repaint its progress line. Besides resulting in
On Jul 7, 2005, at 7:47 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
How do I get progress bar *and* log level DEBUG?
That doesn't make sense to me -- the DEBUG output would mangle the
progress bar by inserting output between every time the progress
bar
You should try it -- it's cool. :)
The standard log configuration sends all DEBUG and higher output
to the log file. If you go with -quiet, no startup parameter, or -v,
then you're raising the threshold for messages printed to the console, but
you still get everything in the log
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 07:25:08PM -0400, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Okay, so based on this feedback thread,
- I'll change -noprogress to -quiet
- I'll leave -v and -vv
I think that's the best combination too. Being lazy myself, I'm
not ready for 2-3 large command line args to
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 07:53:47PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
You could also print the current progress bar into the log at each
update point, so people could put two and two together, so to
speak...
I'm kinda scratching my head as to why you would want a progress bar
in a log file no
So I've put in the new PK generator configuration syntax. Once
again, the openejb-jar.xml syntax has changed. The old style of declaring
a separate PK Generator GBean is still supported, but with a different
element. I'm going to update the wiki shortly.
There are some
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 12:16:19PM -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Hiram,
Could you please make sure that the project gets worked on here at
Apache? Am a bit concerned about code getting forked out and then
becoming geronimo becoming a dependency on an external project.
There's the f word
Should we upgrade our project dependencies to include
stable levels, such as -
avalon_logkit - from 2.0.dev-0 to 2.0.0
jetty - from 5.1.4rc0 to 5.1.4
wsdl4j - from PATCH-1193602 to 1.5.1
xmlbeans - from 1.0-DEV to 1.0.4
servicemix-spring - from 1.2.2-dev-2 to 1.2.2
Also,
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 10:32:03AM +0200, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
So what does the group want?
1) Separate builds
2) Jetty as the default
Both tested against TCK.
I was going for a pick one response. As in:
1) Separate builds (one jetty build and one tomcat
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, David Blevins wrote:
I was going for a pick one response. As in:
1) Separate builds (one jetty build and one tomcat build)
2) One build (both jetty and tomcat in the same build) with jetty as default.
I vote whatever's easiest -- you'll get both options both
+1 for #1. If you go for #2...we need to make it easy to
comment/uncomment, etc. IMHO, the less technically astute will not like
option #2...as they won't necessarily like to have to build an assembly.
OTOH, if there is a way to easily activate one or the other via a config
file w/o the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-724?page=comments#action_12315277
]
Ivan Dubrov commented on GERONIMO-724:
--
Yes, now it seems to work OK.
Nested transactions do not work correctly
-
Here is an idea for #2
If we pull Jetty out into its own plan...the user just needs to edit the
config.list file. The j2ee-server-jetty-plan.xml can be the default in
the config.list...with j2ee-server-tomcat-plan.xml commented out. If
the user wants to swap, they just edit the
Wont you have to change both the runtime and builder parts, thus
needing 2 edits? Also, the standalone deployer is in just one plan
how would you switch the builder in it?
I like this idea best so far, so despite these problems I hope we can
find a way to make it work.
david jencks
On
Alright, it's been a few days since this was proposed, going to move forward as
there didn't seem to be any objections.
(As a note to people who really want to get
features in before we release; good! Let's
release again very very soon!)
If you are in the middle of something, get to
Things I want to do for M4 (none of these need to hold up the branch):
- see if we can eliminate class names from PK Generator configuration
- get a release of ActiveMQ more recent than this afternoon (so our port
list will show the ActiveMQ port)
- fix the deployer to not echo your password
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-645?page=all ]
David Jencks reassigned GERONIMO-645:
-
Assign To: David Jencks
geronimo/jetty doesn't respect web.xml load-on-startup order
On Jul 7, 2005, at 9:48 PM, Adriano Orlando Campestrini wrote:
Aaron,
Hi, I have studied hard the geronimo environment. Now I've made
familiar with maven, svn and the eclipse configuration for geronimo. I
could note that the project is too big. And in this cases its better
to ignore details
59 matches
Mail list logo
