In GERONIMO-745 Move from Axis 1.3-SNAPSHOT to formal version, Dims said
Have we decided on a date for M4 yet? i'd want to explore releasing Axis
1.3 final prior to M4 if possible.
Are we close enough to be able to set a cutoff date for changes to the M4
QA branch, so we can answer his
Yep...all works now. Oh well...looks like the eBay deal for my
Powerbook won't be happening after all. ;-)
Thanks,
Jeff
David Jencks wrote:
I missed adding a new file. should be fixed now.
thanks
david jencks
On Jul 20, 2005, at 10:11 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
All the same since day
On Jul 20, 2005, at 7:09 PM, Lyndon Samson wrote:
Just another wacky idea but...
Webdav clients are becomming more common.
Webdav is being used for admin like tasks (
http://metzner.org/projects/xincon/ ).
I wonder if you could wrap webdav around Management GBeans/JMX/? and
give access to
yep - I'll take another run at it this morning. Scary things were
happening yesterday, and I figured they were infra related.
geir
On Jul 20, 2005, at 11:26 PM, David Jencks wrote:
The security feature doesn't seem to be working yet (or else I
can't find it on the page). Can you let us
Should the comment below be removed from the file? If not, can someone
explain where Jetty is involved here.
Should we be able to run M4 with tomcat without any jetty use at all?
!-- HTTP/SOAP Protocol is now run through jetty--
Thanks,
John
I would think it should be removed or at least moved to he appropriate
config file if need be.
Jeff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should the comment below be removed from the file? If not, can someone
explain where Jetty is involved here.
Should we be able to run M4 with tomcat without any
yes, remove it. that's very historical :-)
At one time there was a primitive soap listener in openejb. Then there
was a special port for ws on jetty. now ws runs through the normal web
port, either jetty or tomcat.
david jencks
On Jul 20, 2005, at 11:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-771?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-771:
-
Fix Version: 1.0-M5
Resolution: Fixed
changed to 2.1_2, build works.
Move from custom cglib build version HEAD-06-06-05 to
Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 7/20/05, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Genender wrote:
Ok...fair enough...then how far out would M5 be (estimates)? IMHO,
waiting for the time between M3-M4 cannot be between M4- M5. If it is
going to be that long, then +1000 to get it in now. If its a
We experimented with this with WLS, it worked pretty well. The nice thing
about webdav is that you can mount it as a file system from windows and
OSX. We also tried a similar experiment with ftp which also worked pretty
well. However, you generally want to script admin commands and there are a
Dain, Alan, Hiram, Aaron,
The web site says The GBean architecture a minimalistic kernel and
server framework for enterprise software.
- What is gbean.org?
- Is it related to geronimo?
- Is it a fork of geronimo code?
- Who should use gbean in geronimo?
- Is the gbean in geronimo dead and
Good questions.
--- Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dain, Alan, Hiram, Aaron,
The web site says The GBean architecture a
minimalistic kernel and
server framework for enterprise software.
- What is gbean.org?
- Is it related to geronimo?
- Is it a fork of geronimo code?
-
My 2c...
On the issue of releases there are several different types of folks that are
interested in using Geronimo. Off the top of my head they are:
Techies that want an implementation to play around with and are very
comfortable with an unstable, constantly evolving codebase. (Unstable is
Hi Jules
It sounds like you've been working hard!
I think you might find you run into reliability issues with a singleton
coordinator. This is one of those well known Hard Problems and for session
replication its not really necessary. In essence the coordinator is a
single point of failure
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-769?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-769:
-
Fix Version: 1.0-M4
1.0-M5
Resolution: Fixed
fixed in m4
Sending
Hi all,
I noticed that the latest binary distribution of
geronimo (1.0-169186) contains the following 2 xfire
jar files:
xfire-20050202.jar
xfire-java-20050202.jar
Do we really need them at runtime? Any info is
appreciated.
thanks, Lin
__
Do
no, their use has been removed from head. In the interests of greater
stability the files that depend on them, although not actually used,
will not be removed from m4.
We do hope to eventually create a working xfire ws implementation, but
I hope we would do that as separate geronimo modules
David,
Thanks so much for your answer. Correct me if I
understand incorrectly So we will need the two jar
files to build the files you mentioned below, but we
don't need the two jar files at runtime.
Lin
--- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no, their use has been removed from
I think that is the case for the rev you mention, and I'm fairly sure
of it for the current m4 branch. Best way is to try it to find out
:-). I'm 99% sure you will run into no problems as long as you don't
use web services, and 90% sure even if you do use web services.
thanks
david jencks
Does this process still apply for Pluto 1.0.1-rc3?
It looks like they are now producing 3 JAR files.
If we are spending time integrating the web console
into the sandbox, shouldn't we at least be using the
latest Pluto version and use their file names as
provided?
-Donald
--- Dave Colasurdo
builder tests are ridiculously overcomplicated
--
Key: GERONIMO-789
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-789
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Components: deployment
Versions: 1.0-M4, 1.0-M5
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-788?page=all ]
pat heard updated GERONIMO-788:
---
Attachment: reflection.zip
Template for the console.
Improved look feel for web console
Key: GERONIMO-788
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-788?page=comments#action_12316419
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-788:
---
Thanks! (I had asked Pat whether he'd be willing to donate his template under
the ASL since it was the best free one I
Not being the one who created GBean.org I can speak for what it is but I'll
throw in my 2c about what I think it could be.
One of the areas that seems to confuse people I've talked to is that
Geronimo is really two things. One the one hand it is a runtime framework
that is independent of J2EE.
Dain, David J, and I talked about management options on IRC. I
put a writeup on the Wiki (top of the page, with the original proposal
below):
http://wiki.apache.org/geronimo/Geronimo_Management_API
I also have an IRC log if anyone cares, but I think the writeup is
more
Where in maven would this appear? I wonder if we should create a
geronimo-dependencies virtual project or something, as opposed to
putting something like this side by side with the proper geronimo
artifacts. What do others think?
geronimo/jars (our output)
geronimo/wars (our demo
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-156?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-156:
---
Fix Version: 1.0-M3
Resolution: Won't Fix
This web console seems to be defunct; current efforts are on donated web console
DEV-02 Release
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-782?page=comments#action_12316425
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-782:
---
Step 3 use a template gbean for the WSContainer link. The web service builder
fills in part, the ebj builder fills in part.
On Jul 21, 2005, at 7:00 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Where in maven would this appear? I wonder if we should create a
geronimo-dependencies virtual project or something, as opposed to
putting something like this side by side with the proper geronimo
artifacts. What do others think?
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
geronimo/jars (our output)
geronimo/wars (our demo apps)
geronimo-spec/jars (our spec output)
geronimo-dependencies/jars/(put pluto thing here)
I think that this is confusing, because things like openejb, mx4j,
tomcat... are
JettyModuleBuilder should use references to templates, not their names
--
Key: GERONIMO-790
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-790
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Components:
Remove GBeanInstance support for J2EEManagedObject methods
--
Key: GERONIMO-791
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-791
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: kernel
Versions: 1.0-M3
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-791?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-791:
--
Description:
The current GBean Framework provides support for the methods of
J2EEManagedObject, meaning they're effectively implemented for every GBean
On Jul 21, 2005, at 7:19 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
geronimo/jars (our output)
geronimo/wars (our demo apps)
geronimo-spec/jars (our spec output)
geronimo-dependencies/jars/(put pluto thing here)
I think that this is confusing, because
On Jul 21, 2005, at 8:44 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I'm a bit dismayed about the previous posts about assuming a
release will
suck. If thats your view then it will suck and one has to ask
what is the
relvance of the project? I think the goals in the past has been to
get to
J2EE 1.4
Hi,
When I run
$ maven m:build -Dmaven.test.skip=true -Dmaven.itest.skip=true
and got some errors and build failed in the end.
see screen shot:
Please let me how to fix them.
Thanks,
Joe Qiao
I am having a bit of a hard time with some webservices in Tomcat
deployment. This appears to be an issue with servlet end points only
as EJBs seem to deploy fine.
The issue seems to occur when the TomcatWebContext is being deployed.
The error occurs on lone 78 in the GeronimoStandardContext
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-792?page=all ]
John Sisson resolved GERONIMO-792:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in rev 220241 in M4 branch. Fix in head not required as the toolsjarhack
has been removed.
Typo in ToolsJarHack message
38 matches
Mail list logo
