Re: [VOTE] sponsor ActiveMQ ServiceMix to become sub-projects of Geronimo

2005-11-19 Thread John Sisson
+1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have overwhelmingly voted to become Geronimo sub-projects. The incubator proposals are here... http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ServiceMixProposal Please vote if

Re: Remote Deployment from the Web Console

2005-11-19 Thread John Sisson
Joe, I think we still should aim to support remote deployment using the command line tools as users will expect them to work with remote systems, e.g. a user developing on Windows who wants to deploy to their UNIX box (possibly automated as part of their build process). John Joe Bohn

Re: NEW - [VOTE] sponsor WADI to become sub-projects of Geronimo

2005-11-19 Thread Jan Bartel
Gmane doesn't want to forward my email, so here's my fourth attempt at voting: +1 Jan Jeff Genender wrote: The current PMCs of WADI have overwhelmingly voted to become a Geronimo sub-project. The incubator proposal is here... http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WadiProposal Please vote if

Re: [VOTE] sponsor ActiveMQ ServiceMix to become sub-projects of Geronimo

2005-11-19 Thread Jan Bartel
2 attempts via gmane to email this have failed, so hopefully this one will succeed: +1 Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have overwhelmingly voted to become Geronimo sub-projects. The incubator proposals are here...

Re: Constructing deployment plans from Configuration GBeanData

2005-11-19 Thread John Sisson
You could look at how ant does it. I am guessing using exec(). http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/chmod.html John Aaron Mulder wrote: On 11/18/05, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In 1.1+ we could change the config store to set the file permissions on the directories it

Re: Loose end #1 -- tomcat configuration files

2005-11-19 Thread John Sisson
JIRA issue Review location of config-store directory - http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-739 should be considered when looking at support for multiple instances. John Jeff Genender wrote: +100 on this idea...we need to support multiple instances. This is going to be key on

Re: Create a security committee?

2005-11-19 Thread Dain Sundstrom
I'd like to at least observe this, and participate where I can. I suggest we exclude vulnerability reports from this so more people can participate. -dain On Nov 18, 2005, at 8:19 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote: All, I'd really like to have a group of interested and available people to review

Re: Constructing deployment plans from Configuration GBeanData

2005-11-19 Thread Dain Sundstrom
How about we do what apple does... When connecting to a protected wifi node, it won't show you the password unless you ask it to. This prevents shoulder surfing but if you know your location is safe, you can actually see what you typed. Also the key chain manager built into the os

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-1204) Jetty Stack Dump

2005-11-19 Thread Aaron Mulder (JIRA)
Jetty Stack Dump Key: GERONIMO-1204 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1204 Project: Geronimo Type: Bug Components: web Versions: 1.0-M5 Reporter: Aaron Mulder Fix For: 1.0 Not sure what happened -- I was