Hey Jason,
Well if you want to take stab at it, the code that needs to get
modified is in the o.a.activemq.network package. The
DiscoveryNetworkConnector creates new DemandForwardingBridge to
connect the local broker to a remotebroker. Notice that the
DemandForwardingBridge's constructor takes
Some last minute NOTICE issues were still present in the 5th release
candidate of the
4.0.2 build. We have also received confirmation from Apache legal
discuss that it's ok to include work covered by the Creative Commons
Attribution license. I have cut and RC 6 of the 4.0.2 build with the
fixes
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-618?page=comments#action_37310 ]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-618:
Fixed
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=469018
create a file based servicemix-file service engine with nice
Just for the record, I like having a post-processed module format.
I wouldn't mind if it had XML data instead of serialized objects, but
I am not really in favor of throwing it away and making a standard
(pre-processed) J2EE JAR+DD+deployment plan into our official module
format. So I'd rather
Hey guys, I've got all the unit tests running with make check and would now
like to run the integ tests against the 4.0.2 broker. This way we can draw
a line in the sand that says the activemq-cpp client works against all
brokers = 4.0.2. How do I run the integration tests with the new automake
Hi Nathan,
build with:
make check
that will run the unit tests and build but not run the integration
tests. You should see the integration tests.
On 10/29/06, Nathan Mittler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys, I've got all the unit tests running with make check and would now
like to run the
OK - got it! I found it in the src/test-integration folder. FYI,
everything seems to work just fine against the 4.0.2 broker!
On 10/29/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Nathan,
build with:
make check
that will run the unit tests and build but not run the integration
tests.
Does anyone else have an opinion on this? I'd like to some more feedback
(and direction)? Should I nix the issues against openwire-cpp (e.g. mark
them as resolved - not going to implement)?
On 10/28/06, Timothy Bish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd be fine with that. I don't think the
Unable to start the server using the startup scripts
Key: GERONIMO-2532
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2532
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level:
On Oct 29, 2006, at 5:11 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Just for the record, I like having a post-processed module format.
I wouldn't mind if it had XML data instead of serialized objects, but
I am not really in favor of throwing it away and making a standard
(pre-processed) J2EE JAR+DD+deployment plan
On 10/29/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps we should also take a poll from our users... and see if they
like having config compiled up into objects and zipped up and tossed
in the repo... or if they would like a set of plain XML files? I
wonder which they will choose...
It's
While waiting for bi-directional network connections... is there
anything I can do do get this working? So that the master broker
does not need to have explicit knowledge of all slave brokers? I can
open a port on the slaves... though I don't like that, but as a short-
term fix until
re-sending with Java EE schema URL links included:
[1] http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/javaee_5.xsd
[2] http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/j2ee_1_4.xsd
Original Message
Subject: Java EE schema license question
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 12:31:05 +0800
From: Bozhong Lin [EMAIL
Hi,
Apache CXF currently use java EE 5 [1] schema, and would like to include
the schema in distribution if that is allowed from copyright
perspective. From the copyright statement included in the schema file,
it seems to be very strict for redistribution. I found that Geronimo
source
Receiving a BytesMessage sent from Java using CMS listener causes exception
thrown in class BufferedInputStream
Key: AMQ-1012
URL:
+1
On 10/30/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some last minute NOTICE issues were still present in the 5th release
candidate of the
4.0.2 build. We have also received confirmation from Apache legal
discuss that it's ok to include work covered by the Creative Commons
Attribution
XBean 2.7 has been released and is available on public mirrors.
I guess G should either upgrade to 2.7 or eventually to 2.8-SNAPSHOT
if needed.
On 10/29/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you upgrade G to depend on a release or new stuff thats fine with
me... but right now G depends
17 matches
Mail list logo
