But I hope we will have this logging tool in 3.1. Is it possible? I do
my best to finish the work on it today.
Cheers,
Thomas
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I think it's time to start the release process for 3.1.
I have been working on the distribution a bit, but
it needs more work to check that the
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37905
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-761:
This was more related to the servicemix-script component which allows to
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-801.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
Thanks !
I have checked the modification in, but
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37907
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-816:
I'm not sure if the commons-logging / log4j jars should be included or removed
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37908
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-816:
Sorry, the patch is excludes/, i thought it was dependency/
useless include
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-816.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
Patch committed, thx !
useless include log
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37910
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-811:
Does Tibco really cares about the content of the SoapAction property,
or does
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grégoire A. reopened SM-816:
Regression: [Regression]
i really don't know what's happen with my patch
but it seems forgot exclusion
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-816.
Resolution: Fixed
My bad ;-) I should have applied the patch correctly and compiled.
This is now
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grégoire A. updated SM-816:
---
Attachment: pom.diff.2
useless include log framwork into jboss deployer
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37913
]
Christian Schneider commented on SM-811:
Tibco requires this field to be set. The message is rejected if there
Just synchronised with HEAD and ran the build, but it is failing at
ServiceMix :: Samples :: WSDL first :: SA
[INFO] Determining component name for service unit wsdl-first-jsr181-su
[INFO]
[ERROR] FATAL ERROR
[INFO]
Maybe retry with a clean before ?
mvn -o clean
rm -Rf ~/.m2/repo/org/apache/servicemix
mvn -Dmaven.test.skip=true
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:02 + (GMT Standard Time), Terry Cox
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just synchronised with HEAD and ran the build, but it is failing at
ServiceMix ::
Hello,
attached the patch for the new logging service. Please have a look at it
if it is ok this way (if it is please let me know I will raise a JIRA
issue then and will attach the patch). If there are any improvements on
it I will change that.
Cheers,
Thomas
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Forwarding
Yeah, good point.
As was only worried to use a relative URL ...
Let mw try it first.
Could you raise a JIRA and attach the patch please ?
On 1/12/07, Thomas TERMIN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Yeah, looks good. I will try it now.
What about using a spring Resource instead
There is usually only one instance which process all the messages
concurrently, so if you process them in a synchronized method,
only one message will be processed at one time. This does not
really ensure ordering however.
On 1/12/07, Anthony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
I wrote a
log4j service for changing log levels at runtime
-
Key: SM-817
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-817
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: New Feature
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37917
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-811:
Could you rework the patch to include the needed code in
Hi Rakesh,
Looks like this is a fantastic idea. It will eliminate most of the user
problems and hope this feature will be pretty soon in G console.
Thanks,
Lasantha
Rakesh Midha wrote:
Hello
First of all I am sorry for being missing from the list for last few
days, actually I have been
On Jan 11, 2007, at 7:27 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
What are the specifics around claiming certification? My
understanding is that to claim an assembly as certified that
specific configuration is tested and made available. Apart from
that we can ship any permutation but cannot claim those
On Jan 11, 2007, at 9:48 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
I don't think there is any requirement of exact combination of
components for TCK compliance. AFAIK, we need to ship the exact code
we tested, that's it. FWIW, it's self-certification as well :) So i am
happy if all the components are put
I think that we still need this. I didn't mind the move to JDK15
because users could always use retroweaver for earlier JDKs. We
still need this version of the spec for just such an occasion.
In any case, the retirement of the a previously supported spec needs
a little more time on the
activemq-rar-4.1.0-incubator.rar contains spring twice: spring-1.2.4.jar and
spring-2.0.jar
---
Key: AMQ-1124
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1124
Done
Hiram Chirino wrote:
Could you attach your patch to that issue and make sue your click the
Grant license to ASF for inclusion in ASF works (as per the Apache
Software License ) option.
Thanks.
On 1/11/07, rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure. It's the same as AMQ-866.
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
steve cook updated AMQ-866:
---
Attachment: double_patch.rtf
Problem from open wire dotnet send float properties message to java
Alan,
There are 2 things here:
1. Making sure our code works in all combinations
2. Passing the TCK.
Both are mutually exclusive. We are talking about #2 here :) We can
run all combinations to everyone's heart's content. But that is not
needed to pass the TCK.
-- dims
On 1/12/07, Alan D.
Triggering checkpoint when persistent queue is full
---
Key: AMQ-1125
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1125
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Improvement
Components:
Forgot to foward to dev ...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Jan 12, 2007 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: log4j
To: Thomas TERMIN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yeah, looks good. I will try it now.
What about using a spring Resource instead of a String ?
I think it
I understood the point but since every permutation takes at least two
days, hardware, and time to nurture I was more concerned about
getting in a situation where we wouldn't release anything until we
had 8 different assemblies.
On Jan 12, 2007, at 3:22 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jan
On Jan 12, 2007, at 3:31 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I think that we still need this. I didn't mind the move to JDK15
because users could always use retroweaver for earlier JDKs. We
still need this version of the spec for just such an occasion.
Interesting. I certainly hadn't been
Crash when getting string property that doesn't exist
-
Key: AMQCPP-43
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-43
Project: ActiveMQ C++ Client
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12464205
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2723:
--
These two patches:
.. Update naming-builder and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12464209
]
Rakesh Midha commented on GERONIMO-2676:
Hello KK
I tried to reproduce this problem with quite a number
Hello
I was just wondering if there is any specific reason for using sequence
elements in all our XSD schema's instead of choice elements.
In most of the mapped J2EE schema's choice is used. Because we are using
sequence the order of elements is fixed, and if child elements are not in
order we
On Jan 12, 2007, at 12:32 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Do you (or anyone else) know why we have a geronimo-transaction
and geronimo-transaction-jta11 module?
Why do we need 2 modules for this?
We don't anymore, but we did/do for 1.2.x as we can't certify on
J2EE 1.4 with the jta 1.1 library
This is done, we are using 1.0.1 in trunk now.
--jason
On Jan 12, 2007, at 12:07 AM, David Jencks wrote:
we definitely want stax-api 1.0.1, it fixes big bugs.
It used to be that the xmlbeans 2.0 pom included the unavailable
jsr-173-api jar which required the exclusion. However the
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-43?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_37914
]
Timothy Bish commented on AMQCPP-43:
Not sure that patch is what we want to do, the function it modifies is
David,
If you can show the reason list, that would be helpful. Generally
having a mail server on a blacklist will make it high enough to cause
problems. The reason list should show the culprit.
Jeff
David Jencks wrote:
What appears to be the apache spam filter is rejecting a significant
It seems there is some confusion about the difference between a
Geronimo plugin and a view that plugs in to the admin console. This
is probably due to the fact that we haven't really established the
terminology and best practices behind these new concepts yet. To
further complicate the issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-43?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Bish reassigned AMQCPP-43:
--
Assignee: Timothy Bish (was: Nathan Mittler)
Crash when getting string property that
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-43?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Bish resolved AMQCPP-43.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in Trunk, updated StompCommands getStringProperty to call getProperty
Enable axis2-deployer in jetty and tomcat jee5 assemblies
-
Key: GERONIMO-2727
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2727
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: New Feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2727?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-2727:
--
Attachment: G2727.patch
Enable axis2-deployer in jetty and tomcat jee5 assemblies
If we do start shipping 8 (or more) different assemblies... which I
think is crazy, then we probably don't want to hook them all up to
the default build, as it will just cause it take longer and longer to
run.
We really need to get plugins functional so that we can build one
assembly.
I think that if users need to retrotranslate/weave they can add that
jar, but since the default users will be required to use java 5, then
the default assembly should not include bits it does not need.
The edge cases may need to make a few changes to the assembly to get
it to work, but it
Hi Dims,
Thanks for committing the G2724 patch. I've figured out why the server
throws an exception during the start of configs\axis2-deployer and submitted
another patch (G2727).
My next step is to figure out how to fill out the necessary todos in the few
java files to get the cxfpojows
On Jan 12, 2007, at 8:53 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jan 12, 2007, at 3:31 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I think that we still need this. I didn't mind the move to JDK15
because users could always use retroweaver for earlier JDKs. We
still need this version of the spec for just such an
Java 5 SE runtime is a prerequisite for servlet 2.5 containers and
hence for jee 5 and G 2.0. The users can not expect to run jee 5 on
java 1.4. Please see an earlier discussion -
http://www.nabble.com/Make-trunk-1.5-only%21-p7561513.html
Thanks
Anita
--- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12464234
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-2723:
Anita,
This is great. However, the patch didn't apply cleanly.
Paul McMahan wrote:
OK now that I'm looking deeper into this things are becoming clearer.
First of all, as you pointed out the directory module is already
included in the jee5 assembly, which I wasn't aware of. Apparently
the commit that was supposed to have removed it from the dist only
On 1/12/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we do start shipping 8 (or more) different assemblies... which I think is
crazy, then we probably don't want to hook them all up to the default build,
as it will just cause it take longer and longer to run.
We really need to get plugins
On 1/12/07, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul McMahan wrote:
OK now that I'm looking deeper into this things are becoming clearer.
First of all, as you pointed out the directory module is already
included in the jee5 assembly, which I wasn't aware of. Apparently
the commit that
--- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm tempted
to say we should just use both schema jars and leave connector
unchanged.
I think we should have a single jar containing
o.a.g.xbeans.javaee.*
o.a.g.xbeans.j2ee.connector stuff and
o.a.g.xbeans.j2ee.jaxrpc stuff
Thanks
Anita
Thanks!. Applied the patch. I will be offline for a few days
(travelling). Hopefully Jarek/DJencks can help you apply more patches.
-- dims
On 1/12/07, Lin Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dims,
Thanks for committing the G2724 patch. I've figured out why the server
throws an exception during
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2727?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davanum Srinivas closed GERONIMO-2727.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Checked into SVN (r49566).
thanks,
dims
Enable axis2-deployer
Paul McMahan wrote:
On 1/12/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we do start shipping 8 (or more) different assemblies... which I
think is
crazy, then we probably don't want to hook them all up to the default
build,
as it will just cause it take longer and longer to run.
We really
Exception while removing directory module from the console
--
Key: GERONIMO-2728
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2728
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hernan Cunico updated GERONIMO-2728:
Attachment: log.txt
Exception while removing directory module from the console
On Jan 12, 2007, at 6:47 AM, Rakesh Midha wrote:
Hello
I was just wondering if there is any specific reason for using
sequence elements in all our XSD schema's instead of choice
elements.
In most of the mapped J2EE schema's choice is used. Because we are
using sequence the order of
How easy is it to install a set of plugins from the command-line?
And don't plugins require a remote repository to hold the archives?
While I think that this is good to allow installation of custom
plugins, I don't think its good to use a remote repo to install
system components. I'd
On Jan 12, 2007, at 6:55 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On Jan 12, 2007, at 12:32 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Do you (or anyone else) know why we have a geronimo-transaction
and geronimo-transaction-jta11 module?
Why do we need 2 modules for this?
We don't anymore, but we did/do for 1.2.x as we
Paul McMahan wrote:
On 1/12/07, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul McMahan wrote:
OK now that I'm looking deeper into this things are becoming clearer.
First of all, as you pointed out the directory module is already
included in the jee5 assembly, which I wasn't aware of.
The Resource Adapter ignores the JMSXGroupID when dispatching to MDBs
-
Key: AMQ-1126
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1126
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type:
On Jan 12, 2007, at 1:44 PM, David Jencks wrote:
We don't anymore, but we did/do for 1.2.x as we can't certify on
J2EE 1.4 with the jta 1.1 library in the path.
Okay, I think we should merge geronimo-transaction-jta11 into
geronimo-transaction-jta for server/trunk then.
OK
The original
On Jan 12, 2007, at 10:43 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
How easy is it to install a set of plugins from the command-line?
And don't plugins require a remote repository to hold the
archives? While I think that this is good to allow installation of
custom plugins, I don't think its good to use a
Hi,
I have an urgent requirement in which i have to send Map as a message to
Queue
I am trying this code:
if(message instanceof Map){
MapMessage requestMessage = (MapMessage) session.createMapMessage();
requestMessage.setObjectProperty(MAP, message);
On Jan 8, 2007, at 2:06 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: prasad
Date: Mon Jan 8 11:06:34 2007
New Revision: 494156
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=494156
Log:
= adding tests for multiple (*) filtering. Thanx Krish and Anitha
= tests fail. Geronimo-2664 opened.
snip
Hi David, what is this ASM acronym that you refer to below ??
David Blevins wrote:
On Dec 13, 2006, at 1:53 AM, Greg Wilkins wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
I took a quick look at Jetty and Tomcat source. Tomcat has some
complete looking code for injection via JNDI, except it seems it only
Are you using ActiveMQ 4.1.0 ???
On 1/12/07, garima015 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have an urgent requirement in which i have to send Map as a message to
Queue
I am trying this code:
if(message instanceof Map){
MapMessage requestMessage = (MapMessage) session.createMapMessage();
Hi,
I'm using amazon activemq client. Under debugger crash can be 100%
reproduced:
Just run it under gdb, making breakpoints in sem_post()/sem_wait() and run a
producer for this consumer then.
$ gdb ./brokersession_example_receiver_sync
GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.3.0.0-1.132.EL4rh)
Copyright
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12464318
]
Dario Andrade commented on GERONIMO-2699:
-
I've tried to separate a testcase in order to reproduce the
On 1/12/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How easy is it to install a set of plugins from the command-line?
The CLI provided by bin/deploy.sh provides an interactive shell for
this. To list and install plugins from the Geronimo 2.0 plugin
repository type :
deploy.sh search-plugins
You can install a plugin from the command line deploy tool -- just use
the install-plugin command point it to the CAR file. The down side
is that if that plugin has dependencies, they will be resolved against
a remote repository (as listed in the plugin metadata). So you'd
presently have to
we are using 4.0.2
any solution?? i want to send hashmap
Hiram Chirino wrote:
Are you using ActiveMQ 4.1.0 ???
On 1/12/07, garima015 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have an urgent requirement in which i have to send Map as a message to
Queue
I am trying this code:
if(message
Try using 4.1.0 I think it supports sending hashmaps of primitive data.
On 1/12/07, garima015 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we are using 4.0.2
any solution?? i want to send hashmap
Hiram Chirino wrote:
Are you using ActiveMQ 4.1.0 ???
On 1/12/07, garima015 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I
But if that is not an option you could always send the hash map using
an ObjectMessage.
On 1/12/07, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try using 4.1.0 I think it supports sending hashmaps of primitive data.
On 1/12/07, garima015 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we are using 4.0.2
any solution??
JAX-RPC POJO WS tests
-
Key: GERONIMO-2729
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2729
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: New Feature
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 2.0-M2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor updated GERONIMO-2729:
--
Attachment: jaxrpc-tests.patch
JAX-RPC POJO WS tests
-
JAX-RPC EJB Web Services support appears to be broken
-
Key: GERONIMO-2730
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2730
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor updated GERONIMO-2730:
--
Attachment: jaxrpc-ejb-tests.patch
JAX-RPC EJB Web Services support appears to be broken
Here is the current Board report off the top of my head. Please
provide your input. I'll finalize this based on comments put on this
thread at the end of Monday.
Thanks!
Geronimo Project - Board Report
Summary -
All in all it was fairly quiet at the end of the year. The project
team
XBean 2.8 has been released on 01/03/2007
On 1/12/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is the current Board report off the top of my head. Please
provide your input. I'll finalize this based on comments put on this
thread at the end of Monday.
Thanks!
Geronimo Project - Board
Hi All,
I put together a first draft for the M2 release notes, still has a long way to
go. This time a lot of info is pulled dynamically from JIRA and the Report Card.
Here is the link,
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/release-notes-20-m2txt.html
pls send your comments (including format)
Deployment fails when mime-type has + sign
Key: GERONIMO-2731
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2731
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular
Here is my concern...Assume a downloads page that looks like this:
Java Enterprise Edition Certified Releases
- Tomcat Axis OpenJPA
- Jetty CXF Cayenne
Other Releases
- Tomcat CXF OpenJPA
- Jetty Axis Cayenne
Minimal Assemblies
- Tomcat ...
There is a difference between being
On Jan 12,
Hi Matt,
There were a few JUGs if I recall correctly. I did the LA JUG in
November and did Javapolis in December.
Jeff
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Here is the current Board report off the top of my head. Please provide
your input. I'll finalize this based on comments put on this thread at
the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12464394
]
Christopher M. Cardona commented on GERONIMO-2689:
--
Here are the necessary widget name changes
Some people already mentioned this on IRC:
Compiling 1 source file to c:\development\test\server\modules\geronimo-jetty6-bu
ilder\target\classes
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
88 matches
Mail list logo
