[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gianny Damour closed GERONIMO-2978.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0-beta1
This is now implemented.
On Mar 17, 2007, at 4:09 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I think its high time this was changed to
org.apache.geronimo.activemq.
Any objections?
Not from me... Sounds good.
--kevan
On Mar 18, 2007, at 8:01 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Mar 17, 2007, at 4:09 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I think its high time this was changed to
org.apache.geronimo.activemq.
Any objections?
Not from me... Sounds good.
--kevan
It looks to me as if we are well on our way to use the groupId of
org.apache.geronimo.plugins for both maven plugins and geronimo
plugins. This might not be the wisest thing we ever did.
What if we changed the maven plugins to use
org.apache.geronimo.maven? Aside from massive backwards
I was trying to get my local repo to act as a plugin repository last
night and got this exception when I tried to use the command line
install-plugin command, which makes me wonder if we broke plugin
support?
This is with g. trunk.
$ java -jar bin/deployer.jar install-plugin
More improvements to the Geronimo Axis2 Integration
---
Key: GERONIMO-2979
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2979
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
Security
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lasantha Ranaweera closed GERONIMO-2952.
Resolution: Duplicate
GERONIMO-2979 will handle this issue.
Add more test
This has always been confusing to me too. I like your suggestion. +1
Best wishes,
Paul
On 3/18/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks to me as if we are well on our way to use the groupId of
org.apache.geronimo.plugins for both maven plugins and geronimo
plugins. This might not
I was able to install the welcome app as a plugin from my local repo
using the admin console, but I was not able to install that same
plugin using the CLI. So I think the problem might be specific to
the CLI.
Best wishes,
Paul
On 3/18/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was trying to
Folks,
Can folks post their TODO/Wish list for the hackathon? Personally
here's what i am looking at.
- Understand work already done in cxf integration and figure out
what's missing to reach the same level of integration
- Figure out what else needs to be done for both cxf and axis2
integration
Sounds good to me and 2.0 is a great time for it.
-Donald
David Jencks wrote:
It looks to me as if we are well on our way to use the groupId of
org.apache.geronimo.plugins for both maven plugins and geronimo
plugins. This might not be the wisest thing we ever did.
What if we changed the
The maven plugins should be changed to
org.apache.geronimo.mavenplugins IMO, been on my list... just never
happened.
--jason
On Mar 18, 2007, at 8:52 AM, David Jencks wrote:
It looks to me as if we are well on our way to use the groupId of
org.apache.geronimo.plugins for both maven
+1 to change. either one is ok.
-- dims
On 3/18/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The maven plugins should be changed to
org.apache.geronimo.mavenplugins IMO, been on my list... just never
happened.
--jason
On Mar 18, 2007, at 8:52 AM, David Jencks wrote:
It looks to me as if we
Ugh... more svn:ingore stuff... is it too much trouble to get people
to update their ~/.subversion/config to add these ignores?
I find it very useful at times to use `svn status` to find out what
generated stuff is in a tree. I can do this very easily by turning
off my local ignores, but
I had no idea there was a possibility to have a local ignore
configuration! This is great!
What would you like to see in the svn:ignore? Nothing? target? ??
thanks
david jencks
On Mar 18, 2007, at 4:36 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Ugh... more svn:ingore stuff... is it too much trouble to get
Personally, I would only like to see target in svn:ignore, since that
is the one location that is expected to have generated stuff for m2
builds.
Everything else, that I personally want to ignore I add in
~/.subversion/config in the [miscellany] section:
global-ignores = *.log *.save
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Dillon updated GERONIMO-2455:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.2
Upgrade to new MX4J service release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12481976
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2455:
I've updated 1.2 to use 3.0.2... but 1.1 is still using m1 and
Can someone who has the IBM 1.5 JDK installed please try to compile
and run G 1.2?
Should be easy enough to verify that it works... if you have the JDK
installed. Might take like 30 minutes tops to verify.
Can someone please try this, and comment on this issue if it works/
doesn't work:
We may want to take this time to fix a few other groupId thingys too...
We should change the base server/trunk groupId to:
org.apache.geronimo.server
And perhaps change the 'applications' groupId to simply 'apps'...
anyways, we'd end up with ids like:
testsupport/*
Repackage org.apache.activemq.gbean.* into org.apache.geronimo.activemq.gbean.*
---
Key: GERONIMO-2980
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2980
Project:
Somewhat related, I think we should rename the modules:
configs/activemq
- configs/activemq-ra
modules/geronimo-activemq-gbean -
modules/geronimo-activemq
modules/geronimo-activemq-gbean-management -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Dillon updated GERONIMO-2980:
---
Summary: Repackage org.apache.activemq.gbean.* into
org.apache.geronimo.activemq.* (was:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12481985
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2980:
Should also renamed the activemq modules at this time too:
*
Hi
I have done some but not a lot of work on this. (I have spent the last week
sick :( )
I agree that it would be better to avoid the use of queryname if posible.
I will have more of a detailed look tomorrow and get back to you.
David
Grant M wrote:
Hey David,
I was wondering if you
Anyone know why DeadProxyException are getting tosses like they are
going out of style when using the console to shutdown the server in
Jetty?
I've snipped out most of them... but there are a ton that are
thrown. Insane call depth too...
This appears to be something with the Jetty
DeadProxyException when shutdown from console (jetty)
-
Key: GERONIMO-2981
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2981
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level:
Good list to start with. Remember thatnot everyone that will be
there will be committers that have submitted NDAs so I think the TCK
discussion is best left for the geronimo-tck mailing list.
See you on Monday :)
On Mar 18, 2007, at 3:22 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Folks,
Can folks post
Dims,
Please share this info. with dev list because it will enable bit more
contribution for me on these areas too.
Have a nice time :-) .
Lasantha
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Folks,
Can folks post their TODO/Wish list for the hackathon? Personally
here's what i am looking at.
- Understand
On Mar 18, 2007, at 7:49 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Anyone know why DeadProxyException are getting tosses like they are
going out of style when using the console to shutdown the server in
Jetty?
Ya, this is a side effect of some changes I made so we'd construct
the managed objects for
On Mar 18, 2007, at 5:41 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Anyone know why DeadProxyException are getting tosses like they
are going out of style when using the console to shutdown the
server in Jetty?
Ya, this is a side effect of some changes I made so we'd construct
the managed objects for jetty
Thanks Jason. I really had no idea either.
-- dims
On 3/18/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally, I would only like to see target in svn:ignore, since that
is the one location that is expected to have generated stuff for m2
builds.
Everything else, that I personally want to
servlet-mapping url patterns may need / prepended
---
Key: GERONIMO-2982
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2982
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public
No worries... I think that most folks that add stuff to svn:ingore
don't realize there is a local global-ignores that can be used to
ignore files for their preference which doesn't force that preference
on everyone.
--jason
On Mar 18, 2007, at 5:59 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12482004
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-2455:
Great. Thanks Jason.
I doubt seriously that we'll ever have a
How did you get this setup? Can we get this up for Geronimo too?
--jason
On Mar 18, 2007, at 5:33 PM, David Blevins wrote:
FYI, we've been added to the Cenqua FishEye server for ASF
projects. Thanks to Cenqua for the hosting and Infra for giving us
the nod!
On Mar 18, 2007, at 5:53 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
How did you get this setup? Can we get this up for Geronimo too?
Ping Infra and Cenqua. It's pretty much a case by case basis.
Geronimo's section of svn is pretty large so they may just want to
wait till there is a generally available
On Mar 18, 2007, at 7:10 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Somewhat related, I think we should rename the modules:
configs/activemq
- configs/activemq-ra
modules/geronimo-activemq-gbean -
On Mar 18, 2007, at 3:22 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Folks,
Can folks post their TODO/Wish list for the hackathon? Personally
here's what i am looking at.
- Understand work already done in cxf integration and figure out
what's missing to reach the same level of integration
- Figure out what
Dims,
I'll contribute, but I will be 2000 miles away...
Lets keep all up to date as I think I can help contribute in this area.
I have a good idea of what is missing (since I have been so entrenched
in it), so feel free to ping me.
Thanks,
Jeff
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Mar 18, 2007, at 3:22
I compiled the latest branches/1.2 with the IBM 1.5.0 SR4 SDK on SLED10
i386 without any problems. I extracted the
geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.2-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz assembly and used
./geronimo.sh run to start the server and was able to log into the
Console and viewed the Info, JVM and DB Info
I just started the same assembly with the Sun 1.5.0_11 SDK, went through
the same Console steps and the server shutdown without any exceptions
I'll try to gather more log info tomorrow.
For now, I'd have to say 1.2 has some issue with the IBM JVMs
BTW - I started with a clean .m2
Thanks for looking into this :-)
--jason
On Mar 18, 2007, at 7:54 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
I just started the same assembly with the Sun 1.5.0_11 SDK, went
through the same Console steps and the server shutdown without any
exceptions
I'll try to gather more log info tomorrow.
For
1.0 is coming from tranql (see below).
Thanks
Anita
Path to dependency:
1)
org.apache.geronimo.modules:geronimo-connector-builder:jar:2.0-SNAPSH
T
2) org.tranql:tranql:jar:1.4.1
3)
org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec:jar:1.0
--- Jason Dillon
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks resolved GERONIMO-2982.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Greg Wilkins (was: David Jencks)
Changed in rev
Something I missed in my previous mail. Looks like test method in the
JPATest class is failing in the middle (simply speaking it doesn't call
the service method of TestServlet). Any ideas
Thanks,
Lasantha
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Mar 15, 2007, at 2:34 AM, Lasantha Ranaweera wrote:
Hi,
46 matches
Mail list logo
