In the directory of geronimo-trunk , after inputing
mvn -Dmaven.test.skip=true -e clean install
mvn test
mvn surefire-report:report
All the process was succefully finished.
But i cannot find the surefire report in ${trunk}/target/site as expected.
The surefire-report.html contains 0 test.
In
Installation of plugins via the command line is broken
--
Key: GERONIMO-2983
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2983
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gianny Damour closed GERONIMO-2983.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Regression: [Regression]
Now fixed.
Installation of plugins via
Hi,
I have just fixed this problem.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 19/03/2007, at 3:02 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I was trying to get my local repo to act as a plugin repository
last night and got this exception when I tried to use the command
line install-plugin command, which makes me wonder if we
+1
Thanks,
Gianny
On 19/03/2007, at 2:52 AM, David Jencks wrote:
It looks to me as if we are well on our way to use the groupId of
org.apache.geronimo.plugins for both maven plugins and geronimo
plugins. This might not be the wisest thing we ever did.
What if we changed the maven
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12482062
]
Greg Wilkins commented on GERONIMO-2982:
I have not found the reference for this... but I recall that the
New exchanges should have a lesser priority compared to new exchanges
-
Key: SM-884
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-884
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type:
Hi Karthiga,
just a quick comment on the Removing database pools doc. Don't resize the screenshots,
they are kinda hard to read. Do you think we should add some comments in Tips for writing and
formatting documentation?
Cheers!
Hernan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Page Edited : GMOxDOC20
--- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks to me as if we are well on our way to use the groupId of
org.apache.geronimo.plugins for both maven plugins and geronimo
plugins. This might not be the wisest thing we ever did.
What if we changed the maven plugins to use
WSA Epr are not recognized for namespaces other than
http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing
-
Key: SM-885
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-885
I agree.
Joe
David Jencks wrote:
It looks to me as if we are well on our way to use the groupId of
org.apache.geronimo.plugins for both maven plugins and geronimo
plugins. This might not be the wisest thing we ever did.
What if we changed the maven plugins to use org.apache.geronimo.maven?
As I thought about your list Dims' I wanted to make sure that people
understood that this is an opportunity to get together, do some work
and interact. Working towards 2.0 is an excellent thing but I don't
want your list to dissuade anyone one from coming that doesn't work
on WebServices
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet updated SM-885:
---
Priority: Trivial (was: Major)
WSA Epr are not recognized for namespaces other than
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_38887
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-820:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=519937
Such a value should not
Hi everybody,
how can I receive a MessageExchange in a POJO (exposed to the JBI Bus
through servicemix-jsr181)? Implementing MessageExchangeListener is not
possible.
greets Goldi
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/MessageExchange-in-POJO%21-tf3426974s12049.html#a9551891
I think such questions should be sent to the user list instead ...
Anyway, I'm not sure to understand your question.
Jsr181 component exposes a POJO as a service on the JBI bus,
so if you send an exchange to it, one of the pojo's methods will
be called.
You can also take a look at other ways to
On 19/03/2007, at 9:11 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
We may want to take this time to fix a few other groupId thingys
too...
We should change the base server/trunk groupId to:
org.apache.geronimo.server
+1
And perhaps change the 'applications' groupId to simply 'apps'...
anyways, we'd
You can/should generate the testsuite report from the trunk/testsuite directory.
For the best results, change the distributionManagementsiteurl
element to a local directory and then execute 'mvn site-deploy'
command.
The test reports will all be neatly integrated then.
Cheers
Prasad
On
Since these are filed under areas available and viewable
by an officer, the PMC chair, if so inclined, can
keep track of it.
On Mar 15, 2007, at 12:55 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
Thanks Jim. For future reference what's the best way to ask for this
type of verification? Should we use [EMAIL
thanks, ok next time I will sent such questions to user list
gnodet wrote:
I think such questions should be sent to the user list instead ...
Anyway, I'm not sure to understand your question.
Jsr181 component exposes a POJO as a service on the JBI bus,
so if you send an exchange to it,
Update Geronimo to latest javamail spec and provider releases.
---
Key: GERONIMO-2984
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2984
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Task
webservice: provide test cases for different protocol combinations
--
Key: GERONIMO-2985
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2985
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type:
Hi Folks,
I think Dims have applied GERONIMO-2979(More improvements to the
Geronimo Axis2 Integration) patch and closed the JIRA. But not it looks
it is not closed anymore. Does anybody has any idea?
I remember that today morning there was a problem of accessing JIRA from
my side. Don't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davanum Srinivas resolved GERONIMO-2979.
Resolution: Fixed
More improvements to the Geronimo Axis2 Integration
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick McGuire closed GERONIMO-2984.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 519970.
Update Geronimo to latest javamail spec and
There might be prob with tomcat with optional web.xml, needs a testcase
---
Key: GERONIMO-2986
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2986
Project: Geronimo
Thanks Dims. I thought you closed the issue. :-)
Lasantha Ranaweera wrote:
Hi Folks,
I think Dims have applied GERONIMO-2979(More improvements to the
Geronimo Axis2 Integration) patch and closed the JIRA. But not it
looks it is not closed anymore. Does anybody has any idea?
I remember
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12482114
]
Jeff Genender commented on GERONIMO-2986:
-
What is the issue?
There might be prob with tomcat with
Webservice: need different test for POJO
-
Key: GERONIMO-2987
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2987
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Test
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-2987:
--
Description:
This is a placeholder for different webservice POJOI test cases we need:
1)
Axis2: needs to support optional wsdl file
--
Key: GERONIMO-2988
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2988
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: New Feature
Security Level: public
in place deployment failure
---
Key: GERONIMO-2989
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2989
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul McMahan updated GERONIMO-2989:
---
Attachment: SampleJSP.war
in place deployment failure
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12482155
]
Lin Sun commented on GERONIMO-2986:
---
We're just creating todos so we can assign them. Right now, we need a
Hi Jeff,
It is never one prob!:-) I would agree with you that Axis2 should
handle that, not geronimo. However, G2977 is still valid and solves
the prob when wsdlLocation is used and the user isn't using service-ref.
We are going through what's missing in web services and open JIRAs for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-2987:
--
Description:
This is a placeholder for different webservice POJOI test cases we need:
1)
Axis2: Supports OASIS XML Catalogs 1.1 specification to be used to resolve web
service description document (wsdl/xsd)
---
Key: GERONIMO-2990
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-2990:
--
Component/s: webservices
Fix Version/s: 2.0
Affects Version/s: 2.0
Axis2:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-2987:
--
Description:
This is a placeholder for different webservice POJOI test cases we need:
1)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-2987:
--
Description:
This is a placeholder for different webservice POJOI test cases we need:
1)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul McMahan closed GERONIMO-2743.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.1.x)
Assignee: Paul McMahan
Axis2: supports service-ref overwrite
--
Key: GERONIMO-2991
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2991
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: New Feature
Security Level: public (Regular
Rakesh,
I was just looking at the dependency viewer and I had some comments:
- There seems to still be some problems using the viewers from safari.
Is anybody looking into these problems?
- Would it be possible to follow the dependencies recursively in the
viewer? For example, I'm looking at
Axis2: invoke the EJB3 container with the invoking method and method parameters
Key: GERONIMO-2992
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2992
Project:
Private repository causes offline builds to fail due to missing metadata
Key: GERONIMO-2993
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2993
Project: Geronimo
On Mar 19, 2007, at 6:52 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
And perhaps change the 'applications' groupId to simply 'apps'...
anyways, we'd end up with ids like:
testsupport/* org.apache.geronimo.server
modules/* org.apache.geronimo.server
To some extent, I would
Jarek / Jencks,
Based on the latest changes you made to the stax-api project in
Geronimo specs are you comfortable with the implementation of the
APIs? What I'd like to do is wrap this up and release the 1.0
version so there is one less SNAPSHOT to worry about.
Thoughts?
I talked with David J and Chris B about taking DT trunk and moving it
to branches/old20 and promoting branches/ejb3 to trunk. Any
objections?
Why old20? Why not just make ejb3 some new version, like 3.0 or
something, and then make the current trunk branches/2.0 ?
--jason
On Mar 19, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I talked with David J and Chris B about taking DT trunk and moving
it to branches/old20 and promoting
Actually, if old20 is not going to live long... then I don't care ;-)
--jason
On Mar 19, 2007, at 1:35 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Why old20? Why not just make ejb3 some new version, like 3.0 or
something, and then make the current trunk branches/2.0 ?
--jason
On Mar 19, 2007, at 1:21 PM,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Dillon closed GERONIMO-2455.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.1.2)
Assignee: Jason Dillon
Apache Roller plugin
-
Key: GERONIMO-2994
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2994
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: New Feature
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: Plugins
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Peter Petersson updated GERONIMO-2994:
--
Attachment: geronimo-web.xml
geronimo-web.xlm plan.
Apache Roller plugin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Peter Petersson updated GERONIMO-2994:
--
Attachment: roller-mysql-db-plan-1-2.xml
Roller mysql db pool plan
Apache Roller
That doesn't quite explain why sometimes it gets downloaded and
sometimes it doesn't... but thats probably just a bug in m2.
Anyways, I was disconcerted to discover this odd and unpredictable
behavior.
:-(
--jason
On Mar 18, 2007, at 8:35 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
1.0 is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Peter Petersson updated GERONIMO-2994:
--
Attachment: roller-custom.properties
Roller custom properties for the mysql 5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Peter Petersson updated GERONIMO-2994:
--
Attachment: roller-derbydb-plan-g1_2.xml
Roller db plan.
Apache Roller plugin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Peter Petersson updated GERONIMO-2994:
--
Attachment: roller-custom.properties
Custom properties for the derby db setup.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Peter Petersson updated GERONIMO-2994:
--
arrg missed the Grant license to ASF for a couple of files, could not find
out how to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Peter Petersson updated GERONIMO-2994:
--
Attachment: geronimo-web.xml
geronimo-web.xml file for Roller
Apache Roller
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Peter Petersson updated GERONIMO-2994:
--
Attachment: roller-custom.properties
Roller custom properties for the mysql setup.
Now that server/trunk requires 1.5 to build and run, I think we
should start to weed out our usage of the backport-util-concurrent
package (and concurrent if there is still anything left of that in
our src tree).
I think we may still have to include backport-util-concurrent-*.jar
in the
Jimmy cracked corn then.
On Mar 19, 2007, at 4:42 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Actually, if old20 is not going to live long... then I don't care ;-)
--jason
On Mar 19, 2007, at 1:35 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Why old20? Why not just make ejb3 some new version, like 3.0 or
something, and then
Weed out backport-util-concurrent usage for server/trunk
Key: GERONIMO-2995
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2995
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-2947:
--
Attachment: G2947-simple.patch
Hi, this is a simplified patch that can demonstrate the handlechain
Today, Dims, Jarek and I sit together and updated the web service
support table for G 2.0 [1] with references to the JIRA #s. We created
different JIRAs to record what are missing. We didn't update the EJB
section as much as POJO, as a lot of items are shared between EJB and
POJO. If the
Car modules should have explicit dependencies
-
Key: GERONIMO-2996
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2996
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level: public
I have noticed that maven behaves differently in a single module
build than multi module build. I was able to build
geronio-connector-builder online with only tranql 1.0 pom!, i.e. no jar
was downloaded. But the offline build kept failing from the modules
directory.
Thanks
Anita
---
Anyone know why this is still using:
repository/activemq/rars/activemq-ra-3.2.1.rar
--jason
Anyone know?
--jason
Thanks... I guess I could have just looked at the svn log too ;-)
But... why is it here? Where is it used? Or is this just for
reference?
--jason
On Mar 19, 2007, at 4:40 PM, David Blevins wrote:
$ svn log geronimo-openejb.xml
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell updated GERONIMO-2965:
Attachment: GERONIMO-2965-1.patch
For review and refactoring by David Jencks to handle
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell closed GERONIMO-2870.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0
Issued resolved via the new AnnotatedApp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell closed GERONIMO-2893.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0
As far as I know, this issue is resolved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12482290
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2994:
In rev 520214 I committed a start at using these plans to build
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks reassigned GERONIMO-2994:
--
Assignee: David Jencks
Apache Roller plugin
-
On Mar 19, 2007, at 2:44 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Now that server/trunk requires 1.5 to build and run, I think we
should start to weed out our usage of the backport-util-concurrent
package (and concurrent if there is still anything left of that in
our src tree).
I think we may still have
It is used when testing the openejb itests in G. This testing is
done by hand and there isn't any where really better for it.
-dain
On Mar 19, 2007, at 4:00 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Anyone know?
--jason
The Console uses it to know what version of the ActiveMQ RAR to
include in the connector plans when they are generated...
applications\console\geronimo-console-standard\src\main\java\org\apache\geronimo\console\jmsmanager\activemqCF\ActiveMQConnectorHelper.java
It was never updated
Aight then... what is this file for:
server/trunk/applications/console/geronimo-console-standard/src/
main/resources/jms-resource-providers.properties
It contains:
snip
provider.activemq.name=ActiveMQ
provider.activemq.rar=org.apache.geronimo.modules/geronimo-activemq-
ra//rar
Hi Hernan,
Sure, I'll insert the normal sized image. The only problem is that the
width is more than the screen, subsequently making that article look
unformatted. Is there any way around this?
We can definitely add some comments regarding images and preffered
sizes. Also the format of the
Excellent work folks and many thanks to Lin for the update. Looks
HACKATHON has really worked for web services stuff ;-) .
As a starting point I would like to give a crack on GERONIMO-2992 since
it looks bit simple than other issues (looking at outside) and also it
will brush up EJB knowledge
82 matches
Mail list logo
