[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Potter updated SM-883:
Attachment: SM-883-MBeanRegistration.patch
Attached patch in diff format as requested.
MBean
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet updated SM-781:
---
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Re: Bug in ScritpComponent when using script attribute
When you are in the Create Database Pool wizard the jar driver list could show
only jars containing Driver implementations
--
Key: GERONIMO-3106
Building with Maven version: 2.0.5
Revision: 530021 built with tests skipped
See the full build-1000.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/20070418/build-1000.log
[INFO] [resources:resources]
[INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
Downloading:
http
I was running some tests and was getting an error indicating that the
class javax.transaction.HeuristiccommitException could not be found.
I looked in specs/tags/geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.0 and found that the
class existed in the tags directory in source form. However, he
released jar is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12489781
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-3106:
What we have now is surely annoying and hard to use, but there
Hi,
build from trunk
I am trying to test a WAR that is using older taglib's, they are version 1.2.
The DOCTYPE has the DTD specified but it seems this DTD is being ignored and
the deployment tool is trying to validate against the uri
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee, this is the uri specified
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12489793
]
Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-3038:
created MYFACES-1587
h.tld file not getting properly generated
I think we are trying to upgrade the tlds to the latest schema and
validate that. Can you share the tld causing problems or at least
the stack trace indicating the problem?
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 18, 2007, at 8:29 AM, Don Hill wrote:
Hi,
build from trunk
I am trying to test a WAR
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_39025
]
Dejan Predovic commented on SM-936:
---
I need to check with my boss if that's ok, but I have to say I wouldn't really
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_39026
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-936:
Well, I was expecting a standard JBI component using servicemix-common.
There
Heres the error and stack
struts-nested.tld:2323:1: error: cvc-complex-type.2.4c: Expected element '
[EMAIL PROTECTED]://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee' before the end of the
content in element [EMAIL PROTECTED]://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee
Descriptor:
taglib
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-ws-
metadata_2.0_spec-1.2. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release these binaries
This vote will conclude Saturday April 21 at 1300 Eastern
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-stax-
api_1.0_spec-1.0. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release these binaries
This vote will conclude Saturday April 21 at 1300 Eastern
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-
jpa_3.0_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release these binaries
This vote will conclude Saturday April 21 at 1300 Eastern
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-
annotation_1.0_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release these binaries
This vote will conclude Saturday April 21 at 1300 Eastern
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-
jta_1.1_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release these binaries
This vote will conclude Saturday April 21 at 1300 Eastern
+1
-sachin
On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:22 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-ws-
metadata_2.0_spec-1.2. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release these binaries
+1
-sachin
On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:22 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-stax-
api_1.0_spec-1.0. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release these binaries
+1
-sachin
On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:22 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-
jpa_3.0_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release these binaries
This
+1
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1.
the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release these binaries
This vote will conclude Saturday April 21
+1
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review and vote on the binaries for
geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release these binaries
This vote will conclude Saturday
+1
On 4/18/07, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review and vote on the binaries for
geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not
+1
Jarek
On 4/18/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-ws-
metadata_2.0_spec-1.2. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release these binaries
This
+1
On 4/18/07, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1.
the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release these
+1
On 4/18/07, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
-sachin
On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:22 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-
jpa_3.0_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these
+1
Jarek
On 4/18/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-stax-
api_1.0_spec-1.0. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release these binaries
This
+1
Jarek
On 4/18/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-
annotation_1.0_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release these binaries
This
+1
On 4/18/07, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Jarek
On 4/18/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-ws-
metadata_2.0_spec-1.2. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these
Well anyway, if you are going to filter by the class, you still have the
problem of not seeing all its dependent classes/jars... But I really think
it shouldn't be a big deal in this context.
Talking about the performance hit related to this kind of filtering, it can
be avoided if you keep track
Just remember that one of the main reasons that there's an awkward
display of tons of JARs now is that the DB2 driver (did? does?)
require 3 JARs to all be added in order to function, and only one of
those has any kind of driver implementation AFAIK. (I think one is a
license and not sure about
The PropertiesLoginModuleManager should resolve all URIs relative to
GERONIMO_BASE. I am also seeing this:
ERROR : unknown operation getUsers() and
ERROR : unknown operation getGroups()
Thanks
Anita
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo!
These headers don't look like the latest rev of the text we are
required to use for releases, should be:
snip
/*
* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
* or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
* distributed with this work for additional information
*
Just noticed yesterday that Maven 2.0.6 was released on March 31 as a
bug fix release. I just built the Rev529799 server with unit tests
enabled from a clean repo with Maven 2.0.6 without any problems
-Donald
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
i can confirm it works for me too.
-- dims
On 4/18/07, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just noticed yesterday that Maven 2.0.6 was released on March 31 as a
bug fix release. I just built the Rev529799 server with unit tests
enabled from a clean repo with Maven 2.0.6 without any
Is this not a disaster waiting to happen? Do we really need to include
this package just for usage by the following?
modules\geronimo-deploy-tool\src\main\java\org\apache\geronimo\deployment\cli\InputPrompt.java
From their website -
JLine is not 100% pure Java. On Windows, it relies on a .dll
On Apr 18, 2007, at 1:36 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Is this not a disaster waiting to happen?
Windows is a disaster waiting to happen... oh wait its happened already.
Do we really need to include this package just for usage by the
following?
This won't actually log the stack trace as debug, it will log the
result of String.valueOf(e). If you actually want the trace, then:
log.debug(e.getMessage(), e);
--jason
On Apr 18, 2007, at 1:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: dims
Date: Wed Apr 18 13:36:48 2007
New Revision:
I've been using Maven 2.0.6 for a while now... with no issues.
Though I'm unaware of problems with 2.0.5 which force us to use
2.0.6. I'd recommend everyone upgrade to 2.0.6, but 2.0.5 works fine
too.
--jason
On Apr 18, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Just noticed yesterday that
Remove OpenEJB reference from plugins/org.apache.geronimo.runtime.v20/LICENSE
-
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-143
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-143
Oh nevermind, they were from the wrong tag.
-sachin
On Apr 18, 2007, at 6:22 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Which scripts did you copy them from? The bits in server/trunk/
assemblies/geronimo-boilerplate-minimal/src/main/resources/bin all
have the correct header.
--jason
On Apr 18, 2007, at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sachin Patel closed GERONIMODEVTOOLS-143.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0
Remove OpenEJB reference
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12489909
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-3011:
--
rev 530206 Resolve UsersURI and groupsURI relative
+1
Cheers
Prasad
On 4/18/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-
jta_1.1_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release these binaries
This
+1
Cheers
Prasad
On 4/18/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-stax-
api_1.0_spec-1.0. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release these binaries
APACHE GERONIMO STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2007-04-03 09:56:37 -0400 (Tue, 03 Apr 2007) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/STATUS
Upcoming Releases:
Geronimo
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 18, 2007, at 9:22 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-
jpa_3.0_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release these binaries
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 18, 2007, at 9:23 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-
annotation_1.0_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release these
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 18, 2007, at 9:22 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-stax-
api_1.0_spec-1.0. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release these
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 18, 2007, at 9:22 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-ws-
metadata_2.0_spec-1.2. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release these
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 18, 2007, at 9:23 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-
jta_1.1_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release these binaries
51 matches
Mail list logo
