L.S.,
Seems like a good addition for servicemix-eip at first glance. If you
want to contribute it to ServiceMix, the easiest way to ensure follow-up
on this would be by raising a JIRA issue.
Thank you,
Gert
ale wrote:
i finally managed to find a solution to the synchronizing issue i
Version not considered during dependency resolution for plugins
---
Key: GERONIMO-3242
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3242
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manu T George updated GERONIMO-3242:
Attachment: plugin-dependency-resolution.patch
Added a check if the version specified
Not sure if we are thinking about the same thing.
I was thinking about embedding the EJB engine within a SE so that you can
deploy annotated POJOs (EJB3)
and leverage the EJB3 features (transactions, security, CMP, injection,
etc...). For these POJOs to be invoked
from the JBI bus, you need to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy reassigned GERONIMO-3242:
-
Assignee: Vamsavardhana Reddy
Version not considered during
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-3242.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Completed: At revision: 546793 in trunk.
Version not
Hi,
Myself and Manu have been working on the integration thing. As a
first step, we have created a plugin for Geronimo that will let the
user to deploy standalone tuscany modules into Geronimo and use the
deployed services by looking up in JNDI. I have put the code in
Geronimo Sandbox at
Paul,
I've been an advocate of this approach as well so thanks for taking the
initiative on this. I'll take a look at what you've done later today.
There are probably a few issues we'll need to consider if we take this
plugin approach - splitting the console components from the underlying
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods resolved GERONIMO-3241.
Resolution: Fixed
Completed: At revision: 546862
The J2G Sources tool should have
I am going to release Deployment as it passed with all +1's The
other specs either had issues or were dependent on specs that had
issues so I'll spin up a new vote for them.
Thanks for your critical eyes.
On Jun 8, 2007, at 5:43 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review the specifications
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Warner reassigned GERONIMO-3160:
--
Assignee: (was: Jason Warner)
align J2G tool with Geronimo 's core eclipse
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul McMahan reassigned GERONIMO-3239:
--
Assignee: Paul McMahan (was: Erik B. Craig)
Jasper JSPCompiler used in J2G breaks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul McMahan closed GERONIMO-3239.
--
Resolution: Fixed
patch committed. thanks Erik!
Jasper JSPCompiler used in J2G breaks on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12504275
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-3234:
Applied GERONIMO-3234-2.patch as revision 546900.
Please review
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods resolved GERONIMO-3060.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0-M7
Assignee: Jay D. McHugh (was:
+1
-Donald
Rick McGuire wrote:
Please review the javamail specifications located at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc1/
The files in question are geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.0.tar.gz
http://people.apache.org/%7Eprasad/specs_rc1/geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.0.tar.gz,
which is the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-2892:
---
Fix Version/s: Verification Required
Undeploy locks files on Windows
I have made changes to the Servlet specification by replacing the web-
app_2_5.xsd as well as the web-app_2_2.dtd files with clean room
implementations. This is a heads up. Let's allow these to bake for
a few days and then we'll release these and be done with any IP issues.
On Jun 12, 2007, at 8:23 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Sure, but if you are planning to use this for the admin console
you'll probably need separate modules for jetty and tomcat anyway,
so 2 plans is more or less required even if they are identical.
Not sure I follow you on this. Do you mean
+1 for all 4 assemblies.
Joe
Jay D. McHugh wrote:
Full test (server start, database pool creations, app deploy, and app use)
+1 tomcat-jee5
+0 jetty-jee5 (app use fails - testing further to determine reason)
Basic test (server start and stop)
+1 tomcat-minimal
+1 jetty-minimal
Jay
Matt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-1917:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
(was: 1.1.2)
repository doesn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-2480:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5)
(was: 1.1.2)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-2322:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.1.2)
remove resources and unit-test specifications from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-1747:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.1.2)
HTTP-methods checks
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-2561:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.1.x)
(was: 1.1.2)
Uber
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1053?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-1053:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.1.2)
Session Bean, Finder, Method Permissions
On Jun 13, 2007, at 8:20 AM, Paul McMahan wrote:
On Jun 12, 2007, at 8:23 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Sure, but if you are planning to use this for the admin console
you'll probably need separate modules for jetty and tomcat anyway,
so 2 plans is more or less required even if they are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-2288:
---
Affects Version/s: 2.0-M6
1.2
1.1.1
On Jun 13, 2007, at 9:08 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
I've been an advocate of this approach as well so thanks for taking
the initiative on this. I'll take a look at what you've done later
today.
a significant part of this approach is based on the work you did on
little G, as well as the
On Jun 13, 2007, at 12:36 PM, David Jencks wrote:
module == car file (or plugin), i.e. pre-deployed application for
javaee apps, and you certainly can't run the same web module in
both the jetty and tomcat integrations. So, unless you are
proposing a really big redesign of what is in a
ActiveMQ violates System Properties
---
Key: GERONIMO-3243
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3243
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
+1
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I think I've narrowed the problem on the rebuild. When building from
the top-level it seems we pick up more cars than we want. If I build
local in the assemblies dir then things seem to be scoped correctly.
Something odd with Maven and / or how were using it.
The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
solprovider updated GERONIMO-3243:
--
Description:
The latest Geronimo 1.2 and 2.0 use ActiveMQ. (Would someone familiar with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
solprovider updated GERONIMO-3243:
--
Description:
The latest Geronimo 1.2 and 2.0 use ActiveMQ. (Would someone familiar with
+1
Cheers!
Hernan
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I think I've narrowed the problem on the rebuild. When building from
the top-level it seems we pick up more cars than we want. If I build
local in the assemblies dir then things seem to be scoped correctly.
Something odd with Maven and / or how were
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik B. Craig updated GERONIMO-3159:
Attachment: geronimo-3159.patch
Removed the old word document from the structure,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik B. Craig updated GERONIMO-3159:
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
J2G documentation
-
Please review the specifications located at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2
The only changes that were made to the binaries that passed a vote
over the past weekend was to add the scm section to the pom.xml.
I have dropped jsp specs from the vote now.
ws-metadata will have a 3 digit
+1
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/11/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I've narrowed the problem on the rebuild. When building from
the top-level it seems we pick up more cars than we want. If I build
local in the assemblies dir then things seem to be scoped correctly.
Something odd
do none of the spec releases get md5 sums nor pgp signatures?
Filip
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Please review the specifications located at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2
The only changes that were made to the binaries that passed a vote
over the past weekend was to add the scm section
Hi Filip,
Like Ragu, its in there. Looks like Prasad provided the tar ball of
the artifacts as they'd reside in the Maven Repo:
geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/
geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/org/
geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/org/apache/
APACHE GERONIMO STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2007-05-31 12:21:22 -0400 (Thu, 31 May 2007) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/STATUS
Upcoming Releases:
Geronimo
Hi,
Does anybody here have experience with deploying a maven2 module as a
maven1 module? For example, I would like to deploy the
geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec module as a maven1 module. This is for
Axis2 project to get them to use our annotation definitions instead of
their partial definitions.
Use the maven-one-plugin:
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-one-plugin/
--jason
On Jun 13, 2007, at 9:58 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Hi,
Does anybody here have experience with deploying a maven2 module as a
maven1 module? For example, I would like to deploy the
44 matches
Mail list logo
