Any other people interested ?
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On Aug 23, 2007, at 3:37 PM, Kit Plummer wrote:
I'd be up for a few chat sessions!
On 8/23/07, Nodet Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btw, if there is sufficient interest, we could organize irc meetings
to discuss these topics and
So if i understand you correctly, you are mostly concerned of enhancing
the JMS flow in the following areas:
* avoid ping/pong and lower bandwidth requirement
(avoid sending the whole exchange and only send the actual data)
* enhance security (authentication, encryption ?)
* enhance
On Aug 23, 2007, at 11:58 AM, James Strachan wrote:
On 8/22/07, Nodet Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I explained in the other thread, I've been working on a new API
for ServiceMix 4.0.
Hopefully this will serve as an input for JBI 2.0.
This API is available at
On Aug 24, 2007, at 5:04 AM, Nodet Guillaume wrote:
Any other people interested ?
I wouldn't mind listening in. We are in the very early stages of a
ServiceMix implementation, though, so I don't have a lot of
opinions... yet. :)
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
--
Daryl
I too would like to listen in.
Regards,
Gordon
Daryl Richter wrote:
On Aug 24, 2007, at 5:04 AM, Nodet Guillaume wrote:
Any other people interested ?
I wouldn't mind listening in. We are in the very early stages of a
ServiceMix implementation, though, so I don't have a lot of
On Aug 23, 2007, at 4:21 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 8/23/07, Kit Plummer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've used MagicDraw on OS X. It's pretty terrible...but does work
for
sequence diagrams. I'm not sure if they have a free version or
not.
Doesn't OmniGraffle do some UML stuff too?
Yeah
One topic not covered in this excellent post is a standard mechanism
to provide access to other endpoint metadata (e.g. the WSDL file) -
having that as a standard OSGi metadata would be cool (e.g. a WSDL
URI)
Yeah, I have had a closer look at how OSGi provides URL handlers.
This is not as
On 8/24/07, Nodet Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any other people interested ?
+1
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack(u30,D0G)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]5R\F)R=6-E+G-N61ED\!G;6%I;\YC;VT*
);'
Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
Apache Geronimo -
On 8/24/07, Adrian Co [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure if this is the right forum to bring this up, but I was
wondering if this is a good opportunity to migrate some of servicemix's
infra to newer version.
i.e.
1. Use slf4j as the logging framework. (http://www.slf4j.org/) - btw,
I'm not
On Aug 24, 2007, at 3:03 AM, Nodet Guillaume wrote:
So if i understand you correctly, you are mostly concerned of
enhancing
the JMS flow in the following areas:
* avoid ping/pong and lower bandwidth requirement
(avoid sending the whole exchange and only send the actual data)
*
On 8/24/07, Nodet Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if i understand you correctly, you are mostly concerned of enhancing
the JMS flow in the following areas:
* avoid ping/pong and lower bandwidth requirement
(avoid sending the whole exchange and only send the actual data)
*
On Aug 24, 2007, at 6:44 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 8/24/07, Nodet Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the registry side, I think one of the main problem is that there
is no way to tell the
difference between an endpoint that goes down because the server is
no more
accessibe (it will be up
On 8/24/07, Nodet Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 24, 2007, at 6:44 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 8/24/07, Nodet Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the registry side, I think one of the main problem is that there
is no way to tell the
difference between an endpoint that goes
Guillaume,
Just getting grounded...
Would SM 4.0 leverage Felix to get OSGi capabilities?
I took a grep through the code, it doesn't look like it uses it at all
right now:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/dev/apache.org/servicemix- grep -r elix *
and osgi appears only in the eclipse plugins.
Just
On 8/24/07, Brian O'Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guillaume,
Just getting grounded...
Would SM 4.0 leverage Felix to get OSGi capabilities?
I took a grep through the code, it doesn't look like it uses it at all
right now:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/dev/apache.org/servicemix- grep -r elix *
and
In my mind, ServiceMix will be agnostic wrt to the OSGi
implementation used.
At the same time, I'm thinking about creating a distribution for
ServiceMix that
would include Felix runtime...
And yeah, OSGi has never been a dependency so far.
I suggest to take a look at spring-osgi too.
See
On Aug 24, 2007, at 7:28 PM, Kit Plummer wrote:
On 8/24/07, Nodet Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if i understand you correctly, you are mostly concerned of
enhancing
the JMS flow in the following areas:
* avoid ping/pong and lower bandwidth requirement
(avoid sending the
On 8/24/07, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/24/07, Nodet Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any other people interested ?
+1
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print
unpack(u30,D0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]5R\F)R=6-E+G-N61ED\!G;6%I;\YC;VT*
);'
Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
Apache
Definitely interested. It's been a while since I've checked in on the
ServiceMix project and the directions wrt OSGi look extremely promising.
On 8/24/07, Nodet Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any other people interested ?
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On Aug 23, 2007, at 3:37 PM, Kit
On 8/23/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One other question... Is it necessary that the plugin (if it tends to be
different for Tomcat and Jetty or in another context, say Axis2 and CXF)
should be made available for all distributions? I guess we are establishing
the procedure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-2964:
--
Fix Version/s: 2.1
Though there was a patch waiting on the JIRA, it fell
On 8/23/07, Erik B. Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...or as an addition inside the Development Tools page,
much as the current Eclipse Plug-in section rests within there.
+1
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Song closed GERONIMO-3383.
--
Fixed
Connect button on LDAP Viewer portlet just listens on port 1389 ,not
10389
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick McGuire closed GERONIMO-3427.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1
Committed revision 569336.
STMP login fails
On Aug 23, 2007, at 1:48 PM, James Strachan wrote:
I thought I'd spin up another thread on this...
On 8/23/07, Brian O'Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/22/07, Nodet Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exchanges can be created using the Channel#createExchange method.
The only change I'd
I would like to attend this even.
Please let me know the details.
On 8/24/07, Nodet Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any other people interested ?
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On Aug 23, 2007, at 3:37 PM, Kit Plummer wrote:
I'd be up for a few chat sessions!
On 8/23/07, Nodet Guillaume
It does appear that File.toURL() produces a URL with spaces, while
File.toURI().toURL() correctly encodes the spaces with %20. Seems
very odd that File.toURL() doesn't do that internally, but eh...
--jason
On Aug 23, 2007, at 3:48 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
I am seeing this error
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joe Bohn reassigned GERONIMO-3401:
--
Assignee: Joe Bohn
Stop of module from System Modules in console should warn user of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12480820
]
pmcmahan edited comment on GERONIMO-2964 at 8/24/07 7:20 AM:
-
Are you interested
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12480820
]
pmcmahan edited comment on GERONIMO-2964 at 8/24/07 7:20 AM:
-
Are you interested
Tomcat exception reports reference non-existent log files
-
Key: GERONIMO-3442
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3442
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security
Any chance we can release a Jetty/Axis and Tomcat/CXF? 2 more TCK runs?
Jeff
Any chance we can release a Jetty/Axis and Tomcat/CXF? 2 more TCK runs?
Jeff
I'm interested too.
Brian O'Neill wrote:
Yes. I'm in.
-brian
On 8/24/07, Gordon Dickens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I too would like to listen in.
Regards,
Gordon
Daryl Richter wrote:
On Aug 24, 2007, at 5:04 AM, Nodet Guillaume wrote:
Any other people interested ?
Yes. I'm in.
-brian
On 8/24/07, Gordon Dickens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I too would like to listen in.
Regards,
Gordon
Daryl Richter wrote:
On Aug 24, 2007, at 5:04 AM, Nodet Guillaume wrote:
Any other people interested ?
I wouldn't mind listening in. We are in the very
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12522548
]
Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-2964:
Too bad this fell off the radar for 2.0, it's a useful patch. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12522550
]
Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-3401:
I started to look into this ... and I think the issue is even worse than
Not sure if this is the right forum to bring this up, but I was
wondering if this is a good opportunity to migrate some of servicemix's
infra to newer version.
i.e.
1. Use slf4j as the logging framework. (http://www.slf4j.org/) - btw,
I'm not sure if its a better option, but I did hear some
On 8/24/07, Adrian Co [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure if this is the right forum to bring this up, but I was
wondering if this is a good opportunity to migrate some of servicemix's
infra to newer version.
i.e.
1. Use slf4j as the logging framework. (http://www.slf4j.org/) - btw,
I'm not
--- Viet Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Anita,
I am really happy that you looked at the monitoring stuff. I looked
into
your suggestion to use the JSR-77 stuff that you have been working
on. It
seems to be a convenient way of pulling data from an abstract object.
Can
you give me an
If we have some working tool that facilitates migrating to Geronimo I think
it's definitively worth mentioning on the main web site.
It seems to me that a place somewhere closer to the dev tools subproject would
be a better fit.
I see there are two documents on the wiki (for Geronimo 1.1 and
I think some OpenEJB code in trunk is reconfiguring the log4j
settings. For example, when I start the server (with logging enabled)
first I see nicely formatted log messages (i.e. timestamp debug
level class msg) but after some OpenEJB code is loaded the log
message format changes to debug level
Erik, this is some very interesting work. Thanks for posting all
these details.
Like Anita's comment in GERONIMO-3441, I'm wondering whether or not
it would make sense to implement these new capabilities more tightly
with the JMX capabilities already in the server. I don't have her
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12522587
]
Johannes Weberhofer commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141:
--
Thank you! The latest
BTW, It's a user question so you'd be better off sending it to the
user mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (see
http://geronimo.apache.org/mailing-lists.html).
Ops, I thought the dev-list is for developing stuff. I will close
this thread an reopen it under the user list. Please ignore this
On 8/24/07, Nodet Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if i understand you correctly, you are mostly concerned of enhancing
the JMS flow in the following areas:
* avoid ping/pong and lower bandwidth requirement
(avoid sending the whole exchange and only send the actual data)
*
Thanks for reporting this. We'll have to find a way to disable that
functionality. There's some work being done on that code now, so as
soon as those patches are committed we can add some more to make it
so it can be disabled.
-David
On Aug 24, 2007, at 9:40 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
I
I put the 2.0.1 artifacts into the repo at Apache this morning and
they should be propagating if they haven't already. I was able to
build 2.0.1 after deleting my geronimo group in my local m2 repo.
Let me know if there are issues.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joe Bohn reopened GERONIMO-3401:
Given Matt's change to make this an improvement and the severe impact of the
problem on a
All,
I finally have all of the EJB 2.1 components pulled from trunk and have
converted DayTrader 2.0 over to be Java EE 5 only. I have functionally
tested as many of the operational modes and primitives that I can think of
and am ready to commit the changes.
Here is a high-level summary of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12522629
]
Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-3401:
I've done some more investigation into this to discover the other system
Able to download from remote M2 repos. Thanks Matt.
Vamsi
On 8/25/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I put the 2.0.1 artifacts into the repo at Apache this morning and
they should be propagating if they haven't already. I was able to
build 2.0.1 after deleting my geronimo group in
With a lot of help from Prasad I got the javadocs built on my machine. I
created a custom style sheet and frameset.
I just committed the 120+ Mb to the web site and it should for your review soon
at http://geronimo.apache.org/apidocs/2.0.1/
If you guys are OK with these then I'll go ahead and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-3421.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1
Committed revision 569528 in 2.0.2-SNAPSHOT
We've run into multiple issues caused by the dependency of our cxf
module on Spring.
Jarek, you've mentioned that it's possible to switch from Spring-
based configuration of CXF to, hmm, some other form of configuration
(xml/programmatic?). How hard would this be? Could we get this done
Kevan,
IIU the reason you are asking, removal of the Spring dependencies from
CXF would appear to be a band aid and temporary fix to the real issue.
Is this about the Spring versioning and different versions getting
loaded? (If not then never mind)
Jeff
Kevan Miller wrote:
We've run into
Kevan,
I'm out on vacation all next week but I was planning to take a look at
this issue right after I get back. My intention was to get it done for
the 2.0.2 release.
Jarek
j
On 8/24/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've run into multiple issues caused by the dependency of our cxf
Feel free to let me know when this is scheduled and I will try and
attend.
Terry
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-2971:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.1
2.0.x
Auto bind resources to Global JNDI
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-3115:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: Wish List)
2.1
2.0.x
MDB
OpenEJB trunk at 569540
Geronimo Revision: 569543 built with tests skipped
See the full build-1800.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20070824/build-1800.log
Downloading:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository//org/apache/tomcat/catalina-ha/6.0.13
On Aug 24, 2007, at 10:48 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Any chance we can release a Jetty/Axis and Tomcat/CXF? 2 more TCK
runs?
Both are released -- it's just a matter of configuration. You want
2 additional assemblies with these configured by default available
for download? Or are you
I think we should exclude these packages (some coming from
applications) from the docs:
org.apache.geronimo.console.*
checkbox
colors
compressionFilters
dates
error
examples
filters
jsp2.examples
jsp2.examples.el
On Aug 24, 2007, at 5:57 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Kevan,
I'm out on vacation all next week but I was planning to take a look at
this issue right after I get back. My intention was to get it done for
the 2.0.2 release.
Cool. That'd be great!
--kevan
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Aug 24, 2007, at 10:48 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Any chance we can release a Jetty/Axis and Tomcat/CXF? 2 more TCK runs?
Both are released -- it's just a matter of configuration. You want 2
additional assemblies with these configured by default available for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12522703
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-3424:
This is directly related to this issue with the
Should be fixed with Rev569598.
-Donald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OpenEJB trunk at 569540
Geronimo Revision: 569543 built with tests skipped
See the full build-1800.log file at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20070824/build-1800.log
Downloading: http://people.apache.org
67 matches
Mail list logo
