Ok, sounds like we have enough people.
So we just need to find a data and an hour.
What about Friday 3 pm GMT, 11 am EST, 8 am PST
Adrian, I'm not sure how to find a time that would suits you...
Other propositions are welcome...
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On Aug 24, 2007, at 11:04 AM, Nodet
works for me.
-brian
On 8/25/07, Nodet Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, sounds like we have enough people.
So we just need to find a data and an hour.
What about Friday 3 pm GMT, 11 am EST, 8 am PST
Adrian, I'm not sure how to find a time that would suits you...
Other propositions are
Me too. I think.
--
Kit Plummer
Nobody-in-Charge @ Black:Hole:Logic
http://www.blackholelogic.com
On Aug 24, 2007, at 6:53 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Aug 24, 2007, at 10:48 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Any chance we can release a Jetty/Axis and Tomcat/CXF? 2 more
TCK runs?
Both are released -- it's just a matter of configuration. You
want 2
additional
On Aug 24, 2007, at 5:35 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Kevan,
IIU the reason you are asking, removal of the Spring dependencies from
CXF would appear to be a band aid and temporary fix to the real issue.
Is this about the Spring versioning and different versions getting
loaded? (If not then never
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12522756
]
Vadim Dmitriev commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-145:
-
Missed that one. Thanks.
However, fix
Kevan Miller wrote:
That would be great. Do you have a login on the test systems that have
been used for cert? Or perhaps a better solution is to setup a shared
(or temporary use) cts login that could be used...
Sure...I would be happy to. Would you like to help me with the clustering?
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Aug 24, 2007, at 5:35 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Kevan,
IIU the reason you are asking, removal of the Spring dependencies from
CXF would appear to be a band aid and temporary fix to the real issue.
Is this about the Spring versioning and different versions getting
w00t ... thanks Chris.
On Aug 24, 2007, at 3:35 PM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
All,
I finally have all of the EJB 2.1 components pulled from trunk and
have converted DayTrader 2.0 over to be Java EE 5 only. I have
functionally tested as many of the operational modes and primitives
that
On Aug 25, 2007, at 10:47 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
That would be great. Do you have a login on the test systems that
have
been used for cert? Or perhaps a better solution is to setup a shared
(or temporary use) cts login that could be used...
Sure...I would be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12522779
]
Manu T George commented on GERONIMO-3115:
-
This mail from the openejb-dev list may throw some light on
On Aug 25, 2007, at 10:53 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Aug 24, 2007, at 5:35 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Kevan,
IIU the reason you are asking, removal of the Spring dependencies
from
CXF would appear to be a band aid and temporary fix to the real
issue.
Is this
Done
On Aug 22, 2007, at 5:45 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
Congratulations on the Geronimo 2.0.1 release. Are the released
artifacts availble in maven2 repo now?
Thanks,
Raymond
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods closed GERONIMODEVTOOLS-145.
-
Fix Version/s: 2.0
Vadim verified that GD-141 fixed it.
Provide
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12522791
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-3401:
Joe, are you uninstalling the config or just stopping the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1746?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-1746:
---
Summary: Cannot override default configurationFile value in Log4jService
GBean (was:
Kevan Miller wrote:
So, to be clear -- I certainly didn't mean to imply that *only* you
could certify these alternate configurations of Geronimo. If anyone with
TCK access wants to run these tests, then that's fantastic. I don't plan
on running them. If I see requests from Geronimo users
From my standpoint, it would be greatly preferred if you could find a way
to leave spring for CXF. There is definitely a lot of functionality
that would be lost if spring is not available. In particular, if a user
want to configure various things like message logging or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12522817
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-2964:
Well, this patch changes the TomcatWebAppContext constructor,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12522829
]
Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-3401:
Ahh ... thanks for pointing that out Donald. I spoke with Matt and I
20 matches
Mail list logo
