Fail to install plugin via deploy.bat/sh
Key: GERONIMO-3741
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3741
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
YunFeng Ma updated GERONIMO-3741:
-
Attachment: GERONIMO-3741.patch
A proposed patch for this.
Fail to install plugin via
OpenEJB trunk at 61
Geronimo Revision: 610298 built with tests included
See the full build-0300.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20080109/build-0300.log
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.069 sec
Running
On Jan 8, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
#3 is okay with me. Was just thinking that #2 (plugin) would allow
us to expose it on our plugin website and allow other users to just
place a dependency on it in their plugins
Oops. Got distracted and forgot to reply...
I was thinking
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12557288#action_12557288
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-3741:
Quick review of this patch, I'm not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods reassigned GERONIMO-3740:
--
Assignee: Donald Woods
Fail to run Deploy.bat/sh
-
#2 sounds good (with #3 later if someone requests it.)
Is there any due diligence work to complete (besides adding
License/Notice files to the jar and checking headers) before we move it
over, given Jeff did most of the work?
-Donald
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Donald
OpenEJB trunk at 61
Geronimo Revision: 610387 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20080109/build-0900.log
Building Geronimo trunk at Revision: 610387
Building OpenEJB trunk at 61
java version 1.5.0_12
Java(TM
Geronimo Revision: 610370 built with tests included
See the full build-0800.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/2.0/20080109/build-0800.log
Building Geronimo branches/2.0 at Revision: 610370
java version 1.5.0_08
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12557298#action_12557298
]
Joseph Leong commented on GERONIMO-3599:
The problem may be in the long POST.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12557303#action_12557303
]
Joseph Leong commented on GERONIMO-3599:
Working on splitting the options
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-3740.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Regression: [Regression]
Patch applied to trunk in Rev610467
Fail
AsyncHttpClient is an implementation of HTTP client functionality based on
Apache Mina. It does non-blocking I/O, and shows great scalability and
performance characteristic. The APIs are quite easy to use with a strong
focus on concurrent programming, employing futures and completion-service
If it is better and easier than http-client are they interested in
it? Seems like a logical fit. That said, I think Genender boy wanted
to melt some metal when he started this work. If it remains without a
home I'd put it in components and let folks pick it up if they are
interested.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12557452#action_12557452
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-3502:
A bit late but I like this solution.
Anyone interested in seeing if we can upgrade to AMQ 5 for g 2.1?
Apparently it has removed at least one of the annoying lets put a
non-string in system properties behaviors AMQ 4 liked to foist on us.
cf GERONIMO-3243
thanks
david jencks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12557454#action_12557454
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-3581:
I might have the code path wrong in my
Hi All,
I think this tool is extremely cool and will save a lot of time, specially for
new users.
I've been working on some doc for this wizard, here is the link
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC21/deployment-plan-creator.html
It is far from complete but pls send your input.
Cheers!
Hernan
Speaking of which, should we resume the 2.1 release discussion? Kinda lost
track where we left it sometime in Nov.
What I do know for sure is that there is a lot of new ground to cover in terms
of documentation ;-)
Some guestimated dates would help reorganize some of the topics.
Cheers!
I think Jeff started working on some of it over at MINA btw. Excuse the
cross post.
Alex
On Jan 9, 2008 4:10 PM, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it is better and easier than http-client are they interested in
it? Seems like a logical fit. That said, I think Genender boy wanted
On Jan 9, 2008 11:24 PM, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of which, should we resume the 2.1 release discussion? Kinda lost
track where we left it sometime in Nov.
I'd say we shouldn't wait for a release any longer and go straight to
it. I don't know what release procedure means
Well, I think it's OK for the Geronimo team to fork AHC, and I'd like
to respect them if Jeff already gave the information that his AHC work
will be placed under MINA trunk. They have their release schedule and
I don't want to let them wait for us. They will need to migrate to
the official MINA
On Jan 9, 2008, at 1:49 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Anyone interested in seeing if we can upgrade to AMQ 5 for g 2.1?
Apparently it has removed at least one of the annoying lets put a
non-string in system properties behaviors AMQ 4 liked to foist on us.
cf GERONIMO-3243
Sounds good to me.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12557501#action_12557501
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-3738:
rev 610624. I added the new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-70?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Warner updated GSHELL-70:
---
Attachment: GShell-70.patch
This works as described. I added a flag in the handler class so that it
On Jan 9, 2008, at 3:27 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Jan 9, 2008 11:24 PM, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of which, should we resume the 2.1 release discussion?
Kinda lost track where we left it sometime in Nov.
I'd say we shouldn't wait for a release any longer and go
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik B. Craig closed GERONIMO-3300.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 610651.
Dojo 1.0.2 and Dojo 0.4.3 now coexist in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik B. Craig reopened GERONIMO-3300:
-
Upgrade Dojo to 1.0
---
Key: GERONIMO-3300
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik B. Craig resolved GERONIMO-3300.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Upgrade Dojo to 1.0
---
Key:
While splitting out the plugin and deployment bits of the console I
had to remove the plugin install progress bar out of the base console
DWR servlet. I added another instance of this servlet into the new
plugin portal app but it doesn't seem to be working properly. Could
someone who
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12557534#action_12557534
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-3732:
Most of step 3 done in rev 610590. The
OpenEJB trunk at 61
Geronimo Revision: 610645 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20080109/build-2100.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20080109
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Jeff? Jeff?
On Jan 9, 2008, at 6:16 PM, Trustin Lee wrote:
Well, I think it's OK for the Geronimo team to fork AHC, and I'd like
to respect them if Jeff already gave the information that his AHC work
will be placed under MINA trunk. They have their release schedule and
I don't want to let
Heh heh. Yeah I caught up w/ all my holiday mail and saw that.
We've completed copying, though not paring down, Yoko to the Geronimo
area. Are you guys fine with me making the old Yoko area R/O?
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 9, 2008, at 1:32 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Thanks Alan!
I've already
I'm trying to put a 2.1 release of geronimo-txmanager so we can start
voting (and so we can include it in openejb and start that voting),
but there seems to be an issue with the genesis:project-config pom
forcing the release plugin to *only* look in
I ran into this problem trying to use the release plugin to release
these projects and could find no solution. I couldn't figure out
what made the location in genesis non-overrideable. I think we need
to get van zyl involved here or not use the release plugin. But
maybe you will have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12557556#action_12557556
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-3718:
rev 610694 and 610695 removed
37 matches
Mail list logo
