On Feb 16, 2008, at 9:51 AM, Peter Petersson wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
Now that 2.1 is released (I think :-) I'd like to move toward
releasing the Roller plugin pretty soon.
The major obstacle I know of is that the source of the roller war
used as input is rather mysterious and is certa
On Feb 16, 2008, at 3:09 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Feb 15, 2008, at 9:24 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I think we should work hard to make the documentation reference
live svn content using the snippet plugin. However my initial
attempts
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC21
unresolved i18n keys
Key: GERONIMO-3865
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3865
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: console
Affects V
Geronimo Revision: 629316 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080219/build-2100.log
See the unit test reports at
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080219/unit-test-reports
apache
Thanks Jay. I hit the same build error when I attempted as well ... I
think it was an unresolved dependency or something. Yes, we will have
to keep an eye on 2.0. Also, it appears that moving to 2.0 will require
some Geronimo changes as well.
Thanks for working on this patch.
Joe
Jay D.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jay D. McHugh closed GERONIMO-3855.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.2
2.1.1
2.1
Joe,
I went one revision id newer than the one that you previously built
(just so the artifact names would be different).
I agree that we need to keep an eye on Pluto. I think (I may be wrong
though) that we will want to keep track of what is going on with the 2.0
version (trunk) because th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12570540#action_12570540
]
Jay D. McHugh commented on GERONIMO-3855:
-
Committed to branches/2.1
Sending
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks updated GERONIMO-2994:
---
Attachment: GERONIMO-2994-nolibs.patch
GERONIMO-2994-roller-patch
Attached
Yes, I think this is a good short-term solution (as I mentioned below).
However I think we still need a longer term solution since it appears
that pluto is building on a new base.
Are you planning to pull in additional fixes or are you building the
same level of Pluto that I built earlier? .
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12570527#action_12570527
]
jaydm edited comment on GERONIMO-3855 at 2/19/08 5:24 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12570527#action_12570527
]
Jay D. McHugh commented on GERONIMO-3855:
-
It appears that Pluto is not currentl
On Feb 19, 2008, at 7:17 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote:
Hey Joe (and everyone else),
I took a look at both the trunk and 1.1.* branches of Pluto and they
have not (or at least -appear- to have not) gotten around to
implementing the same 'secure portlet page' functionality that was
in 1.0.x.
Updating our private copy as a stop-gap sounds like a good solution for
now. +1
-Donald
Jay D. McHugh wrote:
Hey Joe (and everyone else),
I took a look at both the trunk and 1.1.* branches of Pluto and they
have not (or at least -appear- to have not) gotten around to
implementing the same
Hey Joe (and everyone else),
I took a look at both the trunk and 1.1.* branches of Pluto and they
have not (or at least -appear- to have not) gotten around to
implementing the same 'secure portlet page' functionality that was in 1.0.x.
But, I tried a suggestion that was on one of the Pluto ma
With Geronimo Tomcat 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT, when a web app is stopped, I am
noticing that the call to stop() in GeronimoStandardContext.kill() is making
the sessions to be written to a SESSIONS.ser under the workDir for the
application. But then destroy() called immediately is resulting in the
deletion o
Hi Jay,
Do you have a fix in mind for this issue? I had started to look into
it. Here's what I discovered so far:
1) Pluto has essentially dropped the 1.2 release. This was formerly
their trunk. It has now been saved to a tag in favor of a new trunk
that is the merger of the 286 portlet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jay D. McHugh reassigned GERONIMO-3855:
---
Assignee: Jay D. McHugh
> PortletSecurityException in Plugins portlet
> --
In G2.0.2 tranql-connector-derby-embed-xa was version 1.4, and in G2.1
it's version 1.3, is it ok?
Vasily
Geronimo Revision: 629101 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080219/build-0900.log
Download the binaries from
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080219
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO
Puneet,
Have you tried your tests using Tomcat instead of Geronimo yet?
I was hoping that we would be able to isolate whether the problem was
within Tomcat or in Geronimo.
Jay
puneetjain wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to integrate servicemix with Geronimo.
I have written the http-uploader sample
On Feb 17, 2008 4:43 AM, Kevan Miller (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel]
>
> Kevan Miller reopened GERONIMODEVTOOLS-282:
> --
Geronimo Revision: 629014 built with tests included
See the full build-0300.log file at
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080219/build-0300.log
Download the binaries from
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080219
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO
Hi
Ever now and then configuration questions about setting up liferay with
G is popping up on the user list and soon it is time for G v2.1 to come
out of the closet. As it would be great to see a liferay bundle
(upgrade) that works out of the box with G v2.1 my question is if anyone
of you kn
24 matches
Mail list logo
