[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-263) Support 2.1 Geronimo deployment plans

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tim McConnell resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-263. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.1.0 JAXB refactoring fo

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-306) Plugin: org.apache.geronimo.st.ui

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tim McConnell resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-306. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.1.0 Assignee: T

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-302) Plugin: org.apache.geronimo.st.core

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tim McConnell resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-302. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.1.0 Resolved with the r

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-298) Plugin: org.apache.geronimo.runtime.common

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tim McConnell resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-298. Resolution: Fixed Resolved with resolution of GERONIMODEVTOOLS-30

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-301) Plugin: org.apache.geronimo.runtime.v21

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tim McConnell resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-301. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.1.0 Resolved with the r

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-300) Plugin: org.apache.geronimo.runtime.v20

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tim McConnell resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-300. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.1.0 Resolved with the r

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-311) Plugin: org.apache.geronimo.deployment.v21.jaxbmodel

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tim McConnell resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-311. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.1.0 Assignee: T

[jira] Reopened: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-291) Create 2.1.0 staging site

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tim McConnell reopened GERONIMODEVTOOLS-291: Reopening as needs to be retested after the JAXB refactoring is compl

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-315) Remove generation of JAXB classes for v20, v21 plugins

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tim McConnell resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-315. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.1.0 Resolved with revis

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-304) Plugin: org.apache.geronimo.st.v20.core

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tim McConnell resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-304. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.1.0 Refactoring no long

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 642654

Geronimo Revision: 642654 built with tests included See the full build-2100.log file at http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080329/build-2100.log Download the binaries from http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080329 [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL [INFO

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3937) java.lang.ArithmeticException: / by zero

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12583392#action_12583392 ] Erik B. Craig commented on GERONIMO-3937: - Committed revision 642673 to 2.1 Comm

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-3937) java.lang.ArithmeticException: / by zero

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Erik B. Craig closed GERONIMO-3937. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.2 2.1.1 > java.lang.Arithmeti

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3937) java.lang.ArithmeticException: / by zero

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Erik B. Craig updated GERONIMO-3937: Affects Version/s: 2.1.1 > java.lang.ArithmeticException: / by zero > --

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-3943) Upgrade dojo plugin to dojo version 1.1.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Erik B. Craig resolved GERONIMO-3943. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.2 > Upgrade dojo plugin to dojo version 1.1.

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3943) Upgrade dojo plugin to dojo version 1.1.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12583390#action_12583390 ] Erik B. Craig commented on GERONIMO-3943: - Committed revision 642662. > Upgrad

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3943) Upgrade dojo plugin to dojo version 1.1.0

Upgrade dojo plugin to dojo version 1.1.0 - Key: GERONIMO-3943 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3943 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Improvement Security Level: public (Regular i

Yoko version for Harmony?

Hi, all, As far as I understand, Yoko is now a Geronimo sub-component, but as far as I remember, there was an agreement [1] to keep the core ORB a standalone component so that it would be usable by, e. g. Harmony. Harmony now uses a very (more than a year) old version of Yoko and it causes proble

[BUILD] branches/2.1: Failed for Revision: 642529

Geronimo Revision: 642529 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/2.1/20080329/build-0800.log Download the binaries from http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/2.1/20080329 [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL [INFO

Re: Ideas for GSoC

Oh, ok. I see what's what. The student deadline hasn't passed but the project deadline has. I'm less confused now. Carry on! ;) ~Jason On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Jason Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I

Re: Ideas for GSoC

On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Jason Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I thought the deadlines had already passed? Didn't they already post the > list of accepted projects? Can't be according to the schedule - http://code.google.com/opensource/gsoc/2008/faqs.html#0.1_timeline. Jacek -- Jac

Re: [DISCUSS] GEP 2.1 support for v1.1

On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 7:19 AM, Tim McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > #3. Remove support altogether for v1.1 in this release of the GEP -- support > only the v2.0 and v2.1 Geronimo servers (the least expensive in terms of time > and testing required) s/althogether/temporarily which means

Re: Ideas for GSoC

I thought the deadlines had already passed? Didn't they already post the list of accepted projects? ~Jason Warner On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Just sent an email to various Polish mailing lists about GSoC > (http://code.google.com/opensou

Ideas for GSoC

Hi, Just sent an email to various Polish mailing lists about GSoC (http://code.google.com/opensource/gsoc/2008) my willingness to become a mentor or just to find one (that's about you) and thought about some ideas for prospect GSoC participants. Why could these ideas be? What tasks are the low-han

Re: [DISCUSS] GEP 2.1 support for v1.1

Hi Tim, Given that we already have a release that supports 1.1, I'd be inclined to go with #3 as well. It'd make it a little clunkier to go from 2.0 to 2.1(server), though, from what I understand. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the process for that would be to port your app to 2.0 server, and then