[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 706543

2008-10-21 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 706543 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081021/build-0300.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081021/unit-test

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4337) Upgrade to activeMQ 5.x

2008-10-21 Thread John Charles (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John Charles updated GERONIMO-4337: --- Attachment: geronimo-plugins.xml svn.diff I have built the activemq5

Re: javadoc for server source

2008-10-21 Thread Joe Bohn
Hmmm ... good point. I was just setting it in maven opts (xMx). I'll try setting it on the plugin config also and see if that helps. Thanks, Joe Jason Dillon wrote: Are you setting the plugin's maxmemory or just mvn's max? --jason On Oct 21, 2008, at 3:30 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: I think it

Re: javadoc for server source

2008-10-21 Thread Jason Dillon
The m-javadoc-plugin spawns a javadoc process, so the heap settings for mvn aren't going to get used at all there. You must configure the heap size in the plugins configuration. --jason On Oct 21, 2008, at 6:33 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: Hmmm ... good point. I was just setting it in maven opts

Re: javadoc for server source

2008-10-21 Thread Joe Bohn
Yep, that was the problem. I got it to work specifying maxmemory of 2048m (just started at the top) and then I decided to see if I could make it work with something smaller and discovered something funny. In genesis we specify 512 (not 512m). When I initially saw this I thought it must

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 706618

2008-10-21 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 706618 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081021/build-0900.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081021/unit-test

Re: javadoc for server source

2008-10-21 Thread Jason Dillon
Must be a change in the newer plugin, cause it used to work. --jason On Oct 21, 2008, at 8:13 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: Yep, that was the problem. I got it to work specifying maxmemory of 2048m (just started at the top) and then I decided to see if I could make it work with something smaller

Re: Java doc is Geronimo 2.0.1 API

2008-10-21 Thread Joe Bohn
I built and checked in the server 2.1.3 javadocs. This seemed to be the most expedient thing to do but there are some concerns: #1 This is a huge amount of content to include in svn. I think infra will not be happy with us. #2 Given #1, I debated deleting the 2.0.1 javadoc. However, this

Re: [VOTE] Release Genesis 1.5 - take 2 - CANCELLED

2008-10-21 Thread Joe Bohn
Continuing the dialog with myself :-) ... I decided to cancel this release candidate as well. I discovered a problem with the maven-javadoc-plugin configuration that I'd like to correct in this release of Genesis since it might be the last 1.x release. I'll have another candidate available

Re: Java doc is Geronimo 2.0.1 API

2008-10-21 Thread Jarek Gawor
Thanks Joe! I'm not sure why the javadoc is checked in into svn in the first place. Seems to me like that's unnecessary since we should always be able to regenerate the javadoc from source. So, I'm ok with removing any javadoc from svn but we should keep the javadoc for any major Geronimo version

[VOTE] Release Genesis 1.5 - take 3

2008-10-21 Thread Joe Bohn
This is a vote for Genesis 1.5. Take 3: In addition to take 1 take 2 this includes a more appropriate javadoc max memory setting. Take 2: Same as take 1 except for replacing the hard-coded dependency on geronimo-skin from 1.5-SNAPSHOT with 1.5 (this release). Take 1: While trying to get

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4368) OpenJPA can't find org.postgresql.Driver

2008-10-21 Thread Jay D. McHugh (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12641431#action_12641431 ] Jay D. McHugh commented on GERONIMO-4368: - I believe that what Donald meant when

Re: Java doc is Geronimo 2.0.1 API

2008-10-21 Thread Joe Bohn
I'm not really sure why the javadoc is checked into svn. I was just following the same process used for 2.0.1. I suppose there is nothing to prevent us from directly copying the content somewhere under /www/geronimo.apache.org as we do for the maven generated sites. That certainly sounds

[BUILD] branches/2.1: Failed for Revision: 706684

2008-10-21 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 706684 built with tests included See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20081021/build-1400.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20081021/unit-test-reports

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4368) OpenJPA can't find org.postgresql.Driver

2008-10-21 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12641496#action_12641496 ] Michał Kudła commented on GERONIMO-4368: Strange. I installed again 2.1.3 and

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-4368) OpenJPA can't find org.postgresql.Driver

2008-10-21 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michał Kudła closed GERONIMO-4368. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.1.3 2.1.4 strange, but now its

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 706723

2008-10-21 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 706723 built with tests included See the full build-1500.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081021/build-1500.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081021/unit-test

Re: [VOTE] Release Genesis 1.5 - take 3

2008-10-21 Thread Joe Bohn
Here's my +1 Joe Joe Bohn wrote: This is a vote for Genesis 1.5. Take 3: In addition to take 1 take 2 this includes a more appropriate javadoc max memory setting. Take 2: Same as take 1 except for replacing the hard-coded dependency on geronimo-skin from 1.5-SNAPSHOT with 1.5 (this

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4372) Wrong DEFAULT_IMAP_PORT in the Geronimo JavaMail 1.4 provider

2008-10-21 Thread Torsten Schlabach (JIRA)
Wrong DEFAULT_IMAP_PORT in the Geronimo JavaMail 1.4 provider - Key: GERONIMO-4372 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4372 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug

Re: [VOTE] Release Genesis 1.5 - take 3

2008-10-21 Thread Donald Woods
+1 -Donald Joe Bohn wrote: This is a vote for Genesis 1.5. Take 3: In addition to take 1 take 2 this includes a more appropriate javadoc max memory setting. Take 2: Same as take 1 except for replacing the hard-coded dependency on geronimo-skin from 1.5-SNAPSHOT with 1.5 (this release).

[ANNOUNCE] Welcome Jason Warner as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC

2008-10-21 Thread Kevan Miller
All, Please join us in congratulating Jason Warner as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC. It's been great to have Jason working with us as a committer on Geronimo. Even better to have him join us in providing oversight of the Geronimo project. Way to go Jason!!! The Apache Geronimo

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Jason Warner as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC

2008-10-21 Thread Joe Bohn
Congrats and welcome Jason!!! Joe Kevan Miller wrote: All, Please join us in congratulating Jason Warner as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC. It's been great to have Jason working with us as a committer on Geronimo. Even better to have him join us in providing oversight of the

Re: [VOTE] Release Genesis 1.5 - take 3

2008-10-21 Thread Kevan Miller
+1 Reviewed source, generated artifacts, and maven site. --kevan On Oct 21, 2008, at 12:01 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: This is a vote for Genesis 1.5. Take 3: In addition to take 1 take 2 this includes a more appropriate javadoc max memory setting. Take 2: Same as take 1 except for replacing

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Jason Warner as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC

2008-10-21 Thread Jarek Gawor
Congrats Jason! Jarek On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, Please join us in congratulating Jason Warner as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC. It's been great to have Jason working with us as a committer on Geronimo. Even better to have him join us

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Jason Warner as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC

2008-10-21 Thread Jay D. McHugh
Congratulations Jason! Jay Kevan Miller wrote: All, Please join us in congratulating Jason Warner as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC. It's been great to have Jason working with us as a committer on Geronimo. Even better to have him join us in providing oversight of the Geronimo

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Jason Warner as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC

2008-10-21 Thread Dan Becker
Kevan Miller wrote: Please join us in congratulating Jason Warner as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC. It's been great to have Jason working with us as a committer on Geronimo. Even better to have him join us in providing oversight of the Geronimo project. Excellent! Congratulations

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Jason Warner as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC

2008-10-21 Thread Donald Woods
Congrats Jason! -Donald Kevan Miller wrote: All, Please join us in congratulating Jason Warner as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC. It's been great to have Jason working with us as a committer on Geronimo. Even better to have him join us in providing oversight of the Geronimo

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Jason Warner as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC

2008-10-21 Thread Jack Cai
Congratulations from me too, Jason! - Jack 2008/10/22 Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] Congrats Jason! -Donald Kevan Miller wrote: All, Please join us in congratulating Jason Warner as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC. It's been great to have Jason working with us as a committer