[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4413) Improve usability of client.bat/sh

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12648947#action_12648947 ] Rex Wang commented on GERONIMO-4413: Thanks, Donald. Improve usability of

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4405) Postgresql new drives would not be listed in Drive Jars list and download driver list

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12648948#action_12648948 ] Rex Wang commented on GERONIMO-4405: Thanks, Donald. Postgresql new drives would

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4406) when client.bat/sh a non-exist project, return a error msg instead of a Exception stack log to user

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12648949#action_12648949 ] Rex Wang commented on GERONIMO-4406: Duplicated with the G-4413, Please close this,

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 718900

Geronimo Revision: 718900 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081119/build-0300.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081119 [INFO] BUILD

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3838) memory (probably related to sessions) leak

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12649018#action_12649018 ] Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-3838: Rev718945 in branches/2.1

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-4406) when client.bat/sh a non-exist project, return a error msg instead of a Exception stack log to user

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-4406. -- Resolution: Duplicate Fix Version/s: 2.2 2.1.4 Duplicate of

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4420) Create Files under repository even if fail to deploy a jar having problems.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-4420: --- Fix Version/s: 2.2 2.1.4 adding target fix versions Create Files

Re: Monitoring console docs

Thanks Donald for clearing this out. We'll remove topics you mentioned from G2.2 Document and keep them in GMOxDEV space. If there are any other topics that can be moved back to GMOxDEV, please let us know. We'd love to have your comments. Jeff Donald Woods-2 wrote: I really think topics

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4369) The new attribute values are overwrote while restarting the DB pool connector

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-4369: --- Patch Info: [Patch Available] Fix Version/s: 2.1.4 Assignee: Donald Woods

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4369) The new attribute values are overwrote while restarting the DB pool connector

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12649040#action_12649040 ] Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-4369: I don't think this is the correct fix. IMO we

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4369) The new attribute values are overwrote while restarting the DB pool connector

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12649044#action_12649044 ] Ivan commented on GERONIMO-4369: If the gbeans copy held by the running configuration

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3838) memory (probably related to sessions) leak

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-3838: --- Fix Version/s: 2.0.3 Rev718971 in branches/2.0 (2.0.3-SNAPSHOT) Rev718972 in trunk

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3838) Close potential denial of service attack vector (OOM) in Tomcat session handling

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-3838: --- Component/s: security Summary: Close potential denial of service attack vector

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4369) The new attribute values are overwrote while restarting the DB pool connector

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan updated GERONIMO-4369: --- Attachment: Geronimo-4369-11.19.patch Using reloadConfigurtion instead of restart. The new attribute

Re: 2.2 (trunk) bucket-o-snapshots

Updated information below on our snapshots (and some more questions/requests). Joe Bohn wrote: It has been mentioned several times that we should be looking to release Geronimo 2.2 before the end of the year (preferrably mid-December). Before we can consider a release there are a large

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 718965

Geronimo Revision: 718965 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081119/build-0900.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081119 [INFO] BUILD

Re: [DISCUSS] Only Support Java SE 6 with Geronimo 2.2

OK, given the info from Dan about CXF and JAXB, I withdraw my suggestion to only use the JAXB/JAXWS shipped in Java SE 6, which also means there is no good reason to only support Java SE 6 for runtime So, to summarize: 1) we continue on the path of including a JAXB/JAXWS in the assemblies

Re: Geronimo v2.2 discussion

Chatted with Joe and we're thinking that the current 2.2 release dates on the wiki should be moved out a few weeks to account for snapshots we still need released - http://www.nabble.com/2.2-%28trunk%29-bucket-o-snapshots-td20450456s134.html and major items that remain on the list for 2.2 -

[DISCUSS] What will trunk become after we create the 2.2 branch?

Current thinking is that we'll create branches/2.2 from trunk around Dec. 12, so we can start closing down the 2.2 release. What is everyone's thoughts on what version we'll use for trunk when that happens? 1) trunk becomes 3.0-SNAPSHOT and focused on JEE6 2) trunk becomes 2.3-SNAPSHOT, will

Re: [DISCUSS] What will trunk become after we create the 2.2 branch?

BTW - I'm for #1 below. -Donald Donald Woods wrote: Current thinking is that we'll create branches/2.2 from trunk around Dec. 12, so we can start closing down the 2.2 release. What is everyone's thoughts on what version we'll use for trunk when that happens? 1) trunk becomes 3.0-SNAPSHOT

Re: Geronimo v2.2 discussion

I'm obviously in favor of this. It's much more feasible and yet still very aggressive. Joe Donald Woods wrote: Chatted with Joe and we're thinking that the current 2.2 release dates on the wiki should be moved out a few weeks to account for snapshots we still need released -

Re: [DISCUSS] What will trunk become after we create the 2.2 branch?

Donald Woods wrote: Current thinking is that we'll create branches/2.2 from trunk around Dec. 12, so we can start closing down the 2.2 release. What is everyone's thoughts on what version we'll use for trunk when that happens? 1) trunk becomes 3.0-SNAPSHOT and focused on JEE6 2) trunk

Re: svn commit: r712326 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: framework/modules/geronimo-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/kernel/classloader/ framework/modules/geronimo-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/

Gianny Damour wrote: On 19/11/2008, at 5:19 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: Joe Bohn wrote: Just a heads up that I *think* there are still some issues with this change. It appears that the hiddenResource processing from the MultiParentClassloader was removed. Correction ... it was not removed but

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 719050

Geronimo Revision: 719050 built with tests included See the full build-1500.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081119/build-1500.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081119 [INFO] BUILD

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-3838) Close potential denial of service attack vector (OOM) in Tomcat session handling

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-3838. -- Resolution: Fixed Automated build for 2.1.4 looked good and web related TCK buckets passed

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4421) ContentType fails to parse content types with parameters containing escaped characters

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andreas Veithen updated GERONIMO-4421: -- Attachment: GERONIMO-4421.patch.txt Attached patch with a fix for this issue as

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4421) ContentType fails to parse content types with parameters containing escaped characters

ContentType fails to parse content types with parameters containing escaped characters -- Key: GERONIMO-4421 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4421

[BUILD] branches/2.0: Failed for Revision: 719139

Geronimo Revision: 719139 built with tests included See the full build-2000.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20081119/build-2000.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20081119/unit-test-reports

Re: [BUILD] branches/2.0: Failed for Revision: 719139

] Geronimo Revision: 719139 built with tests included See the full build-2000.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20081119/build-2000.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20081119/unit-test-reports

error starting trunk javaee5 assemblies

I'm getting the following error attempting to start the latest trunk servers. Is anybody else seeing this? It happens with both tomcat and jetty javaee5 assemblies. I reverted all local changes and updated but I'm still getting the same error so I'm thinking it isn't just me ... perhaps

Re: [BUILD] branches/2.0: Failed for Revision: 719139

at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20081119/build-2000.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20081119/unit-test-reports --- T E S T S

Re: svn commit: r712326 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: framework/modules/geronimo-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/kernel/classloader/ framework/modules/geronimo-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/

I think I'm getting it narrowed down a bit. It seems that when ChildrenConfigurationClassLoader.getResource(name) is called it never actually resulting in invoking MultiParentClassLoader.getResource(name) (at least not in this case). The MPCL should have been passed in when the CCCL was

Re: error starting trunk javaee5 assemblies

I have a build that I updated and ran around 12 today that seems to start alright. It's using a local build of openejb though, so I'm not sure if that would affect anything. I'll try updating fresh and building and see what happens. On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 9:53 PM, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: error starting trunk javaee5 assemblies

Thanks for the info Jason. Perhaps I have something corrupted in my local maven repo. I'll wipe it out and start from scratch. Joe Jason Warner wrote: I have a build that I updated and ran around 12 today that seems to start alright. It's using a local build of openejb though, so I'm

Re: [DISCUSS] What will trunk become after we create the 2.2 branch?

+1 from a non-committer. :-) -Jack 2008/11/20 Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Donald Woods wrote: Current thinking is that we'll create branches/2.2 from trunk around Dec. 12, so we can start closing down the 2.2 release. What is everyone's thoughts on what version we'll use for trunk when

java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService changes between Java 5 and 6

The java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService interface was slightly changed between Java 5 and Java 6: Here's an example: Java 5: invokeAll(CollectionCallableT tasks) Java 6: invokeAll(Collection? extends CallableT tasks) Here's more info on the change:

Re: error starting trunk javaee5 assemblies

Looks like it was my repo after all - cleaning it out resolved the issue. Thanks, Joe Joe Bohn wrote: Thanks for the info Jason. Perhaps I have something corrupted in my local maven repo. I'll wipe it out and start from scratch. Joe Jason Warner wrote: I have a build that I updated

Re: [DISCUSS] What will trunk become after we create the 2.2 branch?

It seems to me that 3.0 (with Java EE 6) is pretty far off and 2.3 release (with Java EE 5) is far more probable by then. But we do definitely need a place to work on EE 6 things and so we can make trunk EE 6 focused but at the same time I think we need a place where we can put code destined for

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3838) Close potential denial of service attack vector (OOM) in Tomcat session handling

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan updated GERONIMO-3838: --- Attachment: Geronimo-3838-11-19 For 2.0.patch For WADI is not used in Geronimo-2.0, so it seems that no

Re: [BUILD] branches/2.0: Failed for Revision: 719139

/11/20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Geronimo Revision: 719139 built with tests included See the full build-2000.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20081119/build-2000.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0

[BUILD] branches/2.0: Failed for Revision: 719177

Geronimo Revision: 719177 built with tests included See the full build-0200.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20081120/build-0200.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20081120/unit-test-reports

[jira] Created: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-535) Add support for installing from update site for IBM RAD v7.5

Add support for installing from update site for IBM RAD v7.5 Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-535 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-535 Project: Geronimo-Devtools

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-535) Add support for installing from update site for IBM RAD v7.5

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Delos Dai updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-535: --- Attachment: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-535.patch Add support for installing from