Geronimo VM-appliance?

2008-12-15 Thread Jason Dillon
I've been playing around with VMWare, trying to optimize my virtualization configuration, and it occurred to me that folks who are savvy to the virtualization concept might benefit from having a linux +openjdk+geronimo appliance ready to play with perhaps another which is ready for

Re: Geronimo VM-appliance?

2008-12-15 Thread David Jencks
I think this is a great idea. I doubt we can host it at apache. unless we do something like bsd + harmony (not even sure if that is likely to work) thanks david jencks On Dec 15, 2008, at 12:01 AM, Jason Dillon wrote: I've been playing around with VMWare, trying to optimize my

Re: [jira] Closed: (XBEAN-118) how remote access datasource by jndi

2008-12-15 Thread javahan
JIRA j...@apache.org wrote: [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks closed XBEAN-118. -- Resolution: Won't Fix This is out of scope for xbean-jndi.

Re: [jira] Closed: (XBEAN-118) how remote access datasource by jndi

2008-12-15 Thread javahan
thanks for you answer,but why geronimo hasn't provides a kind of method to get remote datasoruce as weblogic application server? Properties prop = new Properties(); prop.put(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY, weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactory); prop.put(Context.PROVIDER_URL,

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 726645

2008-12-15 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 726645 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081215/build-0300.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081215/unit-test

Re: Geronimo VM-appliance?

2008-12-15 Thread Jason Dillon
On Dec 15, 2008, at 3:24 PM, David Jencks wrote: I think this is a great idea. I doubt we can host it at apache. unless we do something like bsd + harmony (not even sure if that is likely to work) Thats what I've been realizing... But can we link to it/documented it from apache?

[jira] Commented: (XBEAN-118) how remote access datasource by jndi

2008-12-15 Thread javahan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12656575#action_12656575 ] javahan commented on XBEAN-118: --- thanks for you answer,but why geronimo hasn't provides a kind

Re: Geronimo VM-appliance?

2008-12-15 Thread Jason Dillon
Any idea why kinda of images you'd like to see? I'm gonna try and craft a simple, base-os+Geronimo image to test out. But I think we might want one which has say roller configured perhaps even another which can demonstrate AMQ's message distribution over a cluster. --jason On Dec 15,

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4468) jar-file elements are interpreted relatively to EAR root

2008-12-15 Thread Janko Heilgeist (JIRA)
jar-file elements are interpreted relatively to EAR root -- Key: GERONIMO-4468 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4468 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-4467) null pointer acess in code.

2008-12-15 Thread Joe Bohn (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joe Bohn reassigned GERONIMO-4467: -- Assignee: Joe Bohn null pointer acess in code. ---

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 726697

2008-12-15 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 726697 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081215/build-0900.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081215/unit-test

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-4467) null pointer acess in code.

2008-12-15 Thread Joe Bohn (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joe Bohn resolved GERONIMO-4467. Resolution: Fixed Comitted in trunk rev. 726699 and branches/2.1 rev. 726700 - Thanks for the

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4337) Upgrade to activeMQ 5.x

2008-12-15 Thread Jarek Gawor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12656644#action_12656644 ] Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-4337: --- Btw, I've noticed that with the new

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4468) jar-file elements are interpreted relatively to EAR root

2008-12-15 Thread Janko Heilgeist (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Janko Heilgeist updated GERONIMO-4468: -- Attachment: (was: geronimo-jarfile.tar.gz) jar-file elements are interpreted

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4468) jar-file elements are interpreted relatively to EAR root

2008-12-15 Thread Janko Heilgeist (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Janko Heilgeist updated GERONIMO-4468: -- Attachment: my-ear-1.0-SNAPSHOT.ear geronimo-jarfile.tar.gz The EAR

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4468) jar-file elements are interpreted relatively to EAR root

2008-12-15 Thread Janko Heilgeist (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Janko Heilgeist updated GERONIMO-4468: -- Attachment: (was: my-ear-1.0-SNAPSHOT.ear) jar-file elements are interpreted

Re: Geronimo v2.2 discussion

2008-12-15 Thread Donald Woods
Given where we are with 2.2, we did not create the branch last Friday as planned in the 2.2 Status page. I'll work with Joe today/tomorrow to get the status page updated and a new target date set. -Donald Hernan Cunico wrote: Hi All, We kinda started to have some discussion some time ago

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4468) jar-file elements are interpreted relatively to EAR root

2008-12-15 Thread Janko Heilgeist (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Janko Heilgeist updated GERONIMO-4468: -- Attachment: geronimo-jarfile.tar.gz my-ear-1.0-SNAPSHOT.ear

Re: Geronimo VM-appliance?

2008-12-15 Thread Donald Woods
OS+Java 6+FF3+Server+Samples+Eclipse+GEP would be ideal for developers -Donald Jason Dillon wrote: Any idea why kinda of images you'd like to see? I'm gonna try and craft a simple, base-os+Geronimo image to test out. But I think we might want one which has say roller configured

Re: [jira] Created: (GSHELL-151) Repackage org.apache.geronimo.gshell.* - org.apache.gshell.*

2008-12-15 Thread Donald Woods
Are you proposing GShell becoming a TLP and not a Geronimo subproject? -Donald Jason Dillon (JIRA) wrote: Repackage org.apache.geronimo.gshell.* - org.apache.gshell.* - Key: GSHELL-151 URL:

Re: Geronimo v2.2 discussion

2008-12-15 Thread Donald Woods
Joe and I agree that January 9th seems like a good 2.2 branch target, given where we currently stand on: - TCK - SNAPSHOT depends (Axis2, OpenEJB and Geornimo txmanager, specs, components, ...) - Admin Console XSS/XSRF exposure - AMQ 5.2 integration status - Additional testing needed

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4469) Missing schema's in /schema directory?

2008-12-15 Thread Kevan Miller (JIRA)
Missing schema's in /schema directory? -- Key: GERONIMO-4469 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4469 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues)

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4470) non-overridable filters working properly

2008-12-15 Thread Kevan Miller (JIRA)
non-overridable filters working properly Key: GERONIMO-4470 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4470 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues)

Re: [jira] Created: (GSHELL-151) Repackage org.apache.geronimo.gshell.* - org.apache.gshell.*

2008-12-15 Thread Jason Dillon
No, it just seems that subprojects don't seem to use the parents namespace. mina, activemq seems to follow that, even xbean does that. so i figured I would drop the extra layer. --jason On Dec 16, 2008, at 12:39 AM, Donald Woods wrote: Are you proposing GShell becoming a TLP and not a

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4470) non-overridable filters working properly

2008-12-15 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4470?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12656850#action_12656850 ] David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-4470: I don't see why you think this is a

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-4458) Another ClassLoader deadlock during server startup

2008-12-15 Thread Kevan Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-4458: -- Assignee: Kevan Miller Another ClassLoader deadlock during server startup

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-4469) Missing schema's in /schema directory?

2008-12-15 Thread Jarek Gawor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jarek Gawor reassigned GERONIMO-4469: - Assignee: Jarek Gawor Missing schema's in /schema directory?

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4469) Missing schema's in /schema directory?

2008-12-15 Thread Jarek Gawor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12656854#action_12656854 ] Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-4469: --- In 2.1 geronimo-jetty-*.xsd and

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4470) non-overridable filters working properly

2008-12-15 Thread Kevan Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4470?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12656865#action_12656865 ] Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-4470: I noticed the behavior while looking at

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4458) Another ClassLoader deadlock during server startup

2008-12-15 Thread Kevan Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12656871#action_12656871 ] Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-4458: Agreed that the contextclassloader

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 726928

2008-12-15 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 726928 built with tests included See the full build-2100.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081215/build-2100.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081215 [INFO] BUILD

Re: [jira] Created: (GSHELL-151) Repackage org.apache.geronimo.gshell.* - org.apache.gshell.*

2008-12-15 Thread Donald Woods
Seems like something we should vote on, given our specs, samples, components and plugin subprojects all use org.apache.geronimo.* -Donald Jason Dillon wrote: No, it just seems that subprojects don't seem to use the parents namespace. mina, activemq seems to follow that, even xbean does

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-4469) Missing schema's in /schema directory?

2008-12-15 Thread Jarek Gawor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMO-4469. --- Resolution: Fixed Committed changes to trunk (revision 726939) to install

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (GERONIMO-4469) Missing schema's in /schema directory?

2008-12-15 Thread Jarek Gawor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12656854#action_12656854 ] ga...@mcs.anl.gov edited comment on GERONIMO-4469 at 12/15/08 8:46 PM:

Re: Geronimo VM-appliance?

2008-12-15 Thread Jack Cai
If it's for developers, maybe add Maven too. -Jack 2008/12/16 Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org OS+Java 6+FF3+Server+Samples+Eclipse+GEP would be ideal for developers -Donald Jason Dillon wrote: Any idea why kinda of images you'd like to see? I'm gonna try and craft a simple,