Geronimo Revision: 767387 built with tests included
See the full build-0300.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090422/build-0300.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090422/unit-test
On Apr 15, 2009, at 10:42 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Apr 15, 2009, at 10:33 PM, Jack Cai wrote:
I agree that a 2.2 release would be nice to do to push out things
already in trunk, before our users wait for too long. :-)
I'm reviewing the list of planned features [1] and current status
Hi Luciano,
Are you able to deploy and run this app in a stand-alone Geronimo server?
-Jack
2009/4/22 Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:42 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Apr 20, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
I have just went
Geronimo Revision: 767478 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090422/build-0900.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090422/unit-test
David Jencks wrote:
On Apr 15, 2009, at 10:42 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I've been assuming that the classloader work Gianny and I have been
working on in my sandbox would get into 2.2. At the moment I think I
have the classloader framework more or less working and I'm going
through the
On Apr 22, 2009, at 6:58 AM, Bill Stoddard wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
On Apr 15, 2009, at 10:42 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I've been assuming that the classloader work Gianny and I have
been working on in my sandbox would get into 2.2. At the moment I
think I have the classloader
Geronimo Revision: 767598 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090422/build-1500.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090422/unit-test
Um, what kinda javadoc is this.
From what I have seen stuff like this tends to stay, asis... so if
you take the effort to check something like this in, why not add real
docs?
--jason
On Apr 23, 2009, at 2:30 AM, gno...@apache.org wrote:
Author: gnodet
Date: Wed Apr 22 19:30:51 2009
New
Mostly because given the stage at which is this project, it is imho
bound to heavy refatoring to handle all the issues and clean the code.
I don't want to spend too much time writing doc that will be
obsolete in a few days ...
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 21:38, Jason Dillon ja...@planet57.com
I've got an almost complete JSR-303 API (no Impl) over in Geronimo Specs
as GERONIMO-4619.
The API based on the 1.0 PFD is out on the ASF Snapshot repo -
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-validation_1.0_spec/1.0-SNAPSHOT/
The
Geronimo Revision: 767734 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090422/build-2100.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090422/unit-test
Rahul,
In terms of Geronimo here are some docs that might be helpful (some
info might be out of date):
1) Some basic GBean information - you will see/work with them a lot:
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/developing-and-deploying-a-geronimo-gbean.html
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Han Hong Fang reassigned GERONIMO-4620:
---
Assignee: Han Hong Fang
Database Security Realm is removed from admin consonle
13 matches
Mail list logo
